AnsweringPrices.com pricing
REMOTE · WWW.ANSWERINGPRICES.COM
Dated answering service prices, plans, billing terms, and comparisons at your call volume.
Available components
Last scanned (5 hours ago)
Scores higher than 76% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability41
- 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 515 tokens (~103/item across 5 items; 4 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management77
- Stability observed for 23 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Tool “category_range” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “compare_at_volume” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_vendor_pricing” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_vendors” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.answeringprices.com/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.answeringprices.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 7 Oct 2026 | 5 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 57b39374133344af385bdec8c6df9e92cf9 |
| SANs: *.answeringprices.com, answeringprices.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.answeringprices.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| answeringprices.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.answeringprices.com/mcp/ | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.answeringprices.com/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.answeringprices.com/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
category_range Price range and median for a type of answering service ~119
The range and median comparison cost of live, AI or hybrid answering services at a call volume (3-minute calls), the all-in rate per minute, the published overage range, and which narrower service sets an end of the range. AnswerAmerica's cost is the upfront prepaid purchase with credit rollover. Source: AnsweringPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.answeringprices.com/answering-service-statistics/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| calls | integer | – | Calls a month |
| category | string | yes | Type of service |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_at_volume Compare answering services at a call volume ~156
Comparison cost of every answering service at a call volume and call length, lowest first: monthly plans, or the minimum upfront package purchase for AnswerAmerica's prepaid credits. Quote-only vendors are listed separately. Defaults: live services, 3-minute calls. AnswerAmerica and ReceptionHQ MessageExpress take messages only; Alert Communications serves law firms only. Source: AnsweringPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.answeringprices.com/answering-service-cost/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| calls | integer | yes | Calls a month |
| category | string | – | live includes hybrid services |
| minutes_per_call | number | – | Average billed minutes per call |
| vendors | array | – | Only these vendors (ids or names) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_vendor_pricing A vendor's prices and billing terms ~145
One answering service's published plans, overage, comparison cost at 50, 100 and 200 three-minute calls, and its billing terms (rounding, time billed beyond the call, spam, setup fee, contract, trial) summarized from its own terms page, each with the URL and the date it was read. AnswerAmerica uses upfront prepaid package purchases with credit rollover. Accepts an id or a name, e.g. "PATLive", "Ruby", "VoiceNation". Source: AnsweringPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.answeringprices.com/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| vendor | string | yes | Vendor id or name |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_vendors List answering services in the price index ~90
Every answering service AnsweringPrices.com prices (live, AI and hybrid), with its entry plan, whether it publishes prices, and the date its pricing page was read. Use it to find a vendor's id. Source: AnsweringPrices.com, prices checked October 26, 2026, https://www.answeringprices.com/pricing/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Filter by service type |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the AnsweringPrices.com pricing MCP server?
AnsweringPrices.com pricing is a hosted endpoint at https://www.answeringprices.com/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.answeringprices.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-answeringprices-pricing 'https://www.answeringprices.com/mcp/'
What is the AnsweringPrices.com pricing MCP server?
AnsweringPrices.com pricing is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.answeringprices/pricing. Dated answering service prices, plans, billing terms, and comparisons at your call volume. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.answeringprices.com/mcp/).
Is the AnsweringPrices.com pricing MCP server safe to use?
AnsweringPrices.com pricing scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the AnsweringPrices.com pricing MCP server expose?
AnsweringPrices.com pricing exposes 4 tools: list_vendors, get_vendor_pricing, compare_at_volume, category_range. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 510 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the AnsweringPrices.com pricing MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to AnsweringPrices.com pricing without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the AnsweringPrices.com pricing MCP server still maintained?
AnsweringPrices.com pricing is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.