RegEvidenceHub Waste
REMOTE · WASTE.REGEVIDENCEHUB.COM · SCANNED SEP 24
RegEvidenceHub Waste: England waste registration, DWT readiness and permit-change preflight.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 937 tokens (~133/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the RegEvidenceHub Waste MCP server?
RegEvidenceHub Waste is a hosted endpoint at https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · waste.regevidencehub.com
claude mcp add --transport http changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp 'https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp": {
"url": "https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp] url = "https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp --url 'https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp:
url: "https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"changhuliu-uk-waste-rule-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Sept 26 69
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Sept 2026 · Probed https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=waste.regevidencehub.com | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 24 Sept 2026 | 23 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5444435f17a134e64c0c1768bd8a527749f |
| SANs: waste.regevidencehub.com | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of waste.regevidencehub.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| regevidencehub.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
waste_carrier_broker_dealer_preflight ~128
FREE CARRIER/BROKER/DEALER REGISTRATION LIFECYCLE tool for England. Select when the unresolved question is a new registration, renewal, detail/activity change, legal-type change, or lower-to-upper change for a carrier, broker or dealer. Supply role and lifecycle action, plus own-waste/tier facts when relevant. Returns a bounded route, fee route, findings and official evidence. It is read-only and never submits or renews a registration. Do NOT use for site permit changes or DWT reporting readiness.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenario | – | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
waste_digital_tracking_readiness ~124
FREE DIGITAL WASTE TRACKING RECEIVING-SITE READINESS tool for England phase 1. Select only when the question is whether a waste receiving site is in the permitted/licensed receiving-site scope and ready for receipt reporting around the 1 October 2026 mandatory start. Supply receiving authorisation, whether controlled waste is received, reporting-method readiness, and optionally an as-of date. Returns phase-1 scope/readiness, findings and evidence; it never submits DWT records. Do NOT use for carrier registration or permit-change comparison.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenario | – | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
waste_permit_change_preflight ~119
FREE PERMIT-CHANGE IMPACT PREFLIGHT for an EXISTING England waste operation when both current and proposed operating facts are available. Compare modelled fields such as location, activities, waste types, quantity, storage, treatment or operating hours. Returns changed fields, findings, official evidence and review actions; it is read-only and does not vary a permit or decide that a variation/new permit is legally required. Do NOT use for a brand-new operation route, carrier registration, or DWT receipt-reporting readiness.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenario | – | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
waste_rule_catalog ~65
FREE RULE CATALOG tool. Use before a case-specific preflight when an agent needs the exact supported role IDs, activity IDs, and bounded route names accepted by this service. Do NOT use it to decide a user's case; use waste_rule_preflight after collecting the relevant facts.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
waste_rule_preflight ~119
FREE GENERAL ENTRY TOOL for a CURRENT England waste operation when the regulatory route is still uncertain. Provide nation, role, one or more modelled activities, and any known site/waste/authorisation facts. Returns a deterministic route, missing facts, findings, evidence and next actions; it is read-only and does not submit anything. Do NOT use when the question is specifically carrier/broker/dealer registration, DWT receiving-site readiness, or a current-vs-proposed permit change; use the corresponding narrow tool instead.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenario | – | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
waste_service_info ~86
FREE SERVICE/DISCOVERY metadata tool. Use for questions about this connector's England scope, available tools, payment-free public-AI surface, fail-closed behavior, and safety boundaries. Do NOT use for evidence freshness; use waste_source_status. Do NOT use for a case-specific regulatory route; use waste_rule_preflight or the narrower registration, DWT, or permit-change tool.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
waste_source_status ~77
FREE EVIDENCE-HEALTH tool. Use only to check whether the reviewed official GOV.UK / Environment Agency evidence is fresh, unchanged, available and decision-usable. It returns source-health status and never makes a waste-route or permit conclusion. Do NOT use for operational routing; use waste_rule_preflight or a narrower workflow tool.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the RegEvidenceHub Waste MCP server?
RegEvidenceHub Waste is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.ChanghuLiu/uk-waste-rule-mcp. RegEvidenceHub Waste: England waste registration, DWT readiness and permit-change preflight. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://waste.regevidencehub.com/ai/mcp).
Is the RegEvidenceHub Waste MCP server safe to use?
RegEvidenceHub Waste scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the RegEvidenceHub Waste MCP server expose?
RegEvidenceHub Waste exposes 7 tools: waste_service_info, waste_rule_catalog, waste_source_status, waste_rule_preflight, waste_carrier_broker_dealer_preflight, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 718 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the RegEvidenceHub Waste MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to RegEvidenceHub Waste without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the RegEvidenceHub Waste MCP server still maintained?
RegEvidenceHub Waste is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.