Antevo Trademark
REMOTE · TRADEMARK.ANTEVO.CH · SCANNED AUG 18
Is that brand name taken? Screen the registers and check the opposition window. No account.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 789 tokens (~157/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
- Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
remote · trademark.antevo.ch
claude mcp add --transport http ch-antevo-trademark https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp
[mcp_servers.ch-antevo-trademark] url = "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"ch-antevo-trademark": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add ch-antevo-trademark --url https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
ch-antevo-trademark:
url: "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp" {
"mcpServers": {
"ch-antevo-trademark": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 17 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Aug 26 −1
- Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- New tool “filing_landscape” functional
- New tool “suggest_classes” functional
- 12 Aug 26 67
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Aug 2026 · Probed https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=trademark.antevo.ch | CN=GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 10 Aug 2026 | 10 Feb 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 179555e2ddfe8fecc5a284a75b61189 |
| SANs: trademark.antevo.ch | ||||||
| CN=GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) | CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 2 Nov 2017 | 2 Nov 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | d07782a133fc6f9a57296e131ffd179 |
| CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) | CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US | 1 Aug 2013 | 15 Jan 2038 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 33af1e6a711a9a0bb2864b11d09fae5 |
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of trademark.antevo.ch. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ch. | present | 58745 | 13 | Verified |
| antevo.ch. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://trademark.antevo.ch/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
filing_landscape How busy a class is ~206
Filing activity in a Nice class — volume by month and the busiest filers. Free. Answers "how crowded is my space" and "who keeps filing near me". Pass a Nice class (9, 42, 36…), optionally an office code ('EM', 'US', 'GB', 'CH'), and a window in months. EVERY COUNT IS OF OUR MIRROR, NOT OF THE OFFICE, and the two differ by a lot for some offices right now. Each office carries its own `coverage`, and any office whose mirror is behind is named in `do_not_quote`. Relay that: a low count from a stale office means we have not ingested it, not that nobody filed — reporting it as market activity would be confidently wrong in the direction that makes someone relax.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| jurisdiction | string | – | – |
| months | integer | – | – |
| nice_class | integer | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
holder_read Read a trademark holder ~104
Who a holder is and how they file — the read on an adversary. Free. Computed from their whole register book: how much of it they let lapse, whether their marks cluster where they trade or spray across unrelated classes, and the leverage that gives counsel. Present the evidence, not just the label — and never call anyone a squatter; that is a legal conclusion we do not assert.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
opposition_window Opposition window for an office ~140
How long you have to oppose a filing in a given trademark office, and from when. Twenty registers, each with the provision the window comes from. The trap this answers: most offices run opposition BEFORE registration, from publication of the application, but a minority — Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Sweden — register the mark first and run the window from publication of the REGISTRATION. Applying one office's rule to another invents a deadline that never existed. Accepts a country name, an office name or a two-letter code ('japan', 'JP', 'EU').
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| office | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
screen_mark Screen a brand name ~66
Screen a brand name against the live trademark registers. Free, no account. Returns every mark near it with a similarity tier, plus which registers were checked. This is the first thing to run when someone asks 'is my name taken'.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mark | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
suggest_classes Which classes to file in ~190
Which Nice classes a business like this files in. Free, no account, no database. The question people cannot answer for themselves: not "is my name taken" but "taken in WHAT". Nice has 45 classes and the numbering is opaque — software you download is class 9, software you log into is class 42, and selling other people's goods is class 35 whatever the goods are. Filing in one and not the other is the most expensive routine mistake in the process. Run this BEFORE screen_mark when someone describes a business rather than naming a class: the classes it returns are what makes a screen mean anything. Relay the reasoning, not just the numbers, and keep the closing caveat — this reports how similar businesses file, and their counsel decides what they actually file.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.