Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac

REMOTE · AINETCAFE.COM

Chinese almanac: lunar calendar, BaZi 八字, daily 宜忌, lucky-day picker, public holidays.

Available components

0 this week 86 Trust /100

Last scanned (10 hours ago)

Scores higher than 92% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 7 Nov 2026.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability82
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 565 tokens (~94/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 6 Nov 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 4 Nov 26 +63
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.97 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
  • 3 Nov 26 −63
    • Endpoint reachability: unreachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • HSTS header: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • Transport: Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but the endpoint returned HTTP 530. security
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
  • 29 Oct 26 +63
    • Stability: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 13 Oct 26 −63
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 7 Nov 2026 · Probed https://ainetcafe.com/mcp/almanac?s=registry

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=ainetcafe.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 26 Sept 2026 25 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 5d17da71fa17d5231307fc9550536f42
SANs: ainetcafe.com, *.ainetcafe.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of ainetcafe.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
ainetcafe.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://ainetcafe.com/mcp/almanac?s=registry Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://ainetcafe.com/mcp/almanac?s=registry HTTPS enforced 301 https://ainetcafe.com/mcp/almanac?s=registry
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~461 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
bazi_chart ~57

八字排盘 from birth date and hour: four pillars (年月日时柱), five-element counts, 纳音, zodiac. Uses true solar-term boundaries.

NameTypeReqDescription
datetimestringyesBirth datetime YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

cn_holiday ~45

Is a date a Chinese public holiday, weekend, or 调休 make-up workday? Plus the next holiday.

NameTypeReqDescription
datestring–YYYY-MM-DD, default today

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

huangli ~58

Chinese almanac for a date: 宜 (auspicious activities), 忌 (avoid), 冲煞, 彭祖百忌. date omitted = today.

NameTypeReqDescription
datestring–YYYY-MM-DD, default today

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

lunar_calendar ~53

Chinese lunar calendar for any date: 农历、干支纪年、生肖、节气、节日、星座。date omitted = today.

NameTypeReqDescription
datestring–YYYY-MM-DD, default today

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

pick_lucky_days ~89

Find auspicious days in a month for an event: 结婚/领证/搬家/开业/装修/出行/签约/订婚/安床/安葬 or any 黄历宜 term.

NameTypeReqDescription
eventstringyesEvent keyword in Chinese, e.g. 搬家
monthstring–YYYY-MM, default current month

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

what_can_you_do ~159

Describe a task in plain language (any language) and get back exactly which tools on this server do it, with ready-to-run example calls — instead of reading the whole catalogue and guessing. Also returns multi-step recipes when a task needs several tools chained (invoices to a ledger, a bank statement reconciled, a messy CSV turned into a deliverable). Deterministic and free: it calls no model, costs nothing, and never runs out of quota. Call this FIRST when you are not sure what this server offers.

NameTypeReqDescription
taskstringyesWhat you are trying to do, e.g. "reconcile a bank statement against my books" or "把一堆发票整理成能入账的表格"

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac MCP server?

com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac is a hosted endpoint at https://ainetcafe.com/mcp/almanac?s=registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · ainetcafe.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-ainetcafe-netcafe-almanac 'https://ainetcafe.com/mcp/almanac?s=registry'
Common questions

What is the com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac MCP server?

com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac. Chinese almanac: lunar calendar, BaZi 八字, daily 宜忌, lucky-day picker, public holidays. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://ainetcafe.com/mcp/almanac?s=registry).

Is the com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac MCP server safe to use?

com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac MCP server expose?

com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac exposes 6 tools: what_can_you_do, lunar_calendar, bazi_chart, huangli, pick_lucky_days, cn_holiday. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 461 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac MCP server still maintained?

com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 7 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on com.ainetcafe/netcafe-almanac, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.