Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?)

REMOTE · CONQUEIA.COM

Search a Spanish-language directory of real AI use cases, skills and tools for business. Read-only.

Available components

+4 this week 86 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 92% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 7 Nov 2026.

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 602 tokens (~120/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
  • Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 7 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 6 Nov 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 1 Nov 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 30 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Probed https://conqueia.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=conqueia.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 15 Oct 2026 13 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 61564abf4246493a69f1d31e54d0e8a6282
SANs: conqueia.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of conqueia.com. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
conqueia.com. DS published 34126 8 Verified
conqueia.com. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://conqueia.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://conqueia.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://conqueia.com/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~444 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
buscar ~168

Busca en el directorio ¿Con qué IA? (conqueia.com) casos reales de uso de IA, skills, apps, herramientas y guías, todo en español. Devuelve título, resumen y URL de cada ficha, de la más a la menos relevante.

NameTypeReqDescription
consultastringyesQué buscas, con palabras clave o en lenguaje natural: «facturas», «atender clientes por WhatsApp», «Claude Code».
limiteinteger–Máximo de fichas. Por defecto 10, máximo 50.
temastring–Limita a un tema, por su slug: por ejemplo «ventas» o «marketing-y-anuncios».
tipostring–Limita a un tipo de ficha: caso, skill, app, herramienta o guia.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

novedades ~33

Lo nuevo en IA de los últimos 30 días (modelos, funciones y herramientas), explicado en español y con su URL.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

recomendar ~66

Recibe la tarea del usuario («quiero contestar reseñas de Google más rápido») y devuelve las 5 fichas, casos reales y herramientas, que mejor encajan, con por qué encajan.

NameTypeReqDescription
tareastringyesLo que quiere hacer el usuario, con sus palabras.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

temas ~39

Lista los temas del directorio (ventas, atención al cliente, facturas…), con cuántas fichas tiene cada uno, su slug y su URL.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

ver_ficha ~138

Devuelve una ficha entera en markdown: qué hicieron, cómo salió, pasos, el prompt para copiar, precios, pros y contras, fuentes… según el tipo. Recibe la URL de la ficha en conqueia.com, o su tipo y su slug.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstring–Identificador de la ficha, si no tienes la URL: el final de su dirección.
tipostring–Tipo de ficha, si no tienes la URL. «novedad» sirve para las novedades.
urlstring–Dirección de la ficha, por ejemplo https://conqueia.com/caso/<slug>.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) MCP server?

Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) is a hosted endpoint at https://conqueia.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · conqueia.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-conqueia-conqueia 'https://conqueia.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) MCP server?

Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.conqueia/conqueia. Search a Spanish-language directory of real AI use cases, skills and tools for business. Read-only. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://conqueia.com/mcp).

Is the Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) MCP server safe to use?

Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) MCP server expose?

Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) exposes 5 tools: buscar, ver_ficha, recomendar, novedades, temas. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 444 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) MCP server still maintained?

Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?) MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Conqueia (¿Con qué IA?), covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.