Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Coghelm: AI tools for leaders

REMOTE · COGHELM.COM

Curated AI tools for leaders: recommend and compare tools by job, plus 1:1 and board templates.

Available components

+4 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 85% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1023 tokens (~102/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
  • Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage95
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 85% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://coghelm.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=coghelm.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 14 Oct 2026 12 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5131e92257d3b93dbe8638ab124fa88d5fe
SANs: *.coghelm.com, coghelm.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of coghelm.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
coghelm.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://coghelm.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://coghelm.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://coghelm.com/mcp
MCP tools · 10 exposed · ~886 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
compare_tools ~76

Compare 2-6 Coghelm tools by slug (e.g. ['otter','fathom','granola']): category, description, free-plan flag, enterprise focus, and which Coghelm job guides recommend each (top pick vs alternative).

NameTypeReqDescription
slugsarrayyesTool slugs from search_tools or get_tool

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

draft_1on1_agenda ~169

Draft a structured 1:1 agenda (Markdown) for a manager and a direct report, time-boxed to the meeting length. Template-based: fills in the topics, carry-overs, wins, concerns, and goals you pass; leaves prompts where you pass nothing. Puts the report's topics first.

NameTypeReqDescription
carryovers––Open items from last 1:1
concerns––Concerns or blockers to discuss
goals––Growth or career goals to touch on
meeting_minutesinteger–Meeting length, default 30
report_rolestring–Role of the report, e.g. 'senior engineer' (no names needed)
topics––Topics the report raised
wins––Wins to recognize

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

draft_board_update_outline ~170

Draft a board/exec update outline (Markdown) with the proven structure: headline, asks first, numbers vs plan, wins, misses, risks, outlook. Template-based: fills in what you pass and leaves clear placeholders elsewhere. Never invents numbers.

NameTypeReqDescription
asks––Decisions or help needed
audiencestring–e.g. 'board', 'exec team'
headlinestring––
metrics––Key metrics with actual vs plan
misses––Misses
org_typestring–e.g. 'nonprofit', 'Series A startup', 'university department'
periodstring–e.g. 'quarterly', 'monthly', 'Q3 2026'
risks––Risks
wins––Wins

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_job_guide ~41

Get a full job guide by slug: intro, top pick and why, alternatives, how-to steps, and FAQ.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_offer ~57

Machine-readable offer for the Leader's AI Playbook: $29 USD one-time, digital PDF, 30-day full refund, terms URL, support email, and a Stripe buy URL. Purchases must be completed by the human at checkout.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_tool ~46

Get details for one tool by slug (e.g. 'claude', 'granola'), including its Coghelm page and job guides that recommend it.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_jobs ~39

List Coghelm's job guides (jobs leaders do, like running 1:1s or writing a board update), each with its top pick tool.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

playbook_preview ~51

Preview Coghelm's Leader's AI Playbook (PDF): table of contents, what each chapter contains, two sample prompts, and the offer summary. Use when a user wants deeper prompts/templates for leadership work.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

recommend_tools ~172

Recommend AI tools for a job a leader needs done (e.g. 'run better 1:1s', 'write a board update', 'research a competitor', 'grant writing'), using Coghelm's curated job guides and directory. Optional constraints: budget ('free' keeps only tools with a known free plan; 'low' ranks free plans first) and team size (small teams rank enterprise tools last). Returns ranked tools with reasons, pricing notes, and Coghelm links.

NameTypeReqDescription
budgetstring–Budget constraint; default 'any'
jobstringyesThe job to be done, in plain words, or a job guide slug from list_jobs
limitinteger–Max recommendations, default 5
team_sizeinteger–Number of people who would use the tool

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_tools ~65

Search Coghelm's curated AI tools for leaders (and job guides) by keyword, e.g. 'meeting notes', 'grant writing', 'slides'.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional category slug filter
limitinteger––
querystringyesKeywords

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Coghelm: AI tools for leaders MCP server?

Coghelm: AI tools for leaders is a hosted endpoint at https://coghelm.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · coghelm.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-coghelm-coghelm 'https://coghelm.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Coghelm: AI tools for leaders MCP server?

Coghelm: AI tools for leaders is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.coghelm/coghelm. Curated AI tools for leaders: recommend and compare tools by job, plus 1:1 and board templates. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://coghelm.com/mcp).

Is the Coghelm: AI tools for leaders MCP server safe to use?

Coghelm: AI tools for leaders scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Coghelm: AI tools for leaders MCP server expose?

Coghelm: AI tools for leaders exposes 10 tools: search_tools, get_tool, list_jobs, get_job_guide, recommend_tools, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 886 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Coghelm: AI tools for leaders MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Coghelm: AI tools for leaders without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Coghelm: AI tools for leaders MCP server still maintained?

Coghelm: AI tools for leaders is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.