Decionis Commerce Gate MCP
NPM · @DECIONIS/COMMERCE
Commerce preflights, D365 authorization; opt-in agent writes require authorized backend connectors.
Available components
Last scanned (21 hours ago)
Scores higher than 54% of npm servers
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security99
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 1 of 28 dependencies flagged as unhealthy (1 deprecated). View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
- Repository check failed: no source repository is declared. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
- Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1841 tokens (~230/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage95
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 86% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (15)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (1)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Security disclosure in Provenance & TransparencySecurity-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.3.0 functional
- 31 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- Dependency health: 1.00 → 0.93 ▼ functional
- 30 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 24 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 23 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 17 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 15 Oct 26 −16
- Stability: 0.90 → unverified ▼ security
- Known CVEs: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Source repository: pass → fail ▼ security
- Provenance: pass → fail ▼ security
- The attested source repository moved: decionis/agent-safe-pipeline security
- Tool coverage: 92% → 85% ▼ functional
- Dependency health: 1.00 → unverified ▼ functional
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Security disclosure: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- Schema quality: excellent → good functional
- Package version: 0.1.6 → 0.2.0 functional
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@decionis/commerce@0.3.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 28 packages
| Packages resolved | 28 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
commercegate_describe_capabilities Describe Commerce Gate Capabilities ~168
Use this first, or when someone asks 'can you check prices, Walmart orders, refunds, or a marketplace offer against our policy?'. It lists the eleven commerce-action preflights, including the four finance families of the opt-in commerce-preflight-v2 contract that requires a matching backend, the Walmart connection and order-path mappings, the separate Dynamics 365 guard, and the Microsoft Partner Center and AWS Marketplace SaaS offer-submission preflight. It also explains PROCEED, HOLD, and BLOCK, configuration, evidence tools, and the requirements for optional agent write proposals. Its non-writing guarantees apply to the eight default tools. This local diagnostic never calls the Decionis API, reveals credentials, or confirms that a backend or platform connector is ready to execute an action.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
commercegate_evaluate_action Evaluate a Commerce Action ~419
Use this as the default preflight before a price, inventory, order-acceptance, fulfillment, promotion, refund, return, payment-release, vendor-bank-change, early-payment-discount, or credit-hold-release proposal, for questions like 'would repricing this SKU to $89 on Walmart still clear our margin floor after the referral fee?', 'is it safe to accept this 40-unit order with the stock we have left?', or 'can the support bot refund $2,850 on this order?'. It sends the bounded tenant-scoped action and policy signals to Decionis in default SHADOW mode and may persist a signed Decision Dossier. Shadow Mode evaluates real supplied facts without blocking the native commerce flow; it is not a synthetic-data mode. A customer-activated native executor enforces a supported connector path separately. This tool is a generic Protocol evaluation: it never calls a marketplace API, executes the proposal, or confirms that a connector exposes the required write path. The source-candidate preflight option requests all sixteen commerce-preflight-v2 checks from a matching backend and fails closed if the complete request-bound result is absent. The four finance families are part of that included candidate: they require the matching backend, evaluate in SHADOW only, and never move money through this tool. The result maps to PROCEED, HOLD, or BLOCK: APPROVE is evidence, not consent to execute; REJECT means stop; REVIEW or ESCALATE means hold for a human.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | – | yes | The complete, normalized commerce action proposed for shadow evaluation. |
| agent_attribution | object | – | Optional: what you, the agent, report about producing this action. Decionis records it on the Decision Dossier as client-reported and unverified; it is never a policy fact and never changes the answe… |
| policy_version | string | – | Optional exact Decionis policy version. Omit to use the tenant default. |
| preflight | object | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
commercegate_evaluate_marketplace_offer_submission Preflight a Marketplace SaaS Offer Submission ~227
Use this before manually submitting a Commerce Gate SaaS offer in Microsoft Partner Center or AWS Marketplace. It requires a bounded offer, plan and market packet, public HTTPS listing and technical URLs, platform identity, preview or test confirmation, and digest-bound release evidence. Microsoft packets require Microsoft Entra tenant and application IDs; AWS packets require a Login with Amazon subject bound to the seller AWS account and IAM role. This is a non-writing preflight: it evaluates release metadata and preview or test evidence without reading customer commerce records, calling either marketplace, uploading an artifact, creating or changing an offer, or submitting the offer for review. PROCEED is policy evidence, not authority or consent to submit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| policy_version | string | – | Optional exact Decionis policy version. Omit to use the tenant default. |
