Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Anto Joel — Portfolio

REMOTE · WWW.ANTOJOEL.COM

Ask about Anto Joel: profile, case studies, skill evidence, role-fit checks, and booking a call.

Available components

+3 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 535 tokens (~76/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
  • Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.antojoel.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=www.antojoel.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 13 Oct 2026 11 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5f75c5535cca4fe1c37bc4c2385e932541f
SANs: www.antojoel.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.antojoel.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
antojoel.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.antojoel.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.antojoel.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://www.antojoel.com/mcp
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~484 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
book_call ~70

Returns Anto's booking link and a suggested agenda. Use when the user wants to talk to him, schedule an interview, or discuss a project.

NameTypeReqDescription
purposestring–Why they want to talk, e.g. 'Senior PM role at Acme' or 'advisory on document automation'

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

evaluate_role_fit ~59

Call when the user shares a job description or asks whether Anto fits a role. Returns his complete record and a rubric for an honest, evidence-based fit assessment, including gaps.

NameTypeReqDescription
job_descriptionstringyesThe job description or role summary

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_journey ~36

Work history (resume), newest first: role, company, dates and quantified highlights, plus the career story across India and the UAE.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_profile ~40

Overview for recruiters, hiring managers and founders: current role, location, what he's open to, how he works, headline stats and contact links. Start here.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_skills_with_evidence ~43

Every skill mapped to where it shipped and a proof point. Use to check requirements from a job description. A skill missing from this list has no evidence.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_case_studies ~86

Case studies (production voice AI at Machani Robotics plus six shipped ventures), side projects and build notes, framed as product work: problem, decision, trade-offs, outcome, metrics. Fields that are absent are not documented; do not invent them.

NameTypeReqDescription
topicstring–Optional keyword to filter by, e.g. 'banking', 'real-time', 'pricing'

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

priority_intro ~150

Send Anto a priority message that lands in his inbox flagged PRIORITY, with a reply within 48 hours. Costs $0.01 USDC on Base, paid via x402. You are only charged if the message is delivered. Only call when the user explicitly asks to reach out and has approved the payment; use the user's real email so Anto can reply. For a free option, use book_call.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystring–Company or project, e.g. 'Acme — Senior PM role'
emailstringyesSender's email, used as reply-to
messagestringyesThe message for Anto
namestringyesSender's name

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Anto Joel — Portfolio MCP server?

Anto Joel — Portfolio is a hosted endpoint at https://www.antojoel.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.antojoel.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-antojoel-portfolio 'https://www.antojoel.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Anto Joel — Portfolio MCP server?

Anto Joel — Portfolio is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.antojoel/portfolio. Ask about Anto Joel: profile, case studies, skill evidence, role-fit checks, and booking a call. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.antojoel.com/mcp).

Is the Anto Joel — Portfolio MCP server safe to use?

Anto Joel — Portfolio scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Anto Joel — Portfolio MCP server expose?

Anto Joel — Portfolio exposes 7 tools: get_profile, get_journey, list_case_studies, get_skills_with_evidence, evaluate_role_fit, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 484 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Anto Joel — Portfolio MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Anto Joel — Portfolio without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Anto Joel — Portfolio MCP server still maintained?

Anto Joel — Portfolio is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.