io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport
OCI · GHCR.IO/CLOUDCORPRECORDS/PROCUREPORT · 2 COMPONENTS
Korean public procurement: bids, awards, contracts, statistics, products and mall search.
Available components
Last scanned (14 hours ago)
Scores higher than 46% of OCI servers
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 2 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 811 tokens (~54/item across 15 items; 15 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
- Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 15 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 15 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Checks we ran (12)
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (4)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
- Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
- Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
- Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 39
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/procureport@0.1.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
call_api_with_pagination_support ~118
Call any service operation repeatedly with paging and aggregate the items across pages for bulk exploration.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_pages | number | – | Maximum number of pages to fetch, defaults to 5. |
| operation | string | yes | Operation name to call. |
| page_size | number | – | Number of items per page, defaults to 100. |
| params | object | – | Additional parameters to pass to the operation. |
| service | string | yes | API service ID, such as public_data_standard, procurement_statistics, product_list, or shopping_mall. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
call_procurement_statistics_api ~56
Call the procurement statistics API (14 operations) with an operation and parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation | string | yes | Operation name to call on the procurement statistics API. |
| params | object | – | Additional parameters to pass to the operation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
call_product_list_api ~59
Call the product list API (12 operations) for the product catalogue with an operation and parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation | string | yes | Operation name to call on the product list API. |
| params | object | – | Additional parameters to pass to the operation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
call_public_data_standard_api ~62
Call the public data standard API for bid notices, awards, and contracts with an operation and parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation | string | yes | Operation name to call on the public data standard API. |
| params | object | – | Additional parameters to pass to the operation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
call_shopping_mall_api ~57
Call the shopping mall API (9 operations) with an operation and parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation | string | yes | Operation name to call on the shopping mall API. |
| params | object | – | Additional parameters to pass to the operation. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
crawl_list ~62
Query the product list, optionally filtered by a search query, with paging.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | number | – | Page number to return. |
| page_size | number | – | Number of items per page. |
| query | string | – | Search query text to filter the product list. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_all_api_services_info ~30
List all API services and their operations from the built-in catalogue, without calling the upstream API.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_api_operations ~50
List the operations available for one API service from the built-in catalogue.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| service | string | yes | API service ID, such as public_data_standard, procurement_statistics, product_list, or shopping_mall. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_data_exploration_guide ~33
Return a guide to exploring the procurement data: which services and tools to use, in what order.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_detailed_attributes ~33
Fetch the detailed attributes for a single product by its product identifier.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_id | string | yes | Product identifier. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_procurement_statistics_by_year ~44
Get procurement statistics for a single year.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| year | number | yes | Year to get statistics for, as an integer between 1900 and 2100. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_recent_bid_announcements ~70
Get recent bid announcements over an automatically computed recent period, optionally for one business type.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| business_type | string | – | Business type name or code, such as goods, services, construction, or foreign. |
| days | number | – | Number of recent days to include, defaults to 7. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_successful_bids_by_business_type ~62
Get successful bids (awards) for a business type; a Korean business-type name is converted to its code automatically.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| business_type | string | yes | Business type name or code, such as goods, services, construction, or foreign. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_shopping_mall_products ~50
Search shopping mall products by name, optionally narrowed to one company.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | – | Company name to narrow results to. |
| query | string | yes | Product name to search for. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
server_info ~25
Return information about this server and the tools it offers, without calling the upstream API.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport MCP server?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/procureport:0.1.0 mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/procureport
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-procureport -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/procureport:0.1.0 mcp
What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport MCP server?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport. Korean public procurement: bids, awards, contracts, statistics, products and mall search. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/procureport).
Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport MCP server safe to use?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport scores 41 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport MCP server expose?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport exposes 15 tools: crawl_list, get_detailed_attributes, server_info, call_public_data_standard_api, call_procurement_statistics_api, and 10 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 811 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport MCP server still maintained?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport MCP server under?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 8 more. 4 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.CloudCorpRecords/procureport: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts and Dependency health. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a container image, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.