Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port

OCI · GHCR.IO/CLOUDCORPRECORDS/VIDEOHUB-PORT · 2 COMPONENTS

YouTube videos, channels, playlists, comments and transcripts as MCP tools.

42 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 53% of OCI servers

Category Entertainment and Games

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security0
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
  • Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
  • Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 587 tokens (~48/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
  • Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (12)

  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (4)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  • Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
  • Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
  • Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 40

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/videohub-port@0.1.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem oci
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~587 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_channel ~33

Retrieve a single YouTube channel by ID.

NameTypeReqDescription
channel_idstringyesID of the YouTube channel to retrieve.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_playlist ~33

Retrieve a single YouTube playlist by ID.

NameTypeReqDescription
playlist_idstringyesID of the YouTube playlist to retrieve.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_trending_videos ~59

List trending YouTube videos for a region.

NameTypeReqDescription
max_resultsnumber–Maximum number of trending videos to return.
region_codestring–Region code (ISO country code) whose trending videos are listed; defaults to US.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_video ~33

Retrieve a single YouTube video by ID.

NameTypeReqDescription
video_idstringyesID of the YouTube video to retrieve.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_video_categories ~42

List YouTube video categories for a region.

NameTypeReqDescription
region_codestring–Region code (ISO country code) whose video categories are listed; defaults to US.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_video_transcript ~58

Get the transcript of a YouTube video.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Language code of the caption track to retrieve; defaults to English (en).
video_idstringyesID of the YouTube video whose transcript is retrieved.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_channel_videos ~53

List videos from a YouTube channel, newest first.

NameTypeReqDescription
channel_idstringyesID of the YouTube channel whose videos are listed.
max_resultsnumber–Maximum number of videos to return.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_playlist_items ~50

List items in a YouTube playlist.

NameTypeReqDescription
max_resultsnumber–Maximum number of playlist items to return.
playlist_idstringyesID of the YouTube playlist whose items are listed.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_playlists ~49

List playlists for a YouTube channel.

NameTypeReqDescription
channel_idstringyesID of the YouTube channel whose playlists are listed.
max_resultsnumber–Maximum number of playlists to return.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_video_comments ~49

List comments on a YouTube video.

NameTypeReqDescription
max_resultsnumber–Maximum number of comments to return.
video_idstringyesID of the YouTube video whose comments are listed.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_channels ~48

Search YouTube channels matching a query.

NameTypeReqDescription
max_resultsnumber–Maximum number of channels to return.
querystringyesSearch query text matched against YouTube channel names and metadata.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_videos ~80

Search YouTube videos matching a query.

NameTypeReqDescription
max_resultsnumber–Maximum number of videos to return.
orderstring–Sort order for the search results, passed to the YouTube search API (for example relevance, date, or viewCount).
querystringyesSearch query text matched against YouTube video titles and metadata.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/videohub-port:0.1.0 mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

oci · ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/videohub-port

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-videohub-port -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/videohub-port:0.1.0 mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port. YouTube videos, channels, playlists, comments and transcripts as MCP tools. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/videohub-port).

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port MCP server safe to use?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port scores 42 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port MCP server expose?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port exposes 12 tools: search_videos, get_video, list_video_comments, get_channel, search_channels, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 587 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port MCP server still maintained?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port MCP server under?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 8 more. 4 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.CloudCorpRecords/videohub-port: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts and Dependency health. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a container image, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.