Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.cdrn/sigil

NPM · SIGILD · SCANNED SEP 20

Local keystore + MCP server. Claude can sign EVM transactions but never sees the private key.

Available components

+1 this week 94 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 1 of 4 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to cdrn/sigil). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 7 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 356 tokens (~89/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the io.github.cdrn/sigil MCP server?

io.github.cdrn/sigil runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y sigild. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · sigild

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add cdrn-sigil -- npx -y sigild
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cdrn-sigil": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sigild"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "cdrn-sigil": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sigild"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add cdrn-sigil -- npx -y sigild
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "cdrn-sigil": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "sigild"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add cdrn-sigil --command npx --arg -y --arg sigild
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  cdrn-sigil:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "sigild"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "cdrn-sigil": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "sigild"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add cdrn-sigil -t stdio -c npx -a -y sigild
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cdrn-sigil": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sigild"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Sept 26 −2
    • Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
  • 15 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/sigild@0.0.6

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo cdrn/sigil
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/cdrn/sigil/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.0.6
Rekor log index 1578289800
Predicate type https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:64a1b63e375a05daf3eaa49c291dece271f51e62f5c94035ffd1bf5dcc8150f6967f92b127be026259fb462b30f66efaa84f5f7b55cc379ab6d0070a0

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 4 packages
Packages resolved 4
Stale 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~356 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
sigil_eth_sign_message ~100

Sign an EIP-191 personal_sign message with the named portal. The message is supplied as 0x-prefixed hex bytes (encode strings to UTF-8 first). Returns the 65-byte r||s||v signature as 0x-prefixed hex.

NameTypeReqDescription
messagestringyes0x-prefixed hex of the bytes to sign.
portalstringyesPortal handle, e.g. "eth:executor".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

sigil_eth_sign_transaction ~138

Sign an Ethereum transaction (legacy or EIP-1559) with the named portal. Returns the signed transaction as 0x-prefixed hex, ready for eth_sendRawTransaction.

NameTypeReqDescription
portalstringyesPortal handle.
txobjectyesTransaction fields. type="legacy" requires {chainId, nonce, gasPrice, gasLimit, to, value, data}. type="eip1559" requires {chainId, nonce, maxPriorityFeePerGas, maxFeePerGas, gasLimit, to, value, dat…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

sigil_eth_sign_typed_data ~74

Sign an EIP-712 typed data structure with the named portal. Returns the 65-byte signature as 0x-prefixed hex.

NameTypeReqDescription
portalstringyesPortal handle.
typedDataobjectyesEIP-712 typed data: {types, primaryType, domain, message}.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

sigil_list_portals ~44

List the signing portals currently loaded in sigil. Returns each portal handle (e.g. "eth:executor"), its kind, and the public address it controls.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the io.github.cdrn/sigil MCP server?

io.github.cdrn/sigil is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.cdrn/sigil. Local keystore + MCP server. Claude can sign EVM transactions but never sees the private key. This page covers its npm package (sigild).

Is the io.github.cdrn/sigil MCP server safe to use?

io.github.cdrn/sigil scores 94 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.cdrn/sigil MCP server expose?

io.github.cdrn/sigil exposes 4 tools: sigil_list_portals, sigil_eth_sign_message, sigil_eth_sign_transaction, sigil_eth_sign_typed_data. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 356 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.cdrn/sigil MCP server still maintained?

io.github.cdrn/sigil is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.cdrn/sigil MCP server under?

io.github.cdrn/sigil declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.