Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Decionis CommerceGate MCP

NPM · @DECIONIS/COMMERCE · SCANNED SEP 21

Commerce preflights, D365 authorization, signed evidence, and reports; no marketplace or ERP writes.

Available components

+3 this week 86 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to decionis/agent-safe-pipeline). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 11 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1174 tokens (~167/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management40
  • Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 90% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the Decionis CommerceGate MCP server?

Decionis CommerceGate MCP runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @decionis/commerce. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @decionis/commerce

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add com-decionis-commerce-gate -- npx -y @decionis/commerce
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-decionis-commerce-gate": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@decionis/commerce"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "com-decionis-commerce-gate": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@decionis/commerce"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add com-decionis-commerce-gate -- npx -y @decionis/commerce
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-decionis-commerce-gate": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "@decionis/commerce"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add com-decionis-commerce-gate --command npx --arg -y --arg @decionis/commerce
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-decionis-commerce-gate:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "@decionis/commerce"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "com-decionis-commerce-gate": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "@decionis/commerce"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add com-decionis-commerce-gate -t stdio -c npx -a -y @decionis/commerce
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-decionis-commerce-gate": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@decionis/commerce"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Sept 26 +15
    • Known CVEs: pass → unverified security
    • Provenance: fail → pass security
    • Source repository: fail → pass security
    • The attested source repository moved: decionis/agent-safe-pipeline security
    • Tool coverage: 100% → 90% functional
    • Dependency health: pass → unverified functional
    • Schema quality: pass → fail functional
    • Security disclosure: unverified → pass functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 functional
    • Schema quality: good → excellent functional
    • Package version: 0.1.1 → 0.1.3 functional
    • Package version: 0.1.1 → 0.1.2 functional
  • 9 Sept 26 66

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@decionis/commerce@0.1.3

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo decionis/agent-safe-pipeline
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/decionis/agent-safe-pipeline/.github/workflows/commerce-mcp-npm-publish.yml@refs/heads/master
Rekor log index 2777684681
Predicate type https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:e286e6730ea63ba8638dd636ecd51bd927ec590064a6b2a18bbc031487cbfd52fa0ea25a99671b021990caca123f7c41eccc27f4d5acfc1c22df0ea3a

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~911 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
commercegate_describe_capabilities ~119

Use this first, or when someone asks 'can you check prices, orders or refunds against our policy?'. It lists the seven kinds of commerce action CommerceGate can check in Shadow Mode: price changes, inventory updates, order acceptance, fulfillment steps, promotion changes, refund requests, and return authorizations. It also explains PROCEED, HOLD, and BLOCK, tenant connection state, and available evidence tools. This local diagnostic never calls the Decionis API, reveals credentials, or claims that a platform connector can execute an action.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

commercegate_evaluate_action ~229

Use this as the default preflight before a price, inventory, order-acceptance, fulfillment, promotion, refund, or return proposal, for questions like 'would repricing this SKU to $89 on Walmart still clear our margin floor after the referral fee?', 'is it safe to accept this 40-unit order with the stock we have left?', or 'can the support bot refund $2,850 on this order?'. It sends the bounded canonical action and policy signals to Decionis in SHADOW mode and may persist a signed Decision Dossier. This is a generic Protocol evaluation: it never calls a marketplace API, executes the proposal, or confirms that a connector exposes the required write path. The result maps to PROCEED, HOLD, or BLOCK: APPROVE is evidence, not consent to execute; REJECT means stop; REVIEW or ESCALATE means hold for a human.

NameTypeReqDescription
actionyesThe complete, normalized commerce action proposed for shadow evaluation.
policy_versionstringOptional exact Decionis policy version. Omit to use the tenant default.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

commercegate_get_dossier ~95

Use this to answer 'why was that order held?' or 'what policy version decided that price change?' by reading the signed Decision Dossier for a known dossier UUID within the environment-bound organization. This is a tenant read; it never executes or modifies a commerce action and it fails closed when credentials are absent or invalid.

NameTypeReqDescription
dossier_idstringyesUUID returned by commercegate_evaluate_action or a shadow report.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

commercegate_get_proof_packet ~80

Use this when finance or an auditor asks for signed evidence by fetching the proof packet for a known dossier UUID in the environment-bound organization. The tool is read-only, performs no marketplace action, and never treats successful verification as permission to execute.

NameTypeReqDescription
dossier_idstringyesUUID returned by commercegate_evaluate_action or a shadow report.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

commercegate_list_shadow_reports ~115

Use this to answer 'what would Shadow Mode have held recently?' by listing recent SHADOW evaluations in the environment-bound organization across price, inventory, order, fulfillment, promotion, refund, and return proposals. Results describe what policy would have done; they do not report marketplace execution and must not be interpreted as authority to mutate commerce state.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysintegerReport window in days. The API default is 30.
limitintegerMaximum report rows to inspect. The API default is 20.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

commercegate_summarize_shadow_reports ~114

Use this for 'how much would we have caught this month?' style questions: aggregate SHADOW outcomes, near misses, and policy mismatches for the environment-bound organization, so an operator can judge whether to turn enforcement on. It is a read-only operational summary; it neither changes enforcement mode nor executes any commerce action.

NameTypeReqDescription
daysintegerReport window in days. The API default is 30.
limitintegerMaximum report rows to inspect. The API default is 20.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

commercegate_validate_erp_transaction ~159

Use this for a fully formed Dynamics 365 Business Central or Finance and Supply Chain Management transaction that needs central enforced authorization. CommerceGate evaluates line economics first and, only after policy clears, atomically authorizes the agent budget before returning the binary ALLOW or BLOCK decision used by the ERP enforcement shell. The tool can reserve budget and returns a reason-coded validation response; unlike the Shadow evaluator, it does not promise a retrievable dossier. It never writes, posts, releases, or modifies the ERP transaction itself. ALLOW is authorization evidence for the exact transaction, not user consent to perform the ERP write.

NameTypeReqDescription
erp_regionstringyesERP deployment region sent as X-ERP-Region.
requestobjectyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Decionis CommerceGate MCP server?

Decionis CommerceGate MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as com.decionis/commerce-gate. Commerce preflights, D365 authorization, signed evidence, and reports; no marketplace or ERP writes. This page covers its npm package (@decionis/commerce).

Is the Decionis CommerceGate MCP server safe to use?

Decionis CommerceGate MCP scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 21 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Decionis CommerceGate MCP server expose?

Decionis CommerceGate MCP exposes 7 tools: commercegate_describe_capabilities, commercegate_validate_erp_transaction, commercegate_evaluate_action, commercegate_get_dossier, commercegate_get_proof_packet, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 911 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Decionis CommerceGate MCP server still maintained?

Decionis CommerceGate MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Decionis CommerceGate MCP server under?

Decionis CommerceGate MCP declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.