io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge
NPM · @RENETURCIOS/ACTIONBRIDGE · 2 COMPONENTS
Zapier exposed actions as MCP tools via a generic action runner.
Available components
Last scanned (7 hours ago)
Scores higher than 31% of npm servers
Category Workflow Automation
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security81
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 30 of 93 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 346 tokens (~43/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
- Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "execute_action" implies "execute" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 63
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@reneturcios/actionbridge@0.1.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 1 finding
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 | CVE-2023-54404 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 93 packages
| Packages resolved | 93 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 30 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
describe_action_inputs ~42
Describe the input parameters for an exposed Zapier action.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action_id | string | yes | ID of the exposed Zapier action whose declared input parameters should be described. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
execute_action ~85
Execute an exposed Zapier action with instructions and optional params.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action_id | string | yes | ID of the exposed Zapier action to execute. |
| instructions | string | yes | Instructions describing how the action should be performed, passed to the Zapier execution endpoint. |
| params | object | – | Optional parameter values for the action, as a key-value object, sent with the execution request. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_action ~35
Retrieve a single exposed Zapier action by ID.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action_id | string | yes | ID of the exposed Zapier action to retrieve. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_execution_result ~40
Retrieve the result of a Zapier action execution by execution ID.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| execution_id | string | yes | ID of the action execution whose result should be retrieved. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_action_apps ~19
List distinct app names across exposed Zapier actions.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_actions ~19
List exposed Zapier actions available to this API key.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_actions ~41
Search exposed Zapier actions by name, app or description.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Search text matched against the name, app, and description of exposed actions. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_action_params ~65
Validate params against an exposed Zapier action's declared parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action_id | string | yes | ID of the exposed Zapier action to validate the given params against. |
| params | object | yes | Parameter values to check against the action's declared parameters, as a key-value object. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge MCP server?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @reneturcios/actionbridge. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @reneturcios/actionbridge
claude mcp add cloudcorprecords-actionbridge -- npx -y @reneturcios/actionbridge
What is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge MCP server?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge. Zapier exposed actions as MCP tools via a generic action runner. This page covers its npm package (@reneturcios/actionbridge).
Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge MCP server safe to use?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge MCP server expose?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge exposes 8 tools: list_actions, search_actions, get_action, execute_action, list_action_apps, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 346 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge MCP server still maintained?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge MCP server under?
io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionbridge declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.