Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

BravoDM

REMOTE · BRAVODM.COM

Price creator brand deals, look up a brand's public creator program, read niche rate benchmarks.

Available components

+3 this week 74 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 62% of remote servers

Unreachable for 1 day in a row. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Marketing and SEO

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security14
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (3)

  • HTTPS
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport

Checks we could not complete (8)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • TLS certificate in Endpoint SecurityTLS not yet verified: we couldn't open a connection to check the certificate.
  • Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it.
  • HSTS header in Endpoint SecurityHSTS not yet verified: we couldn't read the response headers to check for it.
  • Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.
  • Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
  • Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.
  • Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.
  • Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.20 → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 29 Oct 26 71

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://bravodm.com/api/mcp

TLS unreached
DNSSEC secure

Validation of bravodm.com. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
bravodm.com. DS published 2371 13 Verified
bravodm.com. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://bravodm.com/api/mcp Unreachable
http (plaintext) http://bravodm.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~1,238 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
lookup_brand_program ~98

Look up one brand's public creator program: how creators apply or pitch, the program summary, what the brand sells, and the link to its BravoDM program page. Covers only the brands with public program pages at bravodm.com/brands, from the same catalog records those pages render. Pass a brand name or its BravoDM slug.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandstringyesBrand name (for example Caraway) or slug (caraway).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

price_deal ~916

Price a creator brand deal with BravoDM's published pricing model, the same model the free calculator at bravodm.com/tools/pricing-calculator runs. Two deal kinds: a posted deal (the creator posts on their own account; pass the follower band, niche, deliverable quantities, and the usage and exclusivity terms), and a content-only UGC deal (pass mode "ugc" and a ugc_tier; the creator films and the brand posts, so the price follows the creator's experience tier and never a follower count, and only the ugcVideo quantity prices). Returns the line-by-line price and the three numbers BravoDM publishes for a package: the floor, your number, and the strong ask, in USD.

NameTypeReqDescription
carouselinteger–Quantity of carousel deliverables.
engagementstring–Engagement level key: lower (Lower than most), average (About average), above (Above average), way-above (Way above average). Defaults to average.
exclusivitystring–Exclusivity term key: none (No exclusivity), 30d (30 days), 90d (90 days). Defaults to none.
feedPostinteger–Quantity of feedPost deliverables.
follower_bandstring–Follower band key from the pricing model: under-5k (Under 5k), 5k-10k (5k to 10k), 10k-25k (10k to 25k), 25k-50k (25k to 50k), 50k-100k (50k to 100k), 100k-250k (100k to 250k), 250k-500k (250k to 500…
liveinteger–Quantity of live deliverables.
modestring–Deal kind. "posted" (the default) prices a deal the creator posts, off the follower band. "ugc" prices a content-only deal the brand posts, off the ugc_tier experience tier. Passing ugc_tier without…
nichestringyesPricing model niche key: beauty (Beauty and skincare), fashion (Fashion), fitness (Health and fitness), food (Food and drink), travel (Travel), parenting (Parenting and family), finance (Finance and…
package_discountboolean–True to apply the model's 10 percent package discount on the content subtotal.
platformstringyesPlatform the deal runs on: instagram, tiktok, or youtube.
shortVideointeger–Quantity of shortVideo deliverables.
storyFrameinteger–Quantity of storyFrame deliverables.
storySetinteger–Quantity of storySet deliverables.
typical_viewsinteger–Typical views per video. Only used for YouTube pricing, where it can raise the dedicated video rate above the band base.
ugcVideointeger–Quantity of ugcVideo deliverables.
ugc_tierstring–UGC experience tier key (pricing model v1.1): first-deals (First deals: New to paid UGC work, building a portfolio), steady (Steady brand work: Regular paid UGC work for brands), proven (Proven perfo…
usagestring–Usage rights term key: none (No usage rights), 30d (30 days), 90d (90 days), 180d (180 days), 12mo (12 months), forever (Forever). Defaults to none.
whitelistingboolean–True when the brand may run the content from its own handle (whitelisting, also called Spark or partnership ads). Raises the usage line.
ytDedicatedinteger–Quantity of ytDedicated deliverables.
ytIntegrationinteger–Quantity of ytIntegration deliverables.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

rate_benchmarks ~224

Read the published rate table for one niche: for a creator at 25,000 followers, the floor, your number, and strong ask for one Reel, one feed post, and one Story set, plus what 90 days of usage adds on one Reel. The UGC video is priced differently: the brand posts it, so its rate follows the creator's experience tier, not followers. Its row carries the steady brand work tier and the response includes all three tiers, the figures the UGC rates guide leads with. Figures come from the same tables published at bravodm.com/rates. Pass a niche or category key such as beauty, kitchen, fitness, or tech_gadgets.

NameTypeReqDescription
nichestringyesNiche or category key: a published table key (fashion, food, kitchen, cleaning, home, diy, tech_gadgets, apps_software, beauty, fitness, pets, family, wellness, travel, general_products) or a pricing…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the BravoDM MCP server?

BravoDM is a hosted endpoint at https://bravodm.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · bravodm.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-bravodm-bravodm 'https://bravodm.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the BravoDM MCP server?

BravoDM is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.bravodm/bravodm. Price creator brand deals, look up a brand's public creator program, read niche rate benchmarks. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://bravodm.com/api/mcp).

Is the BravoDM MCP server safe to use?

BravoDM scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the BravoDM MCP server expose?

BravoDM exposes 3 tools: price_deal, lookup_brand_program, rate_benchmarks. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,238 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the BravoDM MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for BravoDM. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the BravoDM MCP server still maintained?

BravoDM is still listed in the MCP registry, though our most recent checks did not reach this channel. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the BravoDM MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 3 checks on BravoDM, covering HTTPS, DNSSEC and Transport. 8 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about BravoDM: TLS certificate, Authorization, HSTS header, Schema quality and 4 more. 5 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.