Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Content Provenance

REMOTE · BONISSYSTEMS.COM

Anchor a content-creation event to the Knox chain; returns a C2PA-aligned, FRE 902-shaped bundle.

Available components

+4 this week 72 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability59
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 447 tokens (~223/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://bonissystems.com/api/knox/agents/content-provenance/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=bonissystems.com CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 18 Oct 2026 16 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6d0f95770f49dd11e184ecfd671219da122
SANs: *.bonissystems.com, bonissystems.com
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of bonissystems.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
bonissystems.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.gstatic.com https://images.dmca.com https://static.cloudflareinsights.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://res.cloudinary.com https://utfs.io https://uploadthing.com https://lh3.googleusercontent.com https://storage.googleapis.com https://blockstream.info https://images.dmca.com https://*.tile.openstreetmap.org; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' blob: https://api.anthropic.com https://bonissystems.com https://cloudflareinsights.com https://*.cloudinary.com https://*.polyhaven.org https://www.gstatic.com https://storage.googleapis.com https://blockstream.info https://*.livekit.cloud wss://*.livekit.cloud wss: ws:; media-src 'self' blob: https://res.cloudinary.com https://storage.googleapis.com; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), payment=(), usb=(), magnetometer=(), gyroscope=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://bonissystems.com/api/knox/agents/content-provenance/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://bonissystems.com/api/knox/agents/content-provenance/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://bonissystems.com/api/knox/agents/content-provenance/mcp
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~371 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
anchor_creation ~276

Anchor any creation event to the Knox event chain and return a provenance bundle. Three creation modes are supported: human_original (camera capture, original writing, recording), ai_generated (model + prompt + parameters anchored), and ai_assisted_hybrid (human-AI collaboration with edit chain). Returns the Knox anchor record, a C2PA-aligned envelope, and an FRE 902(13)/(14)-shape affidavit. Bonis Systems anchors what creators present; it does not adjudicate authorship, does not grant copyright, and does not enforce any IP claim. Requires a Knox Bearer API key on the Authorization header — unauthenticated calls are rejected.

NameTypeReqDescription
aiobject–AI-generation metadata (required when source = ai_generated).
contentHashstringyesSHA-256 digest of the content as 64 lowercase hex chars. The content itself is not transmitted.
contentTypestring–MIME type (max 128 chars).
humanobject–Human-original metadata (optional when source = human_original).
hybridobject–Hybrid-creation metadata (required when source = ai_assisted_hybrid).
namestringyesDisplay name for the work (max 256 chars).
sizeBytesinteger–Content size in bytes.
sourcestringyesCreation source.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_provenance ~95

Verify an anchored content-provenance record. Given a SHA-256 anchor hash (the payload_hash from a prior anchor_creation call), return the anchor record, predecessor hash, sequence number, and timestamp. Public — no authentication required. The verification path itself is also accessible at GET /api/knox/verify?hash=<hash>.

NameTypeReqDescription
hashstringyesSHA-256 anchor hash (64 lowercase hex chars).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Content Provenance MCP server?

Content Provenance is a hosted endpoint at https://bonissystems.com/api/knox/agents/content-provenance/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · bonissystems.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-bonissystems-content-provenance 'https://bonissystems.com/api/knox/agents/content-provenance/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Content Provenance MCP server?

Content Provenance is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.bonissystems/content-provenance. Anchor a content-creation event to the Knox chain; returns a C2PA-aligned, FRE 902-shaped bundle. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://bonissystems.com/api/knox/agents/content-provenance/mcp).

Is the Content Provenance MCP server safe to use?

Content Provenance scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Content Provenance MCP server expose?

Content Provenance exposes 2 tools: anchor_creation, verify_provenance. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 371 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Content Provenance MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Content Provenance without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Content Provenance MCP server still maintained?

Content Provenance is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.