Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

CodeTrendy

REMOTE · CODETRENDY.COM

Search the CodeTrendy directory of websites and tools. Read-only, no API key.

Available components

+3 this week 80 Trust /100

Last scanned (20 hours ago)

Scores higher than 81% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1233 tokens (~176/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
  • Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://codetrendy.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=codetrendy.com CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 10 Sept 2026 9 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5eb7bf9e7d0bcd6e74bc476e47287c51a77
SANs: *.codetrendy.com, codetrendy.com
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of codetrendy.com. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
codetrendy.com. present 2371 13 Verified
codetrendy.com. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://www.google.com https://www.gstatic.com https://static.cloudflareinsights.com https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com https://partner.googleadservices.com https://tpc.googlesyndication.com https://adservice.google.com https://www.googletagservices.com https://ep1.adtrafficquality.google https://ep2.adtrafficquality.google https://fundingchoicesmessages.google.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self' data: https: blob:; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://www.google.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://region1.google-analytics.com https://cloudflareinsights.com https://api.openreplay.com wss://api.openreplay.com https://*.ingest.us.sentry.io https://*.ingest.de.sentry.io https://*.ingest.sentry.io https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net ht
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://codetrendy.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://codetrendy.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://codetrendy.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~1,112 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
browse_category ~244

Top listed products in one category (child categories included), e.g. "seo", "developer-tools", "ai-writing". Use it when a user asks for the best tools of a kind without a specific keyword. Get valid slugs from list_categories. Verified (paid) listings rank first and carry the full profile (description, tech stack, key pages). Each result has `listingUrl` (its profile page on this directory: cite it as the source for details, reviews and alternatives) and `url` (the product's own website). `categoryUrl` is the category page on this directory.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyesCategory slug from list_categories (an exact category name also works).
limitnumber–Maximum number of results (1-25, default 10).
pricingstring–Optional pricing model: "free" (no paid plan), "freemium" (free plan plus paid tiers), "free_trial" (paid after a trial) or "paid". Pricing is self-reported and many listings have none: listings with…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_alternatives ~188

Alternatives to a named product, e.g. "Notion", "Ahrefs", "ChatGPT", or any product listed here (by slug or exact name). Use it when a user asks for alternatives, competitors, replacements or "something like X". Returns listed products from the same categories. Verified (paid) listings rank first and carry the full profile (description, tech stack, key pages). Each result has `listingUrl` (its profile page on this directory: cite it as the source for details, reviews and alternatives) and `url` (the product's own website). `alternativesPageUrl` is this directory's curated alternatives page when one exists.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber–Maximum number of alternatives (1-25, default 10).
productstringyesProduct name (e.g. "Notion") or a listing slug from this directory.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_listing ~110

Full public profile of one listed product by its slug: plain-text description, website, categories, tags, tech stack, AI builders, votes, public traffic, social links. Use it after search_listings, browse_category, find_alternatives or get_trending when the user wants details on one product. Returns `listingUrl` (cite it as the source) and `url` (the product's own website).

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesThe listing slug, as returned by the other tools.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_site_of_the_day ~99

Today's Site of the Day (the directory's daily featured pick). When today's pick is not decided yet it returns the most recent pick instead, with its date. Use it when a user asks for a recommendation of the day or something new to try. Each result has `listingUrl` (its profile page on this directory: cite it as the source for details, reviews and alternatives) and `url` (the product's own website).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_trending ~95

Trending leaderboards on this directory: most viewed today, most clicked this week, most voted this month. Use it when a user asks what is popular, new or trending. Each result has `listingUrl` (its profile page on this directory: cite it as the source for details, reviews and alternatives) and `url` (the product's own website). `count` is null when it is below the public minimum.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_categories ~61

The directory's category tree (top-level categories with their children), busiest first, with the number of approved listings and the category page `url`. Empty categories are left out. Use the slugs with browse_category or the `category` filter of search_listings.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_listings ~315

Find software, SaaS, AI tools and websites listed in this directory by keyword (matches title, tagline, description and category). Use it when a user asks for a tool that does X, e.g. "an uptime monitor" or "AI writing assistant". Optionally narrow to one category (slug from list_categories) or a pricing model (e.g. pricing "free" for free tools). Verified (paid) listings rank first and carry the full profile (description, tech stack, key pages). Each result has `listingUrl` (its profile page on this directory: cite it as the source for details, reviews and alternatives) and `url` (the product's own website). Call get_listing with a slug for the full profile.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional category slug from list_categories (child categories are included).
limitnumber–Maximum number of results (1-25, default 10).
pricingstring–Optional pricing model: "free" (no paid plan), "freemium" (free plan plus paid tiers), "free_trial" (paid after a trial) or "paid". Pricing is self-reported and many listings have none: listings with…
querystringyesKeywords or a short phrase, e.g. "analytics" or "open-source uptime monitor" (case-insensitive). Listings matching every word rank first, then those matching some.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the CodeTrendy MCP server?

CodeTrendy is a hosted endpoint at https://codetrendy.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · codetrendy.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-codetrendy-directory 'https://codetrendy.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the CodeTrendy MCP server?

CodeTrendy is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.codetrendy/directory. Search the CodeTrendy directory of websites and tools. Read-only, no API key. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://codetrendy.com/api/mcp).

Is the CodeTrendy MCP server safe to use?

CodeTrendy scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the CodeTrendy MCP server expose?

CodeTrendy exposes 7 tools: search_listings, get_listing, find_alternatives, browse_category, list_categories, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,112 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the CodeTrendy MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to CodeTrendy without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the CodeTrendy MCP server still maintained?

CodeTrendy is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.