Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Anteproof

REMOTE · API.ANTEPROOF.COM

Commit-pace and release probabilities for open-source repositories. Docs: anteproof.com/docs

0 this week 87 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 94% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security94
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability56
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1464 tokens (~244/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
  • 29 Oct 26 0
    • This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.anteproof.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=anteproof.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 31 Oct 2026 29 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 a341df7c998bc16313ef760b5037ff25
SANs: anteproof.com, *.anteproof.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of api.anteproof.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
anteproof.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer error="invalid_token", error_description="Authentication required", resource_metadata="https://api.anteproof.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp", scope="openid email"

Bearer error="invalid_token", error_description="Authentication required", resource_metadata="https://api.anteproof.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp", scope="openid email"
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Protected resource metadata

Document https://api.anteproof.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://api.anteproof.com/mcp
Authorisation server https://clerk.anteproof.com

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.anteproof.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://api.anteproof.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://api.anteproof.com/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,333 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
dependency_risk ~402

Dated maintenance forecast for an open-source package or GitHub repository. Pass an npm, PyPI or crates.io package name, a GitHub owner/repo or URL, or a prefixed name (npm:express, pypi:requests, crate:serde, repo:owner/name). Returns the latest open forecasts that the repository keeps its commit pace (commits_90d) and ships a release (release_90d) in the next 90 days — each with its question id, probability, issue time and resolution date; 90 days of commit, release and star activity summarised (commits last 30 vs prior 30 days, days since last commit and last release, releases in the last year); a velocity block that now carries only the day the entity was last scored — both the `composite` score and the `stage` label are withheld, arriving as null with a `withheld` sibling naming them, and they are not figures we failed to compute, so do not describe a project's momentum on our behalf; plain-language signals derived from those numbers (e.g. 'no commits in 60 days', 'release cadence slowing'); and a calibration note with the family's resolved-forecast count and Brier score, or 'no track record yet'. A package is linked to its repository when the archive knows the link; repo_link says how (self, source_repo = the registry's recorded repository, external_ids, name_match = a labelled guess, unknown). Nothing is estimated on the fly: every number comes from the archive and the answer names what is missing. Not found = no tracked match; try the exact package name or owner/repo. status says whether we cover the package and, when no forecast exists, why. triage is a score from a fixed formula, and its label describes the score. Neither is advice. Probabilities are estimates and are not advice.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_calibration ~687

The calibration record: Brier skill by question family for the pastcast pool and the live track, with the launch-gate verdict for the horizon asked for. horizon: 7, 30, 90, long, or all (default: the horizon the latest verdict scopes on); the 90-day maintenance families (commits_90d, release_90d) are at 90. regime.gate is the verdict evaluated on THAT horizon, or null when no gate has been run on it — never another horizon's verdict, so null means those families are unjudged, not that they failed. regime.latest_gate is the newest verdict overall whatever its horizon, carrying its own domain and horizon_days; read applies_to_this_view before treating it as a verdict on the families returned. SHAPE: `pastcast` and `live` each carry the track's own statistics plus `families`, a list of per-family blocks (family, label, n, brier, brier_skill_score, base_rate, mean_p, z_bias, hit_rate, bins, enough_to_judge). Every one of those blocks, and each track, also carries a `withheld` sibling: null when the numbers are real, otherwise an object {reason, metrics, degraded_from, detail}. WHEN `withheld` IS NON-NULL, EVERY NUMBER IN THAT BLOCK IS JSON null — n included. null there means 'we refuse to publish this', NOT zero and NOT 'nothing resolved'; do not coerce it to 0, do not average over it, and do not report it as a score. A real n=0 with `withheld: null` is the honest 'nothing has resolved yet'. EACH TRACK also carries `partial_withheld`: null normally, otherwise an object with the same {reason, metrics, degraded_from, detail} keys plus `excluded_families` (the families left out of this pooled figure, each with its own reason) and a computed `note`. It means the track's numbers ARE REAL and ARE SOUND, and were pooled over only the families that are individually publishable — partial coverage, not a withheld number. Report the numbers; quote `note` or `detail` alongside them so the scope travels with the figure. `withheld` and `partial_withheld` are never both non-null on t…

NameTypeReqDescription
horizon–––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_entity ~138

One entity's public record: identity, the day it was last velocity-scored, 30-day metric history, and every live question about it with its latest forecast. Every FIGURE in the velocity block — `composite`, `layer_scores` and the `stage` label — is withheld (null, with a `withheld` sibling saying why), so do not report a velocity number and do not describe the project as emerging or fading on our behalf. A velocity block that is present with null figures means we scored the entity and withheld the result; a velocity of null means we never scored it.

NameTypeReqDescription
entity_idintegeryes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_question ~32

One question with every live forecast ever issued for it and its resolution if settled.

NameTypeReqDescription
question_idintegeryes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_forecasts ~38

The public forecast log: newest live forecasts across all entities, with titles.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
offsetinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_entities ~36

Find tracked entities (repositories, packages, companies) by name substring.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
qstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Anteproof MCP server?

Anteproof is a hosted endpoint at https://api.anteproof.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.anteproof.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-anteproof-anteproof 'https://api.anteproof.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Anteproof MCP server?

Anteproof is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.anteproof/anteproof. Commit-pace and release probabilities for open-source repositories. Docs: anteproof.com/docs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.anteproof.com/mcp).

Is the Anteproof MCP server safe to use?

Anteproof scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Anteproof MCP server expose?

Anteproof exposes 6 tools: search_entities, get_entity, get_question, list_forecasts, get_calibration, dependency_risk. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,333 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Anteproof MCP server require authentication?

Yes. Anteproof asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the Anteproof MCP server still maintained?

Anteproof is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.