Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench

REMOTE · BIKE4MIND.COM

Read-only facts on Bike4Mind: live model catalog, comparisons, open-core license, blog, updates.

Available components

+3 this week 80 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 81% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1024 tokens (~113/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
  • Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage89
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 67% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://bike4mind.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=bike4mind.com CN=Amazon RSA 2048 M01,O=Amazon,C=US 5 Oct 2026 20 Apr 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA aca072d873943faa508cf719ef7c164
SANs: bike4mind.com, www.bike4mind.com, docs.bike4mind.com
CN=Amazon RSA 2048 M01,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) CN=Amazon Root CA 1,O=Amazon,C=US 23 Aug 2022 23 Aug 2030 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 77312380b9d6688a33b1ed9bf9ccda68e0e0f
CN=Amazon Root CA 1,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) CN=Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2,O=Starfield Technologies\, Inc.,L=Scottsdale,ST=Arizona,C=US 25 May 2015 31 Dec 2037 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 67f944a2a27cdf3fac2ae2b01f908eeb9c4c6

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of bike4mind.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
bike4mind.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000
content-security-policy frame-ancestors 'self' https://*.bike4mind.com; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://bike4mind.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://bike4mind.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://bike4mind.com/api/mcp
MCP tools · 9 exposed · ~894 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_blog_post ~30

Fetch a bike4mind.com blog post's full content by slug.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_comparison ~64

The full Bike4Mind vs ChatGPT (OpenAI) vs Claude (Anthropic) vs Microsoft Copilot vs build-it-yourself comparison — the same table rendered at /compare, with the structural argument: a lab can't be model-neutral, a cloud can't be cloud-neutral.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_open_core_facts ~56

The open-core licensing and sovereignty facts: the BSL 1.1 → Apache-2.0 ratchet, the three-ring 'door out' (Usage Policy §0), and why the exit is the trust.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_product ~96

One product in the Bike4Mind ecosystem by slug: what it is, where Bike4Mind fits in it, status, category, links, and its latest dated updates.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesproduct slug, one of: bike4mind, bedrock-news, k2kanji, stocks-and-vibes, bob, 4xciv, paintbox, overwatch, tarot, manifold, fleet, one-more-road

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_site_info ~77

What Bike4Mind is, in machine-readable form: the open-core AI workbench (notebooks, agents, 13 artifact types, image gen, data lakes, MCP host+server), licensing (BSL 1.1 → Apache-2.0 ratchet), deployment modes, and every agent-facing surface this site publishes.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_models ~121

The live Bike4Mind model catalog — synced from the live Bike4Mind models API (the same models the app offers). Filter by type ('text'|'image'), provider, or a substring query. Returns name, provider, context window, max output, cost tier (text models), and a per-entry source for auditing.

NameTypeReqDescription
providerstring–e.g. Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, Amazon Bedrock, Black Forest Labs
qstring–substring match on model name
typestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_products ~132

Every product in the Bike4Mind ecosystem (Bike4Mind itself, Bedrock News, K2Kanji, Stocks and Vibes, Bob, 4XCiv, Paintbox, Overwatch, Tarot, Manifold, Fleet) plus Friends of Bike4Mind, products other people built with it (tier 'friend', with a creator): name, one-line tagline, status (live, beta or in development), category, public URL where there is one, and the bike4mind.com page for each. Filter by category or status.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring––
statusstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_blog_posts ~131

Search bike4mind.com blog posts. Multi-word queries are matched term by term across title, tags, summary and full body — so natural phrasing works ("open core licensing") and you do not have to guess a post's exact wording. Results are ranked: posts matching every term come first, partial matches follow rather than being discarded. Omit q to list the most recent posts. Returns compact listings with URLs.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber–max results (default 10)
qstring–words to search for, in any order; matched across title, tags, summary and body

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

whats_new ~187

Dated product updates from Bike4Mind and its products (Paintbox, Tarot, Stocks and Vibes, Bedrock News, K2 Kanji, Manifold, Fleet, Overwatch, Bob), newest first. Each entry is one sentence with a kind (feature, art or fix), a product tag, and any screenshots or demo videos as absolute media URLs. Filter by product slug and/or a start date; omit both for the latest updates.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber–max entries (default 10, max 50)
productstring–product slug, one of: bike4mind, paintbox, tarot, stocks-and-vibes, bedrock-news, k2kanji, manifold, fleet, overwatch, bob, 4xciv, one-more-road
sincestring–only entries on or after this day, YYYY-MM-DD

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench MCP server?

Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench is a hosted endpoint at https://bike4mind.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · bike4mind.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-bike4mind-bike4mind 'https://bike4mind.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench MCP server?

Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.bike4mind/bike4mind. Read-only facts on Bike4Mind: live model catalog, comparisons, open-core license, blog, updates. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://bike4mind.com/api/mcp).

Is the Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench MCP server safe to use?

Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench MCP server expose?

Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench exposes 9 tools: get_site_info, list_models, get_comparison, get_open_core_facts, search_blog_posts, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 894 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench MCP server still maintained?

Bike4Mind — the open-core AI workbench is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.