Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

com.detentpoint/cluster-validator

NUGET · DETENTPOINT.CLUSTERVALIDATOR.MCP · SCANNED SEP 20

Read-only health validation for Windows Server failover clusters running SQL Server FCI.

+3 this week 74 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency6
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 781 tokens (~156/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management83
  • Stability observed for 25 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the com.detentpoint/cluster-validator MCP server?

com.detentpoint/cluster-validator runs locally as a NuGet package, launched with dnx DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1 --yes. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

nuget · DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add com-detentpoint-cluster-validator -- dnx DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1 --yes
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-detentpoint-cluster-validator": {
      "command": "dnx",
      "args": [
        "DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1",
        "--yes"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "com-detentpoint-cluster-validator": {
      "command": "dnx",
      "args": [
        "DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1",
        "--yes"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add com-detentpoint-cluster-validator -- dnx DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1 --yes
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-detentpoint-cluster-validator": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "dnx",
        "DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1",
        "--yes"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-detentpoint-cluster-validator:
    command: "dnx"
    args: ["DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1", "--yes"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "com-detentpoint-cluster-validator": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "dnx",
      "Arguments": [
        "DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1",
        "--yes"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-detentpoint-cluster-validator": {
      "command": "dnx",
      "args": [
        "DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1",
        "--yes"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 19 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 6 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 4 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed nuget/DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp@1.13.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem nuget
Reason Signature present, unreadable

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~781 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
export_cluster_report ~54

Return the path to the HTML report for a run, if Test-Cluster produced one (it exists only when the TestCluster phase ran and succeeded). Returns null otherwise.

NameTypeReqDescription
runIdstringyesThe runId.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_phase_findings ~102

Return the subset of a run's findings filtered by phase and/or category. Useful to drill into one phase (e.g. 'Storage') or one error category (e.g. 'StorageTopologyError').

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring|nullOptional category filter (e.g. StorageTopologyError).
phasestring|nullOptional phase name filter (e.g. Storage, Quorum, Identity).
runIdstringyesThe runId.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_phases ~82

List all 16 phases and their cost profile (which require an existing cluster, which are long-running, which is automatic) BEFORE starting a run. PreFlight is marked automatic=true — it always runs first and is not opt-in; the other 15 are the validation phases. TestCluster is the long-running phase. Informational only; no runId needed.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_validation_result ~154

Poll a validation run by runId. Returns status (Queued/Running/Completed/Failed), phasesCompleted/phasesTotal (phasesTotal is 16; phasesCompleted counts phases that have reported at least one finding and reaches 16 on completion — skipped phases still report a skip note), currentPhase, the findings accumulated so far (they stream during the run), and exitCode on completion (0=clean, 1=any Fail). Returns null if the runId is unknown or evicted (24h retention). Validation completes within 15 minutes under normal conditions; stop polling after 20 calls and treat as failed if still Running.

NameTypeReqDescription
runIdstringyesThe runId returned by run_cluster_validation.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

run_cluster_validation ~389

Start a read-only SQL FCI failover-cluster health validation. Returns a runId IMMEDIATELY and runs asynchronously — validation is long-running (minutes); Test-Cluster is the long pole. Poll get_validation_result with the runId for streamed, phase-by-phase findings. The validator never changes cluster state.

NameTypeReqDescription
expectedDiskCountintegerExpected shared-disk count per node. 0 (default) reports the count without pass/fail; a positive value Fails any node whose shared-disk count differs.
nodesarrayyesCluster node names (2 to 16).
remotingDomainstringDomain for remote CIM/AD credentials (e.g. sqlspnlab). Leave blank on a domain-joined management host.
remotingPasswordstringPassword for remote CIM/AD credentials. Lab/test use only — passed over local stdio.
remotingUserstringUsername for remote CIM/AD credentials. Lab/test use only — passed over local stdio.
reportPathstringDirectory for the HTML/JSON/transcript report triad. Optional.
stagestringLifecycle hint: Auto (default), Cluster, or PreCluster.
strictarray|nullStrict areas to promote Warn->Fail: any of Mpio, Heartbeat, Hotfix, ServiceAccount, Affinity, Network, LunHygiene, Identity.
vCenterCredentialSecretNamestringOptional SecretManagement secret NAME holding read-only vCenter credentials (resolved locally via Get-Secret). Leave blank to connect with the tool's current identity.
vCenterServerstringOptional vCenter/ESXi server FQDN to enable the VMware DRS anti-affinity phase (Phase 11). Leave blank to skip it. Requires VMware PowerCLI installed on this host.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the com.detentpoint/cluster-validator MCP server?

com.detentpoint/cluster-validator is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.detentpoint/cluster-validator. Read-only health validation for Windows Server failover clusters running SQL Server FCI. This page covers its NuGet package (DetentPoint.ClusterValidator.Mcp).

Is the com.detentpoint/cluster-validator MCP server safe to use?

com.detentpoint/cluster-validator scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the com.detentpoint/cluster-validator MCP server expose?

com.detentpoint/cluster-validator exposes 5 tools: run_cluster_validation, get_phases, export_cluster_report, get_validation_result, get_phase_findings. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 781 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the com.detentpoint/cluster-validator MCP server still maintained?

com.detentpoint/cluster-validator is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.