io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel
OCI · GHCR.IO/CLOUDCORPRECORDS/CLOUDPANEL · 2 COMPONENTS
Azure subscriptions, resource groups, resources and VMs via ARM REST as MCP tools.
Available components
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 42% of OCI servers
Category Cloud Infrastructure
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 559 tokens (~55/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
- Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "delete_resource_group" implies "delete" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 38
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/cloudpanel@0.1.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
create_resource_group ~101
Create or update an Azure resource group.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| location | string | yes | The Azure region (location) for the resource group, e.g. 'eastus'. |
| resource_group | string | yes | The name of the resource group to create or update. |
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription in which to create the resource group. |
| tags | object | – | Optional tags to apply to the resource group, as a key-value object. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
delete_resource_group ~49
Delete an Azure resource group.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| resource_group | string | yes | The name of the resource group to delete. |
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription containing the resource group. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_resource ~109
Get one Azure resource by its full type path.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| resource_group | string | yes | The name of the resource group containing the resource. |
| resource_name | string | yes | The name of the resource to retrieve. |
| resource_provider | string | yes | The Azure resource provider namespace, e.g. 'Microsoft.Compute'. |
| resource_type | string | yes | The resource type within the provider namespace, e.g. 'virtualMachines'. |
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription containing the resource. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_resource_group ~49
Get one Azure resource group.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| resource_group | string | yes | The name of the resource group to retrieve. |
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription containing the resource group. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_subscription ~31
Get one Azure subscription by ID.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription to retrieve. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_locations ~35
List Azure locations available to a subscription.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription whose available locations to list. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_resource_groups ~36
List resource groups in an Azure subscription.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription whose resource groups to list. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_resources ~64
List resources in a subscription or one resource group.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| resource_group | string | – | Optional name of a resource group to scope the listing to; omit to list resources across the whole subscription. |
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription whose resources to list. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_subscriptions ~17
List Azure subscriptions visible to the token.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_virtual_machines ~68
List virtual machines in a subscription or resource group.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| resource_group | string | – | Optional name of a resource group to scope the listing to; omit to list virtual machines across the whole subscription. |
| subscription_id | string | yes | The ID of the Azure subscription whose virtual machines to list. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel MCP server?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/cloudpanel:0.1.0. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/cloudpanel
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-cloudpanel -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/cloudpanel:0.1.0
What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel MCP server?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel. Azure subscriptions, resource groups, resources and VMs via ARM REST as MCP tools. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/cloudpanel).
Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel MCP server safe to use?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel scores 40 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel MCP server expose?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel exposes 10 tools: list_subscriptions, get_subscription, list_resource_groups, get_resource_group, create_resource_group, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 559 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel MCP server still maintained?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel MCP server under?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/cloudpanel declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.