Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy
REMOTE · WWW.ADSPENDSPY.COM
Keyless demo: Meta Ad Library ads of one advertiser with estimated ad spend and top landing pages.
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 68% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1093 tokens (~156/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
- Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage84
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 52% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
- Tool “get_ad_details” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_brand_ads” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_tracked_brands” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “list_brand_ads” added an optional parameter “sort” cosmetic
- “get_ad_details” reworded the description of “ad_id” cosmetic
- 23 Oct 26 +17
- HSTS header: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28). functional
- MCP protocol version: 2025-11-25 → 2026-07-28 functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.adspendspy.com/mcp-demo
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=adspendspy.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 19 Oct 2026 | 17 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | fc25527575ac05d9133f92cb7205a86f |
| SANs: adspendspy.com, *.adspendspy.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.adspendspy.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| adspendspy.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.adspendspy.com/mcp-demo | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.adspendspy.com/mcp-demo | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://www.adspendspy.com/mcp-demo |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_brands_tracked Check advertiser tracking ~66
Public demo: Alex Hormozi only (page_id 116482854782233). Ad listings/details expose only approved public creatives; statistics describe this advertiser only. Check whether each string Meta page ID is actively tracked by your account.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_ids | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_ad_details Inspect an ad creative ~117
Public demo: Alex Hormozi only (page_id 116482854782233). Ad listings/details expose only approved public creatives; statistics describe this advertiser only. Retrieve one ad of an advertiser you actively track by its internal AdSpendSpy ad ID (internal_ad_id), not its Meta ad ID. Saved lists and favorites do not retain MCP ad access after you remove a tracked brand on the website.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ad_id | integer | yes | Internal AdSpendSpy ad ID (internal_ad_id in ad listings); never a Meta ad ID. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_top_ads_stats Analyze estimated ad spend ~187
Public demo: Alex Hormozi only (page_id 116482854782233). Ad listings/details expose only approved public creatives; statistics describe this advertiser only. Analyze latest cumulative estimated spend in EUR for your tracked advertisers. page_id is an exact advertiser filter. timeframe filters when ads were last seen, NOT spend accrued during that period. Creative breakdowns sample the top 1,000 ads; response metadata states matched and sampled counts and full-match aggregate spend. Zero can mean unavailable estimates.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| active_only | – | – | – |
| category | string | – | – |
| media_type | string | – | – |
| page_id | string | – | Meta advertiser page ID, kept as a string. |
| project | string | – | Only all is available in the public demo. |
| q | string | – | – |
| timeframe | string | – | Last-seen window; never a period-spend calculation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_top_landingpages_stats Rank landing pages by estimated spend ~218
Public demo: Alex Hormozi only (page_id 116482854782233). Ad listings/details expose only approved public creatives; statistics describe this advertiser only. Rank the landing pages of your tracked advertisers by latest cumulative estimated spend in EUR. Ads are grouped by landing URL with ad, advertiser and active-ad counts, the top-spending advertiser and, when one is stored, a screenshot as screenshot_url (site path) and screenshot_full_url (absolute URL). page_id is an exact advertiser filter; q matches part of the landing URL. timeframe filters when ads were last seen, NOT spend accrued during that period. Zero can mean unavailable estimates.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| active_only | – | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| page_id | string | – | Meta advertiser page ID, kept as a string. |
| project | string | – | Only all is available in the public demo. |
| q | string | – | Substring of the landing URL. |
| timeframe | string | – | Last-seen window; never a period-spend calculation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_brand_ads List advertiser ads ~186
Public demo: Alex Hormozi only (page_id 116482854782233). Ad listings/details expose only approved public creatives; statistics describe this advertiser only. List creative summaries for one tracked advertiser, newest internal ID first, or with sort spend highest latest cumulative estimated spend first (use it for an advertiser's top ads). pagination.next_cursor returns the next page. Each ad carries internal_ad_id (AdSpendSpy ID) and meta_ad_id (the ad on Meta).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| active_only | boolean | – | – |
| cursor | string | – | Opaque pagination.next_cursor returned by the previous page with the same filters. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| media_type | string | – | – |
| page_id | string | yes | Meta advertiser page ID, kept as a string. |
| sort | string | – | newest = newest internal ID first; spend = highest estimated spend first. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_tracked_brands List tracked advertisers ~71
Public demo: Alex Hormozi only (page_id 116482854782233). Ad listings/details expose only approved public creatives; statistics describe this advertiser only. List your actively tracked advertisers and their string page_id values.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | string | – | Only all is available in the public demo. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_tracked_brands Find a tracked advertiser ~82
Public demo: Alex Hormozi only (page_id 116482854782233). Ad listings/details expose only approved public creatives; statistics describe this advertiser only. Search your tracked advertisers by name, Meta page ID, or stored Facebook URL. Searches existing local data only; does not resolve vanity URLs through paid providers.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy server?
Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy is a hosted endpoint at https://www.adspendspy.com/mcp-demo, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.adspendspy.com
claude mcp add --transport http com-adspendspy-adspendspy-demo 'https://www.adspendspy.com/mcp-demo'
What is the Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy server?
Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy is listed in the public MCP registry as com.adspendspy/adspendspy-demo. Keyless demo: Meta Ad Library ads of one advertiser with estimated ad spend and top landing pages. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.adspendspy.com/mcp-demo).
Is the Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy server safe to use?
Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy server expose?
Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy exposes 7 tools: list_tracked_brands, search_tracked_brands, check_brands_tracked, list_brand_ads, get_ad_details, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 927 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy server require authentication?
No. We connected to Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy server still maintained?
Meta Ad Library Spend MCP Demo by AdSpendSpy is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.