Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Accent site content

REMOTE · WWW.ACCENTVOICE.COM

Search Accent's public website and get non-binding budgetary estimates from published plan prices.

+3 this week 84 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 626 tokens (~156/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
  • Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage96
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 89% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “site_search” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.accentvoice.com/agent/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=www.accentvoice.com CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 9 Sept 2026 8 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 64c014abab290e38a68745ee2db6733cd94
SANs: accentvoice.com, www.accentvoice.com
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.accentvoice.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
accentvoice.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options SAMEORIGIN
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.accentvoice.com/agent/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.accentvoice.com/agent/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://www.accentvoice.com/agent/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~552 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_budgetary_quote ~289

Non-binding monthly estimate for Accent cloud phone and team messaging plans at the published 36-month rates on https://www.accentvoice.com/plans-pricing/ (users × per-user plan price, plus published add-ons). Month-to-month, other terms and annual-billing online-order pricing are not quoted here: request a formal quote. Omit plan to get every plan; monthly.low_from / high_from name the plan behind each end of the range (each plan carries its tagline, e.g. Team is team messaging). Excludes taxes, fees, usage and one-time charges. Each estimate lists the plan's included features as published on the Plans & Pricing page. No personal data needed. For a binding price, send the person to next_steps.formal_quote_url.

NameTypeReqDescription
addonsobject––
planstring–team = Team (Team Messaging); pro = Pro (Cloud Phone, Team Messaging); pro-plus = Pro+ (Phone, Message + Bring Your Own VoIP Phone); premium = Premium (Phone, Message with a VoIP Phone Included)
termstring–36_month (default) = the published plan-card price. month_to_month is not quoted by this tool: it returns term_not_supported with a formal-quote link.
usersintegeryesNumber of users. Above the service limit the tool answers formal_quote_required.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

site_get ~103

Fetch one published record in full. Pass exactly one of `route` (e.g. "/cloud-phone-system/") or `slug` (looked up as product, then post, then page, then story). Returns a not_found error if nothing is published there.

NameTypeReqDescription
routestring–Site route with a trailing slash, e.g. /cloud-phone-system/.
slugstring–Record slug, e.g. gxp1625-ip-phone.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

site_search ~121

Search the published content of www.accentvoice.com (pages, blog posts, products, customer stories). Plain questions work: filler words are ignored, results are ranked by how many terms match (title first), and broad questions return the overview pages. Returns up to `limit` results with collection, slug (absent for pages), route, title and score. Use site_get to read a result in full.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Maximum results.
qstringyesSearch terms.
typestring–Restrict to one collection.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

site_status ~39

The schema version and release stamp (git, build time, digest) of the content being served. It equals the stamp in /agent/content-index.json.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Accent site content MCP server?

Accent site content is a hosted endpoint at https://www.accentvoice.com/agent/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.accentvoice.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-accentvoice-site 'https://www.accentvoice.com/agent/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Accent site content MCP server?

Accent site content is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as com.accentvoice/site. Search Accent's public website and get non-binding budgetary estimates from published plan prices. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.accentvoice.com/agent/mcp).

Is the Accent site content MCP server safe to use?

Accent site content scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Accent site content MCP server expose?

Accent site content exposes 4 tools: site_search, site_get, site_status, get_budgetary_quote. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 552 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Accent site content MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Accent site content without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Accent site content MCP server still maintained?

Accent site content is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.