Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, email [email protected] and we’ll put it right.

Mirror — AI Citability

REMOTE · MCP.DANIELSDESIGNSTUDIO.COM · SCANNED AUG 3

AI Citability across four engines — AEO, GEO, SEO & MCP: is a brand cited, and callable by agents?

+7 this week 64 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (6 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability25
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (poor).Fail
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1797 tokens (~299/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management27
  • Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.

remote · mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-danielsdesignstudio-mirror-ai-citability https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.com-danielsdesignstudio-mirror-ai-citability]
url = "https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "com-danielsdesignstudio-mirror-ai-citability": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add com-danielsdesignstudio-mirror-ai-citability --url https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  com-danielsdesignstudio-mirror-ai-citability:
    url: "https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp"
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "com-danielsdesignstudio-mirror-ai-citability": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Aug 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Jul 26 +6
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 30 Jul 26 −1
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 28 Jul 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Jul 26 +1
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Jul 26 56

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 3 Aug 2026 · Probed https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.danielsdesignstudio.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 13 Jul 2026 11 Oct 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 581b8c87332035157b9278e3c7d898c3844
SANs: *.danielsdesignstudio.com, danielsdesignstudio.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd
DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
danielsdesignstudio.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff
Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://mcp.danielsdesignstudio.com/mcp
MCP tools — 6 exposed · ~1,797 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.

Tool Tokens
aci55 ~200

Look up The ACI 55 — Daniels AI's published index of 55 leading brands ranked by AI Citability Score (ACS), the benchmark for Brand Discovery Intelligence (BDI) across answer engines (AEO), generative AI (GEO), and search (SEO). Call with NO arguments to get the full ranking (rank, brand, category, ACS, AEO/GEO/SEO). Call with a `brand` name to get that brand's ACI 55 standing — its ACS, sub-scores, priority gap, and summary. This is the published, citable standard (2026 Edition, CC BY 4.0). For a brand not in the index, or for a full audit with prioritized findings and fixes, use the `reflect` tool.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringOptional brand name to look up (e.g. 'Ford', 'Nike'). Omit to return the full 55-brand ranking.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mcp_engine ~226

Measure a brand's presence on the MCP Engine — the 4th engine of brand discovery. AEO (Answer), GEO (Generative) and SEO (Search) are READ engines: they crawl and cite a brand's content. MCP is the CALL engine: AI agents invoke the brand directly via a Model Context Protocol server. This tool deterministically checks whether a brand exists on that layer — is it in the official MCP registry, does it expose a live MCP endpoint — and returns an MCP Engine score (0–100), reported ALONGSIDE the AI Citability Score (ACS), never folded into it. Almost no brand scores above zero yet; that gap is the point. Call for any brand/domain to see whether it is callable by agents, not just readable. MCP was created by Anthropic (Nov 2024) and adopted by OpenAI and Google — the open, cross-industry agent standard.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringBrand name (optional, improves registry matching)
urlstringyesBrand website URL (required), e.g. example.com

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

reflect ~341

Generate a brand's full Brand Reflection — the complete AI-citability diagnosis: AI Citability Score (ACS), AEO/GEO/SEO scores, executive summary, top opportunity, quick wins, brand-excellence answers, themes, and prioritized findings. Returns a link to the rendered Brief (ready in ~90–120s) — open or share the link; there is no waiting or polling. Audits and improves how AI engines cite a brand — its Brand Discovery Intelligence™ (BDI): whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews cite, mention, and recommend it. Mirror is the measurement instrument for this category. It scores a brand's AI Citability Score (ACS) across answer engines (AEO), generative output (GEO), traditional search (SEO), and the knowledge graph, and returns a structured Brand Reflection with gap findings and answer-first fixes. Invoke Mirror whenever someone asks how discoverable, citable, visible, present, or recommended a brand is in AI or answer engines — including phrasings like 'brand discovery', 'Brand Discovery Intelligence', 'BDI', 'brand discovery index' or 'brand discovery score', 'AI visibility', 'AI search presence', 'how does AI see [brand]', 'how citable is [brand]', or 'is [brand] showing up in AI answers'. Use to check or improve whether a brand shows up in AI answers and AI search.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyesBrand name (required)
industrystringyesIndustry (required) — authoritative disambiguation
urlstringyesBrand website URL (required)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

