InvoiceForge
REMOTE · INVOICEFORGE.AGENTTOOLWORKS.COM
Generate, validate and read EN 16931 and Peppol BIS 3.0 e-invoices, in UBL and CII.
Available components
Last scanned (5 hours ago)
Scores higher than 91% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security71
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation is enforced on tool calls, but the challenge carries no valid RFC 9728 metadata, so a client cannot discover where to get a token. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 396 tokens (~79/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 31 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=agenttoolworks.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 13 Oct 2026 | 11 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 11b17b1acfade00a13d35376ddad132a |
| SANs: agenttoolworks.com, invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com, *.invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| agenttoolworks.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Challenged, unverified
The endpoint asked for a token, but we could not retrieve and validate the RFC 9728 metadata that tells a client how to obtain one.
| Result | Challenged, unverified |
|---|---|
| Enforced | On tool calls |
| HTTP status | 200 |
Protected resource metadata
| Retrieved | No |
|---|---|
| Problem | no_resource_metadata |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
describe_coverage List what this server checks and what it does not do ~65
Returns the exact EN 16931 rules this server checks, the syntaxes it can produce and read, and the things it deliberately does not do, such as transmitting invoices over Peppol or acting as a French accredited platform. Light read: costs 0.2 credit.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
extract_invoice Read an invoice document into structured data ~79
Reads an incoming UBL or CII (Factur-X) invoice XML and returns the data as structured JSON, listing any field the document did not contain rather than guessing it. Use it to ingest supplier invoices before booking them. Costs 1 credit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| xml | string | yes | The invoice XML, UBL 2.1 or CII |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_invoice Generate a compliant e-invoice ~113
Turns invoice data into a compliant UBL 2.1 XML document following the EN 16931 semantic model, with totals and the VAT breakdown computed for you. Choose the plain EN 16931 profile or the Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 customization. The document is validated before it is returned, so you never get back XML that would be rejected. Costs 1 credit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice | object | yes | The invoice to produce |
| profile | string | – | Which specification identifier to stamp on the document |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_usage Get usage and credit balance ~30
Returns your current plan, remaining credit balance and call volume over the last 30 days. Free to call.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_invoice Check an invoice against EN 16931 rules ~109
Checks invoice data against a documented subset of the EN 16931 business rules: mandatory fields, code lists, VAT category consistency and the arithmetic that most often gets invoices rejected. Accepts incomplete or malformed data on purpose, since that is what you want checked, and answers with each violation, its rule identifier and its business term, plus exactly which rules were checked. It never claims full compliance with the norm. Costs 1 credit.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| invoice | object | yes | The invoice to check, however incomplete |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the InvoiceForge MCP server?
InvoiceForge is a hosted endpoint at https://invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-agenttoolworks-invoiceforge 'https://invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp'
What is the InvoiceForge MCP server?
InvoiceForge is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.agenttoolworks/invoiceforge. Generate, validate and read EN 16931 and Peppol BIS 3.0 e-invoices, in UBL and CII. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp).
Is the InvoiceForge MCP server safe to use?
InvoiceForge scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the InvoiceForge MCP server expose?
InvoiceForge exposes 5 tools: generate_invoice, validate_invoice, extract_invoice, describe_coverage, get_usage. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 396 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the InvoiceForge MCP server require authentication?
Yes. InvoiceForge asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.
Is the InvoiceForge MCP server still maintained?
InvoiceForge is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.