ERP Partner Finder
REMOTE · ERPPARTNERFINDER.COM
Search, compare and shortlist Odoo partners in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.
Available components
Last scanned (14 hours ago)
Scores higher than 73% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 585 tokens (~117/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage78
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 33% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Checks we ran (12)
- TLS certificate
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (1)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 3 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://erppartnerfinder.com/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.erppartnerfinder.com | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 4 Oct 2026 | 2 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 6a1b32fd0a7bb2ee36b0e042df7ac6e5d57 |
| SANs: *.erppartnerfinder.com, erppartnerfinder.com | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of erppartnerfinder.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| erppartnerfinder.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://erppartnerfinder.com/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://erppartnerfinder.com/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://erppartnerfinder.com/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
directory_stats Odoo partner statistics for DACH ~39
Aggregate figures: partners per country and tier, medians per tier, pricing transparency, AI-assisted delivery, cities and app specialisms with the most partners.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_partner Get an Odoo partner profile ~70
Full profile of one partner: odoo.com figures (tier, references by industry, certified experts, project sizes, retention) and facts from the partner's own website (services, specialisms, prices, AI-assisted delivery, hosting, languages).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Partner slug from search_partners |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
match_partners Match partners to a project ~130
Rule-based shortlist (up to 5) for a buyer's project, with the reasons for each match — the same published matching rules as the questionnaire on erppartnerfinder.com. Read-only: nothing is sent to any partner. To let the buyer contact partners, call prepare_request.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ai_assisted_delivery | string | – | – |
| apps | array | – | – |
| country | string | yes | – |
| employees | string | yes | – |
| industry | string | yes | – |
| languages | array | – | – |
| situation | string | yes | – |
| users | string | yes | Planned Odoo users |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
prepare_request Prepare a partner request for the buyer ~208
Saves the buyer's project answers (no personal data) and returns a link to erppartnerfinder.com where the buyer reviews the answers, adds their own contact details, confirms their email and chooses which partners receive the request. Nothing is sent to partners and no email is sent by this tool. Give the link to the buyer; it is valid for 30 days. Optionally name one partner the buyer asked about (it is then always shown and preselected).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ai_assisted_delivery | string | – | – |
| apps | array | – | – |
| country | string | yes | – |
| employees | string | yes | – |
| industry | string | yes | – |
| language | string | – | Language of the page the buyer will see |
| languages | array | – | – |
| partner_slug | string | – | A partner the buyer specifically wants to contact (slug from search_partners) |
| situation | string | yes | – |
| timeline | string | – | – |
| users | string | yes | Planned Odoo users |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_partners Search Odoo partners ~138
Search the Odoo implementation partners in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, ranked by a published formula (tier, references, certified experts, retention). Filter by country, city, tier, app specialism or industry focus.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| app | string | – | Odoo app the partner highlights as a specialism |
| city | string | – | City name, e.g. München, Munich, Wien, Zürich |
| country | string | – | – |
| industry | string | – | Industry the partner states as a focus |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | – | Text in the partner name or summary |
| tier | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the ERP Partner Finder MCP server?
ERP Partner Finder is a hosted endpoint at https://erppartnerfinder.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · erppartnerfinder.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-erppartnerfinder-partner-finder 'https://erppartnerfinder.com/api/mcp'
What is the ERP Partner Finder MCP server?
ERP Partner Finder is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.erppartnerfinder/partner-finder. Search, compare and shortlist Odoo partners in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://erppartnerfinder.com/api/mcp).
Is the ERP Partner Finder MCP server safe to use?
ERP Partner Finder scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ERP Partner Finder MCP server expose?
ERP Partner Finder exposes 5 tools: search_partners, get_partner, match_partners, prepare_request, directory_stats. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 585 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the ERP Partner Finder MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to ERP Partner Finder without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the ERP Partner Finder MCP server still maintained?
ERP Partner Finder is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the ERP Partner Finder MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on ERP Partner Finder, covering TLS certificate, HTTPS, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 8 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about ERP Partner Finder: Authorization. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.