Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Dataville

NPM · @DATAVILLE/DATAVILLE-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS

SEC filings, Wikipedia, arXiv, US Census and more for AI agents, with every answer source-linked.

+3 this week 90 Trust /100

Last scanned (19 hours ago)

Scores higher than 93% of npm servers

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 92 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to datavilleorg/dataville-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 22 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 660 tokens (~165/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
  • Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +3
    • Stability: unverified → 0.27 ▲ functional
  • 14 Oct 26 +32
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window). security
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: fail functional
    • First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
    • First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
    • First check of Schema quality: fail functional
    • First check of Schema quality: excellent functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@dataville/dataville-mcp@0.1.8

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo datavilleorg/dataville-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/datavilleorg/dataville-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.8
Rekor log index 3233477771
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:a993da0235b5cf8dd0297bda559645788d3e7b6060c2e76ef5eff444568c879811b0f9482406b998cc0e2e9fa703bd005cccc906ad0635b8f9986c070

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 92 packages
Packages resolved 92
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~550 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
describe_dataville_source ~79

Show how to use one data source: what search_dataville expects as keywords (with an example that returns a result), and the SQL tables and columns query_dataville can read for it. Sources with no tables can only be searched.

NameTypeReqDescription
sourcestringyesData source name from list_dataville_sources, e.g. 'edgar'

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_dataville_sources ~53

List every Dataville data source with a one-line description and the SQL tables (if any) that query_dataville can read for it. Call describe_dataville_source for a source's keyword format and table columns.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

query_dataville ~243

Run a read-only SQL SELECT (DuckDB dialect) over Dataville's stored tables: wiki, arxiv, gutenberg, fooddata, pwc_methods, pwc_datasets, edgar, openalex, pypi, stackexchange. Use it to list, filter (WHERE … ILIKE '%term%'), sort, count, aggregate, or join across sources, and page through results with LIMIT/OFFSET. Get each table's columns from describe_dataville_source. Only SELECT is allowed; at most 1,000 rows are returned (a missing LIMIT becomes LIMIT 1000); queries time out after 30 s. Billed per row returned, so keep LIMIT as small as the task allows. The tables hold Dataville's stored copy: some sources are loaded in bulk, others only hold records fetched before, so a row missing here may still exist upstream — fall back to search_dataville for a specific item.

NameTypeReqDescription
sqlstringyesA single SELECT statement, e.g. "SELECT company_name, form_type, filing_date FROM edgar WHERE company_name ILIKE '%apple%' ORDER BY filing_date DESC LIMIT 10"

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_dataville ~175

Look up one thing in a Dataville data source by keywords and get back the single best-matching record (full text in `body`, structured fields in `metadata`). Use describe_dataville_source to see what keywords a source expects. To get many records, filter, or page through results, use query_dataville instead.

NameTypeReqDescription
keywordsstringyesSearch keywords or identifier, e.g. a title, ticker, or package name
paramsobject–Extra query-string parameters passed through to the API as-is. Most callers need none.
sourcestringyesData source name, e.g. 'wikipedia', 'arxiv', 'edgar' (see list_dataville_sources)
summaryboolean–If true, truncate `body` to its first 100 characters to save tokens

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Dataville MCP server?

Dataville runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @dataville/dataville-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @dataville/dataville-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add com-dataville-dataville-mcp -- npx -y @dataville/dataville-mcp
Common questions

What is the Dataville MCP server?

Dataville is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.dataville/dataville-mcp. SEC filings, Wikipedia, arXiv, US Census and more for AI agents, with every answer source-linked. This page covers its npm package (@dataville/dataville-mcp).

Is the Dataville MCP server safe to use?

Dataville scores 90 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Dataville MCP server expose?

Dataville exposes 4 tools: list_dataville_sources, describe_dataville_source, search_dataville, query_dataville. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 550 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Dataville MCP server still maintained?

Dataville is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Dataville MCP server under?

Dataville declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.