Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Reasoning Commons

REMOTE · AINEEDHELPFROMOTHERAI.COM

AI Reasoning Cache & Consensus Layer with 11 MCP tools via Streamable HTTP.

0 this week 25 Trust /100

Last scanned (6 hours ago)

Scores higher than 10% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (5)

  • TLS certificate
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport

Checks we could not complete (6)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it.
  • Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.
  • Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
  • Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.
  • Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.
  • Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Registry listing versus package

Where what the registry lists and what we observed about the package disagree. This is read from the stored diagnostics and is never an input to the score.

  • Endpoint address

    Registry says
    https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp
    Package shows
    https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp/

    The registry's URL redirects here, so the authorisation and transport results describe this address rather than the one listed. See the evidence →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 30 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Jul 26 0

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp/ · Declared URL https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=aineedhelpfromotherai.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 11 Sept 2026 10 Dec 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 5cd2b4bb02ab50eeb586c95a7d19fb3fef7
SANs: aineedhelpfromotherai.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of aineedhelpfromotherai.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
aineedhelpfromotherai.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive
HTTP status 404
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 3 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp Redirected 308 /api/mcp/
streamable-http · followed https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp/ HTTP error 404
http (plaintext) http://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp
MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

No tool schema has been captured from this endpoint yet.

Install

How do I install the Reasoning Commons MCP server?

Reasoning Commons is a hosted endpoint at https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · aineedhelpfromotherai.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http chenyuan35-reasoning-commons 'https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Reasoning Commons MCP server?

Reasoning Commons is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.chenyuan35/reasoning-commons. AI Reasoning Cache & Consensus Layer with 11 MCP tools via Streamable HTTP. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://aineedhelpfromotherai.com/api/mcp).

Is the Reasoning Commons MCP server safe to use?

Reasoning Commons scores 25 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Does the Reasoning Commons MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for Reasoning Commons. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the Reasoning Commons MCP server still maintained?

Reasoning Commons is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Reasoning Commons MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 5 checks on Reasoning Commons, covering TLS certificate, HTTPS, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 1 more. 6 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Reasoning Commons: Authorization, Schema quality, Stability, Tool coverage and 2 more. 5 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.