Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud

OCI · GHCR.IO/CLOUDCORPRECORDS/CRMCLOUD · 2 COMPONENTS

Salesforce org access: SOQL queries, SOSL search, SObject CRUD, limits, and user info.

40 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 43% of OCI servers

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security0
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
  • Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
  • Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 436 tokens (~43/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
  • Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "delete_record" implies "delete" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 38

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/crmcloud@0.1.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem oci
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

MCP tools · 10 exposed · ~436 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_record ~65

Create a record of the given SObject type with the given field values.

NameTypeReqDescription
fieldsobjectyesAn object of field names to field values to set on the new record.
sobjectstringyesThe API name of the SObject type of the record to create.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

delete_record ~56

Delete one record by SObject type and record ID.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesThe Salesforce record ID of the record to delete.
sobjectstringyesThe API name of the SObject type of the record to delete.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

describe_sobject ~42

Describe one SObject: its fields, child relationships, and record types.

NameTypeReqDescription
sobjectstringyesThe API name of the SObject type to describe.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_org_limits ~17

Fetch the org's API usage limits.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_record ~56

Fetch one record by SObject type and record ID.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesThe Salesforce record ID of the record to fetch.
sobjectstringyesThe API name of the SObject type of the record to fetch.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_user_info ~21

Fetch the identity of the user the access token belongs to.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_sobjects ~19

List the SObjects available in the Salesforce org.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

run_soql_query ~42

Run a SOQL query against the Salesforce org and return the matching records.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesThe SOQL query to run against the Salesforce org.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_records ~39

Run a SOSL search across Salesforce objects and return the search records.

NameTypeReqDescription
searchstringyesThe SOSL search string to run across Salesforce objects.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

update_record ~79

Update fields on one record by SObject type and record ID.

NameTypeReqDescription
fieldsobjectyesAn object of field names to new field values to set on the record.
idstringyesThe Salesforce record ID of the record to update.
sobjectstringyesThe API name of the SObject type of the record to update.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/crmcloud:0.1.0. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

oci · ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/crmcloud

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-crmcloud -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/crmcloud:0.1.0
Common questions

What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud MCP server?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud. Salesforce org access: SOQL queries, SOSL search, SObject CRUD, limits, and user info. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/crmcloud).

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud MCP server safe to use?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud scores 40 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud MCP server expose?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud exposes 10 tools: run_soql_query, search_records, list_sobjects, describe_sobject, get_record, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 436 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud MCP server still maintained?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud MCP server under?

io.github.CloudCorpRecords/crmcloud declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.