Anweshna Risk Screening
REMOTE · ANWESHNA.COM
Screen M&A deal documents for red flags across 15 risk categories; findings checked against source.
Available components
Last scanned (4 hours ago)
Scores higher than 54% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 4 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 605 tokens (~151/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
- Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://anweshna.com/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=anweshna.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 30 Oct 2026 | 28 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | b247a425f9faabcd0eff7e4bf5953b35 |
| SANs: anweshna.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of anweshna.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| anweshna.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.paddle.com https://*.googletagmanager.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.googleadservices.com https://*.g.doubleclick.net https://www.clarity.ms https://scripts.clarity.ms; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: https:; connect-src 'self' https: https://*.paddle.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://*.googletagmanager.com https://*.googleadservices.com https://*.g.doubleclick.net https://*.doubleclick.net https://*.google.com https://*.clarity.ms; frame-src 'self' https://*.paddle.com https://*.googletagmanager.com; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://anweshna.com/mcp/ | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://anweshna.com/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://anweshna.com/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
bulk_screen ~268
Upload up to 25 documents and screen them as one batch. Waits for text extraction, then starts scoring and returns job ids; poll get_bulk_status until the batch is finished. Each item is {title, content_base64 | text, filename?}. The 25-document limit is not the binding one for large files: the whole call must stay under 32 MB including base64 overhead, so send fewer, larger documents per batch rather than filling all 25 slots. Exceeding it is a bare HTTP 413 from the transport, before this tool runs. To RESUME a batch that was uploaded but not scored — this tool timed out waiting for extraction, or scoring failed to start — call it again with 'bulk_job_id' instead of 'documents'. That re-uses the existing upload and does NOT spend the account's quota a second time. If the batch is rejected because one or more documents are too large for the plan's scan engine, retry with force_precision=true to scan those documents truncated to the recall window (coverage beyond it is excluded).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bulk_job_id | – | – | – |
| deal_room_id | – | – | – |
| document_type | string | – | – |
| documents | – | – | – |
| engine | – | – | – |
| force_precision | boolean | – | – |
| industry | – | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_analysis ~33
Retrieve the stored risk analysis for a document already screened by this account. Read-only.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| document_id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_bulk_status ~47
Check progress of a batch started by bulk_screen. Pass the upload_job_id, the analyze_job_id, or both.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| analyze_job_id | – | – | – |
| upload_job_id | – | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
screen_document ~192
Upload a deal document and score it for risk across 15 categories. Returns the overall score, rating, whether the deal is flagged as blocked, and per-category findings. Provide the file either as 'content_base64' (PDF, DOCX, TXT or CSV) or as plain 'text'. The whole call must stay under 32 MB, and base64 adds about a third, so the document itself should be under roughly 24 MB — a larger one is rejected by the transport before this tool runs, which surfaces as a bare HTTP 413 rather than a normal tool error. Use the REST upload endpoint for anything bigger.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| content_base64 | – | – | – |
| deal_room_id | – | – | – |
| document_type | string | – | – |
| engine | – | – | – |
| filename | – | – | – |
| force_precision | boolean | – | – |
| industry | – | – | – |
| text | – | – | – |
| title | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Anweshna Risk Screening MCP server?
Anweshna Risk Screening is a hosted endpoint at https://anweshna.com/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · anweshna.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-anweshna-risk-screening 'https://anweshna.com/mcp/'
What is the Anweshna Risk Screening MCP server?
Anweshna Risk Screening is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.anweshna/risk-screening. Screen M&A deal documents for red flags across 15 risk categories; findings checked against source. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://anweshna.com/mcp/).
Is the Anweshna Risk Screening MCP server safe to use?
Anweshna Risk Screening scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Anweshna Risk Screening MCP server expose?
Anweshna Risk Screening exposes 4 tools: screen_document, get_analysis, bulk_screen, get_bulk_status. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 540 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Anweshna Risk Screening MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Anweshna Risk Screening without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Anweshna Risk Screening MCP server still maintained?
Anweshna Risk Screening is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.