EP Votes
REMOTE · EPVOTES.COM
European Parliament roll-call votes, MEP records and dossiers from official records.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 79% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1276 tokens (~212/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
- Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 0
- Tool “get_mep” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_votes” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 189 → 212 ▼ functional
- “get_dossier” added an optional parameter “votes_page” cosmetic
- “get_mep” added an optional parameter “from” cosmetic
- “get_mep” added an optional parameter “to” cosmetic
- “get_mep” reworded the description of “page” cosmetic
- “get_mep” reworded the description of “topic” cosmetic
- “list_votes” reworded the description of “query” cosmetic
- 22 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://epvotes.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=epvotes.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Oct 2026 | 19 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 1e226c64cc7e3d620e51c542b1c684c6 |
| SANs: epvotes.com, next.epvotes.com, *.next.epvotes.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of epvotes.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| epvotes.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://epvotes.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://epvotes.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://epvotes.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_groups Compare political groups ~145
Use this when the user wants to compare how two or three European Parliament political groups voted across recent final votes on texts (amendments left out), e.g. "how often did EPP and S&D vote the same way". Groups: The Left, S&D, Greens/EFA, Renew, EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| from | string | – | Optional start date, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| groups | array | yes | Two or three group names, e.g. ["EPP", "S&D"]. |
| limit | integer | – | Newest votes to compare. |
| to | string | – | Optional end date, YYYY-MM-DD. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_dossier Get a dossier ~138
Use this when the user asks about one European Parliament dossier (procedure): what it is, its type, lead committee, rapporteurs, the steps so far in Parliament, its plenary votes, and the Legislative Observatory summary. Takes a procedure reference such as "2023/0212(COD)" or an id such as "2023-0212" (use search_parliament first if you only know the title).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dossier | string | yes | Procedure reference "2023/0212(COD)" or id "2023-0212". |
| votes_page | integer | – | Page of plenary votes, 50 per page. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_mep Get an MEP's record ~241
Use this when the user asks about one Member of the European Parliament: country, political group, committees, how often they vote with their group, where they broke with it, and their recent roll-call votes. Takes an MEP id or a name. Set topic to keep only votes whose label, agenda item topic or dossier title contains those words (e.g. "digital euro", "Mercosur"). Set from and to to read one period; page through all votes of the term with page.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| from | string | – | Optional: only votes on or after this day, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| mep | string | yes | The MEP id (e.g. "124834") or name (e.g. "Martin Sonneborn"). |
| page | integer | – | Page of votes, 25 per page, newest first (400 pages reach 10,000 votes; use from and to for older votes of a busy term). |
| to | string | – | Optional: only votes on or before this day, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| topic | string | – | Optional: only votes whose label, agenda item topic or dossier title contains these words. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_vote Get a roll-call vote ~166
Use this when you need the result of one European Parliament roll-call vote: totals, the split by political group and by country, the dossier it belongs to, and optionally how individual MEPs voted. Takes a vote id from list_votes, get_dossier or get_mep (or an epvotes.com/votes/<id> url). Set members to a group (e.g. "EPP", "S&D") or a country code (e.g. "DE", "FRA") to list those MEPs' votes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| members | string | – | Optional: list individual MEP votes for one political group or one country. "all" lists every MEP. |
| vote_id | string | yes | The numeric vote id, e.g. "198885". |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_votes List plenary votes ~207
Use this when the user asks what the European Parliament voted on a sitting day, this week, between two dates or on a subject, e.g. "what did Parliament vote today" or "votes on Ukraine in October". Without arguments it returns the latest sitting day; with only a query it searches the last 92 days. Votes are grouped by agenda item; each item has its deciding (final) vote with result and totals and the ids of its other votes for get_vote. Lists at most 40 items.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| day | string | – | One sitting day, YYYY-MM-DD. |
| from | string | – | Start of a date range, YYYY-MM-DD (with to). |
| query | string | – | Keep only agenda items whose topic, title or vote labels contain these words, e.g. "psychosocial". |
| this_week | boolean | – | All votes of the current week. |
| to | string | – | End of a date range, YYYY-MM-DD (with from). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_parliament Search the Parliament ~178
Use this when you need to find a European Parliament dossier (legislative or non-legislative procedure), an MEP, a committee, a political group or an EP document by name, topic or reference, and you do not know its id yet. Returns up to 15 matching records with their ids and epvotes.com urls; pass an id to get_dossier or get_mep next. Matches words in titles and names (e.g. "digital euro", "Metsola", "ECON", "2023/0212(COD)"). Do not use it for votes of a day; use list_votes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Words to match: a dossier title, procedure reference, MEP name, committee code or document number. |
| type | string | – | Limit the search to one kind of record. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the EP Votes MCP server?
EP Votes is a hosted endpoint at https://epvotes.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · epvotes.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-epvotes-epvotes 'https://epvotes.com/mcp'
What is the EP Votes MCP server?
EP Votes is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.epvotes/epvotes. European Parliament roll-call votes, MEP records and dossiers from official records. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://epvotes.com/mcp).
Is the EP Votes MCP server safe to use?
EP Votes scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the EP Votes MCP server expose?
EP Votes exposes 6 tools: search_parliament, list_votes, get_vote, get_dossier, get_mep, compare_groups. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,075 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the EP Votes MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to EP Votes without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the EP Votes MCP server still maintained?
EP Votes is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.