com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic
NPM · FEEDBACK-MAGIC-MCP · SCANNED SEP 24
Create Feedback Magic widgets — feedback, surveys, changelog, roadmap — from your AI editor.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 31 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL returned HTTP 404. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 43 days ago).Pass
- Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 463 tokens (~51/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage97
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 92% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic MCP server?
com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y feedback-magic-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · feedback-magic-mcp
claude mcp add com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic -- npx -y feedback-magic-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"feedback-magic-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"feedback-magic-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic -- npx -y feedback-magic-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"feedback-magic-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic --command npx --arg -y --arg feedback-magic-mcp
mcp_servers:
com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "feedback-magic-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"feedback-magic-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic -t stdio -c npx -a -y feedback-magic-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"com-feedback-magic-feedback-magic": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"feedback-magic-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 23 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 −2
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 17 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 −2
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/feedback-magic-mcp@1.3.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 96 packages
| Packages resolved | 96 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
create_widget ~121
Create a widget under a project and return its publishable key (fm_pub_…). For surveys, pass `goal` to have AI design the question set from a plain-English goal. Then call get_embed_snippet to embed it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| goal | string | – | Surveys only: what the survey should find out (AI designs the questions; uses AI credits). |
| name | string | – | Optional display name for the widget. |
| project_id | string | yes | The project id (uuid) to create the widget under. |
| type | string | – | Widget type. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_embed_snippet ~67
Generate a paste-ready embed snippet for a widget key, in the given framework.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| framework | string | – | react | web-component | html | wordpress |
| publishable_key | string | yes | The widget publishable key (fm_pub_…). |
| type | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_insights ~54
Read the project's latest AI digest (themes, top issues, narrative) and 30-day category mix. Requires the 'read' scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | string | yes | The project id (uuid) from list_projects. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_survey_results ~47
Read a survey widget's aggregated results (per-question value counts). Requires the 'read' scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| widget_id | string | yes | The widget id (uuid) from list_widgets. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_projects ~22
List the projects (sites/apps) in the connected Feedback Magic workspace.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_widget_types ~30
Describe the six Feedback Magic widget types (feedback, survey, annotate, changelog, board, testimonial).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_widgets ~40
List the widgets under a project. Pass a project_id from list_projects.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | string | yes | The project id (uuid) from list_projects. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_feedback ~62
Search a project's feedback (title/status/severity + a snippet). Requires a token with the 'read' scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | string | yes | The project id (uuid) from list_projects. |
| query | string | yes | Search terms (min 2 characters). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
whoami ~20
Show which Feedback Magic workspace the configured API token belongs to.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic MCP server?
com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic. Create Feedback Magic widgets, feedback, surveys, changelog, roadmap, from your AI editor. This page covers its npm package (feedback-magic-mcp).
Is the com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic MCP server safe to use?
com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 24 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic MCP server expose?
com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic exposes 9 tools: list_widget_types, whoami, list_projects, list_widgets, create_widget, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 463 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic MCP server still maintained?
com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic MCP server under?
com.feedback-magic/feedback-magic declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.