Folsn Product Catalog
REMOTE · MCP.FOLSN.COM
Search recorded Folsn product catalogs with linked public seller prices, shipping fees and URLs.
Available components
Last scanned (9 hours ago)
Scores higher than 69% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability59
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2464 tokens (~246/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
- Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 90% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 −1
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 0.2.0 ▼ security
- Tool “analyze_ingredients” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “compare_beauty_offers” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “get_beauty_product_detail” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “search_beauty_products” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “verify_cosmetic_safety” was removed ▼ security
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “get_catalog_offers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 159 → 246 ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 159 → 374 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 90% → 75% ▼ functional
- New tool “analyze_ingredients” functional
- New tool “compare_beauty_offers” functional
- New tool “get_beauty_product_detail” functional
- New tool “search_beauty_products” functional
- New tool “verify_cosmetic_safety” functional
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “analyze_ingredients” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “compare_beauty_offers” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_beauty_product_detail” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_beauty_products” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_folsn_products” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “verify_cosmetic_safety” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool coverage: 100% → 90% ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 266 → 159 ▲ functional
- Schema quality: excellent → good functional
- Server version: 0.1.0 → 0.2.0 functional
- New tool “get_catalog_offers” functional
- New tool “get_catalog_product” functional
- New tool “search_catalog_products” functional
- Tool “analyze_ingredients” changed its title: 전성분 및 주의성분 심층 분석 / Analyze cosmetic ingredients → 입력 성분명 분류 / Classify supplied ingredient names cosmetic
- Tool “compare_beauty_offers” changed its title: 화장품 전 채널 실시간 오퍼 및 10ml 단위가격 비교 / Compare beauty offers → 화장품 판매 관측 확인 / Check beauty offers cosmetic
- Tool “verify_cosmetic_safety” changed its title: 식약처 화장품 위해 회수 및 안전성 검증 / Verify cosmetic safety and recall → 화장품 안전 자료 확인 상태 / Cosmetic safety record status cosmetic
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
- Schema quality: 453 → 266 ▲ functional
- New tool “analyze_ingredients” functional
- New tool “compare_beauty_offers” functional
- New tool “get_beauty_product_detail” functional
- New tool “search_beauty_products” functional
- New tool “verify_cosmetic_safety” functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.folsn.com/public/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.folsn.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 28 Sept 2026 | 27 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5966f716dfcc4e720025b0a2af783a56e8c |
| SANs: mcp.folsn.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.folsn.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| folsn.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.folsn.com/public/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.folsn.com/public/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.folsn.com/public/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
analyze_ingredients 입력 성분명 분류 / Classify supplied ingredient names ~102
사용자가 직접 입력한 성분명을 분류합니다. 상품 원장의 전성분 출처와 피부 적합성은 확인되지 않았습니다. Classify user-supplied ingredient names; no product-specific ingredient or skin-safety claim.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ingredients_text | – | – | 전성분 텍스트 (콤마 구분) / comma-separated ingredients text |
| product_name_or_id | – | – | 상품명 또는 beauty_id / product name or beauty_id |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| analyzedIngredients | array | – | – |
| notice | string | – | – |
| productName | – | – | – |
| sensoryReviews | array | – | – |
| summary | – | yes | – |
No examples provided.
