Antevo Trademark
REMOTE · TRADEMARK.ANTEVO.CH · SCANNED OCT 3
Is that brand name taken? Screen the registers and check the opposition window. No account.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 642 tokens (~160/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
- Stability check failed: schema churn in the 30 days we've observed: 1 tool removals, 0 breaking changes, 0 auth/transport breaks, 0 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the Antevo Trademark MCP server?
Antevo Trademark is a hosted endpoint at https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · trademark.antevo.ch
claude mcp add --transport http ch-antevo-trademark 'https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"ch-antevo-trademark": {
"url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"ch-antevo-trademark": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.ch-antevo-trademark] url = "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"ch-antevo-trademark": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add ch-antevo-trademark --url 'https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
ch-antevo-trademark:
url: "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"ch-antevo-trademark": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add ch-antevo-trademark -t streamable-http -u 'https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"ch-antevo-trademark": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 16 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 145 → 160 ▼ functional
- 15 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → fail ▼ security
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 1.0.0 ▼ security
- Tool “filing_landscape” was removed ▼ security
- Schema quality: 789 → 583 ▲ functional
- 11 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 3 Oct 2026 · Probed https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=trademark.antevo.ch | CN=GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 10 Aug 2026 | 10 Feb 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 179555e2ddfe8fecc5a284a75b61189 |
| SANs: trademark.antevo.ch | ||||||
| CN=GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) | CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 2 Nov 2017 | 2 Nov 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | d07782a133fc6f9a57296e131ffd179 |
| CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) | CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 1 Aug 2013 | 15 Jan 2038 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 33af1e6a711a9a0bb2864b11d09fae5 |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of trademark.antevo.ch. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ch. | present | 58745 | 13 | Verified |
| antevo.ch. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
holder_read Read a trademark holder ~104
Who a holder is and how they file — the read on an adversary. Free. Computed from their whole register book: how much of it they let lapse, whether their marks cluster where they trade or spray across unrelated classes, and the leverage that gives counsel. Present the evidence, not just the label — and never call anyone a squatter; that is a legal conclusion we do not assert.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
opposition_window Opposition window for an office ~140
How long you have to oppose a filing in a given trademark office, and from when. Twenty registers, each with the provision the window comes from. The trap this answers: most offices run opposition BEFORE registration, from publication of the application, but a minority — Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Sweden — register the mark first and run the window from publication of the REGISTRATION. Applying one office's rule to another invents a deadline that never existed. Accepts a country name, an office name or a two-letter code ('japan', 'JP', 'EU').
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| office | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
screen_mark Screen a brand name ~66
Screen a brand name against the live trademark registers. Free, no account. Returns every mark near it with a similarity tier, plus which registers were checked. This is the first thing to run when someone asks 'is my name taken'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mark | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
suggest_classes Which classes to file in ~190
Which Nice classes a business like this files in. Free, no account, no database. The question people cannot answer for themselves: not "is my name taken" but "taken in WHAT". Nice has 45 classes and the numbering is opaque — software you download is class 9, software you log into is class 42, and selling other people's goods is class 35 whatever the goods are. Filing in one and not the other is the most expensive routine mistake in the process. Run this BEFORE screen_mark when someone describes a business rather than naming a class: the classes it returns are what makes a screen mean anything. Relay the reasoning, not just the numbers, and keep the closing caveat — this reports how similar businesses file, and their counsel decides what they actually file.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Antevo Trademark MCP server?
Antevo Trademark is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as ch.antevo/trademark. Is that brand name taken? Screen the registers and check the opposition window. No account. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp).
Is the Antevo Trademark MCP server safe to use?
Antevo Trademark scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Antevo Trademark MCP server expose?
Antevo Trademark exposes 4 tools: screen_mark, suggest_classes, holder_read, opposition_window. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 500 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Antevo Trademark MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Antevo Trademark without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Antevo Trademark MCP server still maintained?
Antevo Trademark is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 3 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.