Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel

REMOTE · FILINGS.DROPWATCHHQ.COM

Fresh SEC filing intel: 8-K events, Form 4 insider activity, risk-language, filing velocity, watch.

0 this week 67 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 53% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 507 tokens (~101/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage80
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 39% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
What we tested

Checks we ran (12)

  • TLS certificate
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (1)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://filings.dropwatchhq.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=dropwatchhq.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 17 Oct 2026 15 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 2dfe2c8f366438a132acfba5c38edae
SANs: dropwatchhq.com, filings.dropwatchhq.com, *.filings.dropwatchhq.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of filings.dropwatchhq.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
dropwatchhq.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://filings.dropwatchhq.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://filings.dropwatchhq.com/mcp Served over HTTP 200
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~507 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
company_watch ~56

Given a company CIK, return recent filings, insider activity, and a filing-velocity stat (last-90 vs prior-90 days). Live-backfilled from EDGAR so it works day one.

NameTypeReqDescription
cikstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

filing_digest ~104

Digest for a filter over the last N days: material 8-K events, insider (Form 4) activity, new registrations, and periodic reports. Best summary signal for a desk.

NameTypeReqDescription
cikstring––
companystring––
daysnumber–Lookback days (default 7).
formarray––
itemstring––
minEventScorenumber––
tickerstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

insider_activity ~62

Recent Form 4/3/5 insider transactions with insider-cluster detection (multiple insiders filing on the same issuer). Optionally filter by ticker/CIK.

NameTypeReqDescription
cikstring––
daysnumber––
tickerstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_filings ~94

Direct live search of SEC EDGAR full-text for the latest filings of a form type in a date range. Use for ad-hoc lookups.

NameTypeReqDescription
endstring––
formstring–Form type, e.g. '8-K'.
limitnumber–Default 50, max 100.
qstring–Optional full-text query.
startstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

whats_new_since ~191

Return SEC filings that are NEW since a cursor token (your bookmark). Pass the cursor from a prior call to get only filings since then. Filter by form type, ticker, CIK, 8-K item code, and minimum event severity. This is the fresh-filing delta feed's core lock-in primitive. Monitoring/research over public EDGAR data — not investment advice.

NameTypeReqDescription
cikstring––
cursorstring–Opaque cursor from a previous response; omit for first call.
formarray–Form types, e.g. ['8-K','4'].
itemstring–8-K item code, e.g. '5.02'.
limitnumber–Max filings to return (default 100).
minEventScorenumber–Severity floor 1-10 (material events only).
tickerstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel MCP server?

com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel is a hosted endpoint at https://filings.dropwatchhq.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · filings.dropwatchhq.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-dropwatchhq-sec-intel 'https://filings.dropwatchhq.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel MCP server?

com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel. Fresh SEC filing intel: 8-K events, Form 4 insider activity, risk-language, filing velocity, watch. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://filings.dropwatchhq.com/mcp).

Is the com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel MCP server safe to use?

com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel MCP server expose?

com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel exposes 5 tools: whats_new_since, filing_digest, company_watch, insider_activity, search_filings. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 507 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel MCP server still maintained?

com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel, covering TLS certificate, HTTPS, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 8 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about com.dropwatchhq/sec-intel: Authorization. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.