Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

BookResorts — hotel & resort booking

REMOTE · WWW.BOOKRESORTS.COM

Live hotel and resort prices (taxes included) and secure booking links for travelers. Since 1993.

+4 this week 68 Trust /100

Last scanned (7 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 533 tokens (~177/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management40
  • Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage85
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 55% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 7 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 6 Oct 26 62

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://www.bookresorts.com/api/br/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=www.bookresorts.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 27 Aug 2026 25 Nov 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 61672edf6013ef44495651f3e0050969a64
SANs: www.bookresorts.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.bookresorts.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
bookresorts.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
content-security-policy frame-ancestors 'none'
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.bookresorts.com/api/br/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.bookresorts.com/api/br/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://www.bookresorts.com/api/br/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~452 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_booking_link ~138

Create a secure checkout link for one room option from get_hotel. Give the link to the traveller: it opens our checkout with that exact room, dates and price, where they enter their details and pay (rate re-confirmed live). Links last 24 hours. Never ask the traveller for card details yourself.

NameTypeReqDescription
adultsinteger––
checkinstringyesYYYY-MM-DD
checkoutstringyesYYYY-MM-DD
children_agesarray––
hotel_idstringyes–
option_idstringyesoption_id from get_hotel
roomsinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_hotel ~106

A hotel's live rooms and rates for the dates: room names, size, occupancy, board (room only / breakfast / all-inclusive), refundability and the total price per option. Pass an option_id to create_booking_link.

NameTypeReqDescription
adultsinteger––
checkinstringyesYYYY-MM-DD
checkoutstringyesYYYY-MM-DD
children_agesarray––
hotel_idstringyes–
roomsinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_hotels ~208

Search hotels and resorts in a destination (city, region or resort area) with LIVE prices for the dates and party. Prices are totals for the whole stay in USD, taxes and fees included. Returns up to 15 hotels (cheapest first, or best-rated with sort=rating), with ids for get_hotel.

NameTypeReqDescription
adultsinteger––
all_inclusive_onlyboolean––
checkinstringyesYYYY-MM-DD
checkoutstringyesYYYY-MM-DD
children_agesarray–Ages of children, if any
destinationstringyese.g. 'Cancun', 'Punta Cana', 'Maui', 'Riviera Maya'
min_starsinteger–Only hotels with at least this star rating
roomsinteger–Number of rooms; adults/children are split across them
sortstring–price = cheapest first; rating = best guest rating first

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the BookResorts — hotel & resort booking MCP server?

BookResorts — hotel & resort booking is a hosted endpoint at https://www.bookresorts.com/api/br/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.bookresorts.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-bookresorts-hotel-booking 'https://www.bookresorts.com/api/br/mcp'
Common questions

What is the BookResorts — hotel & resort booking MCP server?

BookResorts — hotel & resort booking is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.bookresorts/hotel-booking. Live hotel and resort prices (taxes included) and secure booking links for travelers. Since 1993. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.bookresorts.com/api/br/mcp).

Is the BookResorts — hotel & resort booking MCP server safe to use?

BookResorts — hotel & resort booking scores 68 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the BookResorts — hotel & resort booking MCP server expose?

BookResorts — hotel & resort booking exposes 3 tools: search_hotels, get_hotel, create_booking_link. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 452 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the BookResorts — hotel & resort booking MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to BookResorts — hotel & resort booking without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the BookResorts — hotel & resort booking MCP server still maintained?

BookResorts — hotel & resort booking is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.