Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind

OCI · GHCR.IO/CLOUDCORPRECORDS/FIRMFIND · 2 COMPONENTS

Company search and enrichment across official business registers, via the CompanyData API.

37 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 37% of OCI servers

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security0
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
  • Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
  • Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Build provenance not yet verified. View diagnostics → Unverified
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 1 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability50
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 689 tokens (~229/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
  • Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (11)

  • Source repository
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (5)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  • Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
  • Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
  • Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.
  • Provenance in Provenance & TransparencyBuild provenance not yet verified.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1
    • Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
  • 3 Nov 26 36

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/firmfind@0.1.0

Provenance Inconclusive

We could not complete the check, so nothing is claimed either way. This is a gap on our side, not a finding about the package.

Result Inconclusive
Ecosystem oci
Reason Attestation not fetched

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~689 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
company_enrich ~34

Export (enrich) one company by its CompanyData ID.

NameTypeReqDescription
IDstringyesThe identifier for this call.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

company_search ~599

Search companies in official business registers by name, location, industry, size and contact filters.

NameTypeReqDescription
IDstring–The identifier for this call.
annualSalesMaxinteger–The annual sales maximum for this call.
annualSalesMininteger–The annual sales minimum for this call.
cityNamestring–The city name for this call.
countryCodestring–The country code for this call.
countryNamestring–The country name for this call.
emailstring–Email address.
employeesHereMaxinteger–The employees here maximum for this call.
employeesHereMininteger–The employees here minimum for this call.
employeesTotalMaxinteger–The employees total maximum for this call.
employeesTotalMininteger–The employees total minimum for this call.
foundingYearsMaxinteger–The founding years maximum for this call.
foundingYearsMininteger–The founding years minimum for this call.
hasCEONameboolean–Filter to records that have a CEO name (optional).
hasEmailboolean–Filter to records that have an email address (optional).
hasMarketabilityboolean–Filter to marketable records (optional).
hasNationalIDboolean–Filter to records that have a national ID (optional).
hasPhoneboolean–Filter to records that have a phone number (optional).
hasWebsiteboolean–Filter to records that have a website (optional).
importExportCodestring–The import export code for this call.
legalStatusstring–The legal status for this call.
nationalIdstring–National ID value (optional).
pageinteger–Page number for paginated results (optional).
pageSizeinteger–The page size for this call.
phoneNumberstring–Phone number (optional).
postalCodestring–The postal code for this call.
postalCodeIntegerMaxinteger–The postal code integer maximum for this call.
postalCodeIntegerMininteger–The postal code integer minimum for this call.
provinceNamestring–The province name for this call.
regionNamestring–The region name for this call.
searchstring–Search text filter (optional).
sic4Digitsstring–The sic4 digits for this call.
statusCodestring–The status code for this call.
streetNamestring–The street name for this call.
strictCountryboolean–Require strict country matching (optional).
subsidiaryCodestring–The subsidiary code for this call.
websitestring–Website URL (optional).
worldwideHeadquarterIDstring–The worldwide headquarter identifier for this call.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

field_lookup ~56

Look up city suggestions for a place-name search.

NameTypeReqDescription
countriesstring–Country codes to include.
limitinteger–Maximum number of results to return (optional).
searchstringyesSearch text filter (optional).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/firmfind:0.1.0 mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

oci · ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/firmfind

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-firmfind -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/firmfind:0.1.0 mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind. Company search and enrichment across official business registers, via the CompanyData API. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/firmfind).

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind MCP server safe to use?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind scores 37 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind MCP server expose?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind exposes 3 tools: company_search, company_enrich, field_lookup. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 689 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind MCP server still maintained?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind MCP server under?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 11 checks on io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind, covering Source repository, License, Maintenance, Security disclosure and 7 more. 5 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.CloudCorpRecords/firmfind: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 1 more. One category scores 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a container image, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.