Boardroom Bob
REMOTE · MCP.BOARDROOMBOB.COM
AI strategy consultant for founders: 19 frameworks like SWOT, Five Forces and Pre-Mortem.
Available components
Last scanned (21 hours ago)
Scores higher than 56% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Project Management
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 19 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 817 tokens (~43/item across 19 items; 19 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
- Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 19 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 19 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.boardroombob.com
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.boardroombob.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 16 Oct 2026 | 14 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 61ba93c8c9b15582ae0cf54bb11ac3e44b6 |
| SANs: mcp.boardroombob.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.boardroombob.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| boardroombob.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.boardroombob.com | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.boardroombob.com | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://mcp.boardroombob.com/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
run_bcg_matrix ~43
Plot a portfolio on the BCG Growth-Share Matrix.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_competitive_landscape ~42
Build a competitive intelligence report. [Pro]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_first_principles ~43
Strip a problem to fundamental truths and rebuild a solution.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_five_forces ~43
Run Porter's Five Forces on an industry or market.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_five_whys ~40
Drill past symptoms to the root cause.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_full_synthesis ~42
Synthesize everything into final strategic recommendations. [Pro]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_hypothesis_driven ~46
Set up a hypothesis-driven analysis for a decision. [Pro]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_inversion ~42
Map every way this could fail, then avoid those paths.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_mece_issue_tree ~46
Break down a messy business problem into a clean MECE issue tree.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_operating_model ~44
Design an operating model to turn strategy into execution. [Pro]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_opportunity_cost ~42
Make the invisible trade-offs of a yes fully visible.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_pre_mortem ~45
Imagine the project failed in six months and find what killed it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_pyramid_principle ~43
Structure raw data into a top-down pyramid narrative.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_regret_minimization ~45
Decide from your 80-year-old self's vantage point.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_scenario_planning ~44
Run a scenario planning session for multiple futures. [Pro]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_second_order_thinking ~41
Map consequences of a decision three layers deep.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_so_what ~45
Stress-test recommendations with the "So What?" framework. [Pro]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_swot ~37
Build a rigorous, actionable SWOT.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
run_value_chain ~44
Map the full value chain and find where value leaks. [Pro]
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | Your problem, decision, project, or question to analyze with this framework. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Boardroom Bob MCP server?
Boardroom Bob is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.boardroombob.com/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.boardroombob.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-boardroombob-boardroombob 'https://mcp.boardroombob.com/'
What is the Boardroom Bob MCP server?
Boardroom Bob is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.boardroombob/boardroombob. AI strategy consultant for founders: 19 frameworks like SWOT, Five Forces and Pre-Mortem. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.boardroombob.com).
Is the Boardroom Bob MCP server safe to use?
Boardroom Bob scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Boardroom Bob MCP server expose?
Boardroom Bob exposes 19 tools: run_mece_issue_tree, run_five_forces, run_pyramid_principle, run_bcg_matrix, run_hypothesis_driven, and 14 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 817 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Boardroom Bob MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Boardroom Bob without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Boardroom Bob MCP server still maintained?
Boardroom Bob is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.