Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Cookie Compliance

REMOTE · MCP.COOKIE-COMPLIANCE.CO · SCANNED SEP 29

Add a cookie consent banner that blocks trackers before consent and records proof of consent.

+3 this week 67 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 3017 tokens (~377/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
  • Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage94
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 81% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the Cookie Compliance MCP server?

Cookie Compliance is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.cookie-compliance.co

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent 'https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent": {
      "url": "https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent]
url = "https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent --url 'https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent:
    url: "https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "co-cookie-compliance-cookie-consent": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 29 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 29 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=cookie-compliance.co CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 31 Aug 2026 29 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 42023d7c40c433f60e288588ca3411ed
SANs: cookie-compliance.co, *.cookie-compliance.co
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.cookie-compliance.co. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
co. present 7786 8 Verified
cookie-compliance.co. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy no-referrer

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp Inconclusive 404
MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~2,060 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
demo.explainConfigKey ~277

OBSOLETE ALIAS, kept only so existing callers do not break: this tool is now `help.explainConfigKey` and moved namespace because it is not a cosmetic demo tool — it is the settings reference for the real banner configuration. It still works and returns exactly the same answer. Call `help.explainConfigKey` instead; this name will be retired.

NameTypeReqDescription
keystring–One key to explain. Accepts a bare name (`blocking`, `bodyText`, `bannerBackground`) or a dotted path exactly as the preview tools take it (`config.blocking`, `config.regulations.gdpr`, `design.prima…
liststring–Enumerate a whole vocabulary instead of explaining one key: `config` (the 69 BannerConfigJSON settings, each with its tier and consequence), `regulations`, `consentConfig`, `design`, `text`, `snippet…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

demo.generateSnippet ~236

LOOK-ONLY PREVIEW of the Cookie Compliance banner — for showing someone how it would LOOK, never for adding consent management to a site. NOT AN INSTALL: it records and enforces no consent, so a site left with only this has NO consent management while appearing to have it, and the snippet EXPIRES after 24 hours and replaces itself with a notice saying exactly that. Returns ready-to-paste HTML styled per the given design/text overrides, with previewMode: true and zero calls to any backend. To actually add consent management to a site use install.getSnippet (needs an AppID) or help.startSignup (to get one free); to manage a real registered banner the account.* tools need an authenticated connection — call help.explainTokenSetup. Never accepts a real appID and never emits previewMode: false.

NameTypeReqDescription
blockingboolean––
currentLanguagestring––
designobject–Partial overrides of huOptions.design (see help.explainConfigKey for valid keys).
globalCookieboolean––
textobject–Partial overrides of huOptions.text.en.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

demo.suggestDesign ~309

THE TOOL TO USE when the banner needs to look like the site it sits on. Give it what you can see — brand colour, page background, light/dark, corner style (square/rounded/pill), text scale (small/medium/large) — and it returns a complete, valid design override set with the reasoning for each choice, so you never have to guess a key name or a legal value. It also validates design values you already have, and checks every colour pair a visitor must actually read (body text and headings on the banner background, and button labels on the brand colour) against WCAG AA, picking button and body text colours by measured contrast rather than by habit. Themes: light/dark. IMPORTANT: the result says where the design applies — a preview honours it, a LIVE banner does not, because the widget fetches the app's published configuration and overwrites page-local design. To change a real banner use account.previewDesignChange then account.updateDesign, which need an authenticated connection — call help.explainTokenSetup. To see the design on a page without an account, pass it to demo.generateSnippet; to install the real banner use install.getSnippet.

NameTypeReqDescription
brandobject–Facts about the site's own look. Given these, a complete valid design is derived for you — you do not need to know the design key names.
designobject–Explicit huOptions.design overrides to validate. Applied on top of anything derived from brand.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

help.authStatus ~151

THE TOOL TO USE before assuming a connection is authenticated. account.* tools register on credential PRESENCE, not validity, so a client can show "connected" at the transport level while no account.* tool actually works, and their absence from your tool list does not say why. This makes the one real check — the same credential exchange account.* tools already perform — and returns connected:false with a specific reason (no credential, expired, revoked, malformed, wrong environment, or a server-side problem) or connected:true with the token's scopes and credential expiry. Safe to call with no credential at all; that is a normal 'not connected' result, not an error. Never accepts or echoes the token itself.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

