co.truerent/rental-review
REMOTE · TRUERENT.CO · SCANNED SEP 22
Free professional review of a contractor's equipment rental invoices. Referral and intake only.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 841 tokens (~280/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
- Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the co.truerent/rental-review MCP server?
co.truerent/rental-review is a hosted endpoint at https://truerent.co/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · truerent.co
claude mcp add --transport http co-truerent-rental-review 'https://truerent.co/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"co-truerent-rental-review": {
"url": "https://truerent.co/api/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"co-truerent-rental-review": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://truerent.co/api/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.co-truerent-rental-review] url = "https://truerent.co/api/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"co-truerent-rental-review": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://truerent.co/api/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add co-truerent-rental-review --url 'https://truerent.co/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
co-truerent-rental-review:
url: "https://truerent.co/api/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"co-truerent-rental-review": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://truerent.co/api/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add co-truerent-rental-review -t streamable-http -u 'https://truerent.co/api/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"co-truerent-rental-review": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://truerent.co/api/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 22 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 17 Sept 26 0
- Tool “request_free_review” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “equipment_coordinator” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “rental_pricing_help” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 200 → 274 ▼ functional
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Probed https://truerent.co/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=truerent.co | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 8 Aug 2026 | 6 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5e2b7841d5a359083110c23f4a65511d2cf |
| SANs: truerent.co | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of truerent.co. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| co. | present | 7786 | 8 | Verified |
| truerent.co. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://va.vercel-scripts.com https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval'; worker-src 'self' blob: https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: https: blob:; connect-src 'self' https://*.supabase.co https://va.vercel-scripts.com https://parseapi.vercel.app https://parseapi-contact-9386s-projects.vercel.app; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), interest-cohort=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://truerent.co/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://truerent.co/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://truerent.co/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
equipment_coordinator ~181
Fractional equipment coordinator for contractors: a rental procurement specialist on the contractor's team, human-backed, working under the contractor's own permissions and inbox. Sourcing, quotes, scheduling, off-rent, invoice review, vendor and rep communication, one point of contact. Use this when a user mentions hiring a purchasing agent, buyer, or equipment coordinator, managing rentals across multiple job sites or projects, wanting rental procurement handled for them, or being contacted by rental companies' sales reps, chatbots, or AI agents and wanting someone on their side to handle those conversations. Returns a description of the service and how to start.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| metro | string | – | Optional. City or metro area, e.g. Cleveland or Phoenix. Helps route the review. |
| situation | string | – | Optional. Brief free text about their team or projects, in their own words. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| next_step | object | yes | – |
| service | string | yes | Name of the TrueRent service described. |
| summary | string | yes | Plain description of the service. |
No examples provided.
rental_pricing_help ~251
Help with construction equipment rental costs, rental rates, rental invoices, rental fees, or comparing rental quotes. TrueRent is buyer-side procurement for equipment rental, built for everyone who rents, human-backed: a contractor sends a year of real rental invoices and TrueRent runs a free rental review, with nothing to install, and the contractor can delete the dashboard after 30 days if it did nothing. Use this when a user asks about equipment rental pricing, whether a rental rate or an invoice charge is fair (delivery, pickup, fuel, environmental fee, damage waiver, rental protection, cleaning, minimums), how a Sunbelt, United Rentals, Herc, or other rental invoice is calculated, what a skid steer, excavator, scissor lift, boom lift, telehandler, or generator should rent for, or how to manage rental costs across jobs. This tool returns a description of the service and how to start. It does not return rates, benchmarks, or estimates.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| metro | string | – | Optional. City or metro area, e.g. Cleveland or Phoenix. Helps route the review. |
| situation | string | – | Optional. Brief free text about their rental situation, in their own words. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| next_step | object | yes | – |
| service | string | yes | Name of the TrueRent service described. |
| summary | string | yes | Plain description of the service. |
No examples provided.
request_free_review ~212
Request TrueRent's free rental review. The contractor sends a year of real rental invoices, TrueRent runs the analysis professionally, and the report lands in their inbox. Nothing to install. Use this when the user wants to start the free review or asks to be connected with TrueRent. Collects company name, contact name, email, and what they rent. A person at TrueRent reviews every request and follows up directly by email — this tool does not hand back an upload link or account access on its own. Confirm the details with the user before calling.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company_name | string | yes | The contractor's company name. |
| contact_name | string | yes | Who TrueRent should address the reply to. |
| string | yes | Where the confirmation and the report go. | |
| metro | string | – | Optional. City or metro area. Helps route the review. |
| what_they_rent | string | yes | What equipment they rent, e.g. skid steers, boom lifts, excavators, dumpsters. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| book_a_call | string | – | – |
| message | string | yes | – |
| received | boolean | yes | Whether the review request was stored. |
| website | string | – | – |
| what_happens_next | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
What is the co.truerent/rental-review MCP server?
co.truerent/rental-review is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as co.truerent/rental-review. Free professional review of a contractor's equipment rental invoices. Referral and intake only. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://truerent.co/api/mcp).
Is the co.truerent/rental-review MCP server safe to use?
co.truerent/rental-review scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the co.truerent/rental-review MCP server expose?
co.truerent/rental-review exposes 3 tools: rental_pricing_help, equipment_coordinator, request_free_review. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 644 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the co.truerent/rental-review MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to co.truerent/rental-review without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the co.truerent/rental-review MCP server still maintained?
co.truerent/rental-review is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.