| submission | object | yes | A bounded, digest-backed packet for manual Microsoft Partner Center or AWS Marketplace SaaS offer submission. This non-writing preflight uses release metadata and preview or test evidence; it does no… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
commercegate_get_dossier Get a Commerce Gate Decision Dossier ~95
Use this to answer 'why was that order held?' or 'what policy version decided that price change?' by reading the signed Decision Dossier for a known dossier UUID within the environment-bound organization. This is a tenant read; it never executes or modifies a commerce action and it fails closed when credentials are absent or invalid.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dossier_id | string | yes | UUID returned by commercegate_evaluate_action or a shadow report. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
commercegate_get_proof_packet Get a Commerce Gate Proof Packet ~80
Use this when finance or an auditor asks for signed evidence by fetching the proof packet for a known dossier UUID in the environment-bound organization. The tool is read-only, performs no marketplace action, and never treats successful verification as permission to execute.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dossier_id | string | yes | UUID returned by commercegate_evaluate_action or a shadow report. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
commercegate_list_shadow_reports List Commerce Gate Shadow Reports ~115
Use this to answer 'what would Shadow Mode have held recently?' by listing recent SHADOW evaluations in the environment-bound organization across price, inventory, order, fulfillment, promotion, refund, and return proposals. Results describe what policy would have done; they do not report marketplace execution and must not be interpreted as authority to mutate commerce state.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | integer | – | Report window in days. The API default is 30. |
| limit | integer | – | Maximum report rows to inspect. The API default is 20. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
commercegate_summarize_shadow_reports Summarize Commerce Gate Shadow Reports ~114
Use this for 'how much would we have caught this month?' style questions: aggregate SHADOW outcomes, near misses, and policy mismatches for the environment-bound organization, so an operator can judge whether to turn enforcement on. It is a read-only operational summary; it neither changes enforcement mode nor executes any commerce action.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | integer | – | Report window in days. The API default is 30. |
| limit | integer | – | Maximum report rows to inspect. The API default is 20. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
commercegate_validate_erp_transaction Validate an ERP Transaction ~159
Use this for a fully formed Dynamics 365 Business Central or Finance and Supply Chain Management transaction that needs central enforced authorization. Commerce Gate evaluates line economics first and, only after policy clears, atomically authorizes the agent budget before returning the binary ALLOW or BLOCK decision used by the ERP enforcement shell. The tool can reserve budget and returns a reason-coded validation response; unlike the Shadow evaluator, it does not promise a retrievable dossier. It never writes, posts, releases, or modifies the ERP transaction itself. ALLOW is authorization evidence for the exact transaction, not user consent to perform the ERP write.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| erp_region | string | yes | ERP deployment region sent as X-ERP-Region. |
| request | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Decionis Commerce Gate MCP server?
Decionis Commerce Gate MCP runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @decionis/commerce. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @decionis/commerce
claude mcp add com-decionis-commerce-gate -- npx -y @decionis/commerce
What is the Decionis Commerce Gate MCP server?
Decionis Commerce Gate MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as com.decionis/commerce-gate. Commerce preflights, D365 authorization; opt-in agent writes require authorized backend connectors. This page covers its npm package (@decionis/commerce).
Is the Decionis Commerce Gate MCP server safe to use?
Decionis Commerce Gate MCP scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Decionis Commerce Gate MCP server expose?
Decionis Commerce Gate MCP exposes 8 tools: commercegate_describe_capabilities, commercegate_validate_erp_transaction, commercegate_evaluate_action, commercegate_get_dossier, commercegate_get_proof_packet, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,377 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Decionis Commerce Gate MCP server still maintained?
Decionis Commerce Gate MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Decionis Commerce Gate MCP server under?
Decionis Commerce Gate MCP declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Decionis Commerce Gate MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 15 checks on Decionis Commerce Gate MCP, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 11 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Decionis Commerce Gate MCP: Security disclosure. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.