Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port

OCI · GHCR.IO/CLOUDCORPRECORDS/TASKBOARD-PORT · 2 COMPONENTS

Asana workspaces, projects and tasks via the REST API, as MCP tools.

40 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 41% of OCI servers

Category Project Management

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security0
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
  • Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
  • Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 664 tokens (~60/item across 11 items; 11 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
  • Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "delete_task" implies "delete" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
  • 2 Nov 26 39

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/taskboard-port@0.1.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem oci
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

MCP tools · 11 exposed · ~664 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_project ~64

Create a new Asana project.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesThe name of the new project.
notesstring–Optional notes describing the new project.
workspace_gidstring–Optional unique identifier (gid) of the workspace in which to create the project.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

create_task ~103

Create a new Asana task.

NameTypeReqDescription
assignee_gidstring–Optional unique identifier (gid) of the user to assign the new task to.
due_onstring–Optional due date for the task, in YYYY-MM-DD format.
namestringyesThe name of the new task.
notesstring–Optional notes describing the new task.
projectsarray–Optional array of project gids to add the new task to.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

delete_task ~33

Delete an Asana task.

NameTypeReqDescription
task_gidstringyesThe unique identifier (gid) of the task to delete.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_current_user ~16

Get the current Asana user.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_project ~36

Get an Asana project by its gid.

NameTypeReqDescription
project_gidstringyesThe unique identifier (gid) of the project to retrieve.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_task ~36

Get an Asana task by its gid.

NameTypeReqDescription
task_gidstringyesThe unique identifier (gid) of the task to retrieve.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_projects ~49

List Asana projects, optionally within one workspace.

NameTypeReqDescription
workspace_gidstring–Optional unique identifier (gid) of the workspace to list projects from; when omitted, projects across workspaces are listed.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_tasks ~110

List Asana tasks by project or assignee, optionally filtered by completion.

NameTypeReqDescription
assignee_gidstring–Optional unique identifier (gid) of the user whose assigned tasks to list, used when no project_gid is given.
completedboolean–Optional completion filter applied client-side: true returns only completed tasks, false only incomplete tasks.
project_gidstring–Optional unique identifier (gid) of the project whose tasks to list; takes precedence over assignee_gid when both are given.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_workspaces ~20

List Asana workspaces accessible to the current user.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_tasks ~55

Search Asana tasks by text within a workspace.

NameTypeReqDescription
textstringyesThe text to search tasks for within the workspace.
workspace_gidstringyesThe unique identifier (gid) of the workspace to search tasks in.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

update_task ~142

Update fields of an existing Asana task.

NameTypeReqDescription
assignee_gidstring–Optional unique identifier (gid) of the user to reassign the task to.
completedboolean–Optional completion state to set: true marks the task completed, false marks it incomplete.
due_onstring–Optional new due date for the task, in YYYY-MM-DD format.
namestring–Optional new name for the task; omitted fields are left unchanged.
notesstring–Optional new notes for the task; omitted fields are left unchanged.
task_gidstringyesThe unique identifier (gid) of the task to update.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/taskboard-port:0.1.0. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

oci · ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/taskboard-port

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-taskboard-port -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/taskboard-port:0.1.0
Common questions

What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port. Asana workspaces, projects and tasks via the REST API, as MCP tools. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/taskboard-port).

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port MCP server safe to use?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port scores 40 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port MCP server expose?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port exposes 11 tools: get_current_user, list_workspaces, list_projects, get_project, create_project, and 6 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 664 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port MCP server still maintained?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port MCP server under?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/taskboard-port declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.