compare_beauty_offers 화장품 판매 관측 확인 / Check beauty offers ~93
개별 원천 검증된 오퍼만 표시합니다. 현재 구 뷰티 원장에는 검증된 오퍼가 없어 빈 목록을 반환합니다. Only verified offers; the old beauty ledger currently has none.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| barcode | – | – | 880 바코드 / 880 barcode |
| beauty_id | – | – | 화장품 고유 ID (BP_...) / unique beauty ID |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| beautyId | string | yes | – |
| capacity | string | yes | – |
| lowestEffectivePrice | – | – | – |
| lowestUnitPrice10ml | – | – | – |
| notice | string | – | – |
| offers | array | – | – |
| productName | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_beauty_product_detail 화장품 기준 원장 및 전성분 상세 / Get beauty product detail ~114
출처 미검증 화장품 원장의 기본 정보만 조회합니다. 인허가·전성분은 개별 근거 확인 전까지 비웁니다. Get basic catalog fields; regulatory and ingredient claims are withheld pending verification.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| barcode | – | – | 880 바코드(GTIN-13) / 880 barcode |
| beauty_id | – | – | 화장품 고유 ID (BP_...) / unique beauty ID |
| product_name | – | – | 상품명 검색어 / product name |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ingredients | array | – | – |
| notice | string | – | – |
| product | – | – | – |
| safetyRecall | – | – | – |
| sensoryReviews | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_catalog_offers 상품 판매처 관측 / Get catalog offers ~186
상품에 연결해 확인한 판매처 관측만 반환합니다: 공개 판매가·배송비·구매 링크·관측 시각. 관측이 30일보다 오래되었거나 확인되지 않은 값은 null입니다. 미연결 오퍼·시드 가격은 상품에 붙이지 않습니다. 폴슨이 수집한 판매처만 다루므로 가장 낮은 값도 전체 최저가가 아닙니다. Linked, checked seller observations only: public price, shipping fee, store link and observation time; fields stay null when unknown or older than 30 days. Unlinked offers and seed prices are never attached. Only sellers Folsn collected are covered, so the lowest value here is not a market-wide lowest price.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| product_id | string | yes | search_catalog_products의 productId |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| notice | string | yes | – |
| offers | array | – | – |
| productId | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_catalog_product 상품 마스터 상세 / Get catalog product ~62
검색 결과의 productId로 허용된 상품 마스터 필드·출처·검증 상태를 조회합니다. Get whitelisted master fields and evidence for a search result productId.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_id | string | yes | search_catalog_products의 productId |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| notice | string | yes | – |
| product | – | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_folsn_product_offer 폴슨 상품 판매 조건 / Get Folsn product offer ~200
검색 결과의 sku(스마트스토어 상품 번호)로 폴슨 상품 한 건의 판매 조건을 가져옵니다: 판매가(원)·배송비·쿠폰(현재는 수집하지 않아 null)·묶음 수량과 개당 환산가·재고 상태·구매 주소·가격 기록 시각·출처. 예: {"product_id": "13300090680"} Get the sale terms of one Folsn product by its sku (Smart Store product number) from search_folsn_products: price in KRW, shipping fee, coupon (not collected yet, null), bundle quantity and unit price, stock status, purchase URL, price record time and source. Example: {"product_id": "13300090680"}
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_id | string | yes | 검색 결과의 sku(스마트스토어 상품 번호) / sku from search_folsn_products |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| matchStatus | string | yes | – |
| notice | string | – | – |
| offers | array | – | – |
| productId | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_beauty_products 화장품 표준 상품 검색 / Search beauty products ~192
화장품 원장의 출처 미검증 상품 후보를 검색합니다. 인허가·가격·안전성은 보증하지 않습니다. Search cosmetic catalog candidates; approval, prices and safety remain unverified.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| exclude_ingredients | – | – | 제외할 성분 목록 (콤마 구분) / comma-separated ingredients to exclude |
| functional_type | – | – | 기능성화장품 종류 (미백, 주름개선, 자외선차단) / functional cosmetic type |
| limit | integer | – | 최대 결과 수 (1~20) / max results |
| query | string | yes | 화장품 상품명, 브랜드, 또는 바코드(880) / product name, brand or barcode |
| skin_type | – | – | 피부타입 필터 (민감성, 건성, 지성) / skin type filter (sensitive, dry, oily) |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| notice | string | – | – |
| products | array | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| totalCount | integer | yes | – |
No examples provided.