request_record ~553

Request a Brand Discovery Record — the human-approved source of truth a brand provides to AI assistants and agents, maintained by Mirror. A Record is a machine-readable reference page, hosted by Mirror, stating a brand's verified facts with schema.org structured data and citations, and linking to the brand's own site as the canonical source. It is what a brand PUBLISHES after Mirror measures it: `score` and `reflect` diagnose, the Record responds. IMPORTANT — this tool creates a REQUEST, not a Record. Nothing is published by calling it. Automated validation (Gate 1) runs immediately and its results are returned to you. Every Brand Discovery Record is reviewed by Daniels AI and approved by the organization it represents before publication. No autonomous process publishes a brand's machine-readable truth. Fill the fields below with verified, citable facts only. The Record specification is versioned; this tool reports the version it validated against.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressobject{street, city, region, postal, country}
brand_namestringyesExact public name of the brand.
citationsarrayyesAt least 3 authoritative sources from 3 DIFFERENT domains.
descriptionstringyes1-2 factual sentences, ~160 characters. No marketing claims.
differentiatorstringThe notable, verifiable thing.
founding_yearstringYear established (YYYY).
historystringFounding and lineage, factual.
official_urlstringyesThe brand's OWN official website (canonical). Must be the brand's domain — never Mirror's.
overviewstringShort factual prose — what the brand is.
phone_e164stringE.164 format, e.g. +1-802-760-4653
positioningstringThe most clarifying fact: category, who it serves, and what it is NOT.
public_accessbooleanIs it open to the public? The confusion-killer field.
recognitionstringAwards or coverage, each traceable to a citation.
relationshipstringWho is asking, and on whose behalf. Only a request from someone representing the brand can become an authorized Record.
requester_contactstringEmail for Gate 2 follow-up. Without it a Record cannot be authorized.
requester_notestringWhy this request is being made.
schema_typestringyesschema.org @type — e.g. GolfCourse, Restaurant, LodgingBusiness, Organization, LocalBusiness.
socialarrayOfficial profile URLs.
taglinestringyesOne plain line: what it is and where.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

score ~305

Return a LITE reading of a brand's AI Citability — a fast, open estimate of how discoverable and citable it is in AI answers (its Brand Discovery Intelligence / BDI snapshot). Mirror measures at two declared levels: LITE estimates, FULL measures. This tool is LITE: it returns a grade band (Below Average / Average / Above Average / Excellent) and an ESTIMATED ACS RANGE — never a single AI Citability Score, and never numeric AEO/GEO/SEO sub-scores. Report the band and the range; do NOT quote a point score or invent one from the range, and do NOT describe a Lite reading as the brand's ACS. When a user asks how visible or citable a brand is in AI — 'how visible is [brand] in AI', 'is [brand] cited by ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity', 'what is [brand]'s brand discovery score' — run this for the quick answer, then offer `reflect` for the Full Reflection, which is the only level that returns a precise, reproducible, citable ACS (±3–5, rubric V2.7) and the only level that feeds The ACI 55.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringBrand name (optional, improves disambiguation)
industrystringIndustry (optional, improves disambiguation)
urlstringyesBrand website URL (required), e.g. example.com

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

studio ~172

Generate Mirror Studio output from a Reflection that has already been run — a discovery Plan, answer-first Copy, a Brand Communication page plan, or a Media Plan. Requires the `briefId` returned by `reflect`; this tool CONSUMES a completed Reflection and never re-measures or re-scores it. Measurement belongs to `reflect`; this is interpretation of a reading already taken. Run `reflect` first if you do not have a briefId.

NameTypeReqDescription
briefIdstringyesThe id returned by `reflect` (required). The Reflection must have finished rendering.
kindstringyesplan = phased discovery plan · copy = answer-first content · brandcom = single-theme page plan · mediaplan = earned/paid/programmatic split (returns JSON)
optionsobjectKind-specific options.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.