Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana

NPM · MCP-NANO-BANANA

MCP server for Google Nano Banana (Gemini) image generation

Available components

0 this week 76 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 53% of npm servers

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security81
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects sharp 0.34.5, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 41 of 138 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability57
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 507 tokens (~253/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 3 Nov 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 28 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 26 Oct 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
  • 22 Oct 26 0
    • CVE-2026-114113 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • CVE-2026-114111 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • CVE-2026-114112 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • GHSA-wq5f-xc86-pv6w no longer affects this package ▲ security
    • GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c no longer affects this package ▲ security
    • GHSA-f88m-g3jw-g9cj no longer affects this package ▲ security
  • 20 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/mcp-nano-banana@1.2.2

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 3 findings
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-f88m-g3jw-g9cj CVE-2026-114113 high yes
GHSA-rgj7-g3m4-5g8c CVE-2026-114112 high yes
GHSA-wq5f-xc86-pv6w CVE-2026-114111 high yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 138 packages
Packages resolved 138
Stale 41
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~507 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
generate_favicons ~242

Generate a full favicon package from a prompt or an existing image. Creates PNG sizes, a web manifest, and optional README, then writes files and/or a ZIP bundle.

NameTypeReqDescription
appNamestring–Manifest app name. Default: My App.
backgroundColorstring–Manifest background color. Default: #ffffff.
imagePathstring–Path to an existing master icon image. If provided, prompt is optional.
includeReadmeboolean–Include README.md in the package.
modelstring–Model to use when generating the master icon from a prompt.
outputDirstring–Directory to write individual favicon files.
outputPathstring–File path to save the favicon ZIP package.
promptstring–Text description for generating a master icon (square). Required if imagePath is not provided.
returnZipBase64boolean–When true and outputPath is not provided, return the ZIP as base64 text.
shortNamestring–Manifest short name. Default: App.
themeColorstring–Manifest theme color. Default: #ffffff.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

generate_image ~265

Generate an image using Google Nano Banana (Gemini) AI model. Can generate from text only, or use one or more reference images (up to 14) to guide generation.

NameTypeReqDescription
aspectRatiostring–Aspect ratio of the generated image. Additional ratios (1:4, 4:1, 1:8, 8:1) available on gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview.
imagePathsarray–Optional array of file paths to reference images (up to 14). Supports png, jpg, jpeg, webp, gif.
modelstring–Model to use: gemini-2.5-flash-image (fast) or gemini-3-pro-image-preview (high quality, default)
outputFormatstring–Output image format
outputPathstring–File path to save the generated image. If not provided, image data is returned inline.
promptstringyesText description of the image to generate or instructions for editing/combining reference images
resolutionstring–Resolution of the generated image. 512 only on gemini-3.1-flash-image-preview. Nano Banana Pro supports 1K, 2K, 4K.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana server?

io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y mcp-nano-banana. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · mcp-nano-banana

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add codefi-mcp-nano-banana -- npx -y mcp-nano-banana
Common questions

What is the io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana server?

io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana. MCP server for Google Nano Banana (Gemini) image generation. This page covers its npm package (mcp-nano-banana).

Is the io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana server safe to use?

io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 3 known advisories against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana server expose?

io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana exposes 2 tools: generate_image, generate_favicons. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 507 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana server still maintained?

io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana server under?

io.github.codeFi/mcp-nano-banana declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.