search_catalog_products 전체 상품 원장 검색 / Search catalog products ~97
보유 원장별 상품 후보를 이름·브랜드·모델·바코드로 찾습니다. 미검증 가공 필드는 상태로 표시하고 가격은 내지 않습니다. Search recorded catalog candidates across product sources; no price in search.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | 상품명·브랜드·모델·바코드 / name, brand, model, GTIN |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| notice | string | yes | – |
| products | array | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| status | string | – | – |
| unavailableSources | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
search_folsn_products 폴슨 상품 검색 / Search Folsn products ~420
폴슨(folsn)이 네이버 스마트스토어에서 직접 파는 상품을 상품 이름·옵션(용량·수량·색상·모델 번호)으로 찾습니다. 결과마다 판매가(원)·배송비·묶음 수량과 개당 환산가·재고 상태·구매 주소·가격 기록 시각·출처를 따로 돌려줍니다. 다른 쇼핑몰 가격이나 전체 최저가는 돌려주지 않습니다. 검색어는 한국어 상품명(브랜드 + 제품명 + 용량·수량)이 가장 잘 맞고, 등록된 영어 브랜드·상품명도 일부 지원합니다. matchStatus=needs_clarification이면 clarificationFields의 옵션을 사용자에게 되물으세요. 결과가 없으면 hint의 내용을 사용자에게 전해 주세요. 예: {"query": "쿤달 칫솔 16입", "limit": 5} Search products sold directly by Folsn on its own Naver Smart Store (Korea) by product name and option (volume, count, color, model number). Each result returns price in KRW, shipping fee, bundle quantity with unit price, stock status, purchase URL, the time the price was recorded, and the source as separate fields. It does not return other stores' prices or market-wide lowest prices. Korean product names (brand + product + volume/count) match best; selected English brand and product names also work. Unknown English words remain unchanged. If matchStatus=needs_clarification, ask the user about the options in clarificationFields. If there are no results, relay the hint to the user. Example: {"query": "클로란 피오니 샴푸 400ml", "limit": 5}
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | 최대 결과 수(1~10) / max results |
| query | string | yes | 상품 이름·옵션 검색어 또는 sku / product name and options, or sku |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clarificationFields | array | – | – |
| hint | – | – | – |
| matchStatus | string | yes | – |
| notice | string | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| relatedResults | array | – | – |
| resultCount | integer | yes | – |
| results | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
verify_cosmetic_safety 화장품 안전 자료 확인 상태 / Cosmetic safety record status ~91
공개 검증 가능한 인허가·회수 원천이 없어 상태를 미확인으로 반환합니다. 회수 기록 없음은 안전 판정이 아닙니다. No verified regulatory source is connected; absence of a recall row does not establish safety.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| barcode_or_name | string | yes | 바코드(880) 또는 화장품 상품명 / barcode or cosmetic product name |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| approvalNo | – | – | – |
| isRecalled | – | – | – |
| isRegisteredApproved | – | – | – |
| notice | string | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| recallInfo | – | – | – |
| verdict | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Folsn Product Catalog MCP server?
Folsn Product Catalog is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.folsn.com/public/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.folsn.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-folsn-mcp-own-store-products 'https://mcp.folsn.com/public/mcp'
What is the Folsn Product Catalog MCP server?
Folsn Product Catalog is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.folsn.mcp/own-store-products. Search recorded Folsn product catalogs with linked public seller prices, shipping fees and URLs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.folsn.com/public/mcp).
Is the Folsn Product Catalog MCP server safe to use?
Folsn Product Catalog scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Folsn Product Catalog MCP server expose?
Folsn Product Catalog exposes 10 tools: search_folsn_products, get_folsn_product_offer, search_catalog_products, get_catalog_product, get_catalog_offers, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,557 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Folsn Product Catalog MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Folsn Product Catalog without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Folsn Product Catalog MCP server still maintained?
Folsn Product Catalog is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Folsn Product Catalog MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Folsn Product Catalog, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.