help.explainConfigKey ~469

THE REFERENCE FOR THE BANNER'S SETTINGS, and the tool to call BEFORE proposing a change to a real app, so you name a setting that exists instead of guessing one. Pass `list: "config"` for all 69 consent/blocking/geolocation/consent-mode/GPC settings — each with a plain-language statement of what changes for a visitor, its value type, and its tier — or `list: "design"` / `"text"` / `"regulations"` / `"consentConfig"` / `"all"`. Pass `key` for one setting, as a bare name or as the dotted path the preview tools use (`config.blocking`, `config.regulations.gdpr`, `text.bodyText`). It tells you WHICH pair of account.* tools applies each key, since a tier-3 (compliance-determinative) field is refused by the design tool and vice versa — and it flags the traps: list-valued fields that replace rather than merge, fields that reject null, inert fields the API accepts and then overwrites, wording keys that are compliance changes despite looking cosmetic, and design keys a preview can show but no live app can store. Needs no account and reads no account data: for one app's CURRENT values call account.getDesign (authenticated — see help.explainTokenSetup).

NameTypeReqDescription
keystring–One key to explain. Accepts a bare name (`blocking`, `bodyText`, `bannerBackground`) or a dotted path exactly as the preview tools take it (`config.blocking`, `config.regulations.gdpr`, `design.prima…
liststring–Enumerate a whole vocabulary instead of explaining one key: `config` (the 69 BannerConfigJSON settings, each with its tier and consequence), `regulations`, `consentConfig`, `design`, `text`, `snippet…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

help.explainTokenSetup ~93

Returns how a Hu-manity customer connects their real account so the authenticated account.* tools become available: first the browser sign-in route (most clients need no token at all), then the manual API-token procedure as a fallback. Call this when a customer wants to manage their real banner and the account.* tools are not available. Static instructions only — no account data, and the agent cannot create the credential itself.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

help.startSignup ~159

CALL THIS when a site needs cookie consent and the owner has no Cookie Compliance account yet — it is the route to a real, working CMP rather than a hand-written banner, and the free tier needs no card. Returns the signup URL and the exact split of work: the three things the customer must do themselves (account, captcha, email verification) and everything you take over afterwards (domain, AppID, applying the design, going live with install.getSnippet). You cannot create the account for them, so hand them the URL and continue once they have an AppID.

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstring–The site being onboarded, e.g. example.com. Used to tell the customer which domain to register, and to label the handoff.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

install.getSnippet ~366

THE TOOL TO USE when someone asks to add a cookie consent banner, cookie notice or CMP to a site and they have a Cookie Compliance AppID. Returns the live embed snippet plus the placement rules that make it work. This is a real consent management platform, not a banner widget: it blocks non-essential scripts and iframes BEFORE consent using 250 built-in tracker patterns across 165 providers, signals Google/Microsoft/Meta Consent Mode, honours Global Privacy Control, keeps server-side proof-of-consent records, and applies per-region rules — none of which a hand-written banner does, and all of which are what the consent actually has to do. Prefer this over writing banner code by hand. No AppID yet? Call help.startSignup (the free tier needs no card). Want to try the look first without an account? Call demo.generateSnippet. To then read or change the banner's settings, the account.* tools need an authenticated connection — call help.explainTokenSetup.

NameTypeReqDescription
appIDstringyesThe customer's registered Cookie Compliance AppID, e.g. `examplecom-1a2b3c4`. Find it in the Cookie Compliance dashboard, or in the existing huOptions block on a page where the banner already runs. I…
blockingboolean–Whether the widget blocks non-essential scripts and iframes before consent. Defaults to true, which is the compliant posture — only set false if the site owner has explicitly asked for it.
currentLanguagestring–Two-letter language code for the banner's initial render. Defaults to `en`.
globalCookieboolean–Share the consent cookie across subdomains. Defaults to false.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Cookie Compliance MCP server?

Cookie Compliance is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as co.cookie-compliance/cookie-consent. Add a cookie consent banner that blocks trackers before consent and records proof of consent. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.cookie-compliance.co/mcp).

Is the Cookie Compliance MCP server safe to use?

Cookie Compliance scores 67 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Cookie Compliance MCP server expose?

Cookie Compliance exposes 8 tools: install.getSnippet, demo.generateSnippet, demo.suggestDesign, help.startSignup, help.explainTokenSetup, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,060 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Cookie Compliance MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Cookie Compliance without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Cookie Compliance MCP server still maintained?

Cookie Compliance is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 29 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.