Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

focxle — what your AI agents cost

PYPI · FOCXLE

Ask what your AI agents cost. Per agent, across every vendor, from your editor.

Available components

0 this week 39 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 29% of PyPI servers

Deprecated

This server is marked deprecated in the MCP registry. The registry records this reason: The Python spend SDK is retired. The platform lives on at com.focxle/afos over MCP.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema for these checks to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until we can run it. How we score packages →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 29 Sept 26 0
    • Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 15 Sept 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 14 Sept 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 21 Aug 26 0
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 16 Aug 26 0
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 16 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/focxle@0.1.7

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. Our sandbox could not run this package, so no tool list has been captured. That is a gap on our side, not a finding about the package.

Install

How do I install the focxle — what your AI agents cost MCP server?

focxle — what your AI agents cost runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx focxle. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · focxle

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add com-focxle-spend -- uvx focxle
Common questions

What is the focxle — what your AI agents cost MCP server?

focxle — what your AI agents cost is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.focxle/spend. Ask what your AI agents cost. Per agent, across every vendor, from your editor. This page covers its PyPI package (focxle).

Is the focxle — what your AI agents cost MCP server safe to use?

focxle — what your AI agents cost scores 39 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 16 October 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Is the focxle — what your AI agents cost MCP server still maintained?

focxle — what your AI agents cost is marked deprecated in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 16 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the focxle — what your AI agents cost MCP server under?

focxle — what your AI agents cost declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.