cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory
REMOTE · BESTAFFILIATEPROGRAMS.CC
Search 4,825 affiliate programs by commission, cookie window and network, with source confidence.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 93% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 618 tokens (~123/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Oct 26 0
- Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
- “search_affiliate_programs” reworded the description of “q” cosmetic
- 15 Oct 26 +7
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “get_affiliate_program” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_categories” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “list_networks” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_affiliate_programs” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 97 → 112 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 90% → 100% ▲ functional
- “get_affiliate_program” reworded the description of “slug” cosmetic
- “search_affiliate_programs” reworded the description of “limit” cosmetic
- Tool “get_affiliate_program” changed its title: Get an affiliate program cosmetic
- Tool “get_directory_stats” changed its title: Get directory statistics cosmetic
- Tool “list_categories” changed its title: List program categories cosmetic
- Tool “list_networks” changed its title: List affiliate networks cosmetic
- Tool “search_affiliate_programs” changed its title: Search affiliate programs cosmetic
- 13 Oct 26 0
- “search_affiliate_programs” reworded the description of “confidence” cosmetic
1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.
- 7 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.90 → pass security
- Schema quality: 80 → 93 ▼ functional
- 4 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 8 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://bestaffiliateprograms.cc/v1/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=bestaffiliateprograms.cc | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 18 Oct 2026 | 16 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5cb83913f0f9b035c7f1543ddac16bc9268 |
| SANs: bestaffiliateprograms.cc | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of bestaffiliateprograms.cc. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| cc. | present | 12593 | 13 | Verified |
| bestaffiliateprograms.cc. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://platform.twitter.com https://www.googletagmanager.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; media-src 'self' https: blob:; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://*.supabase.co wss://*.supabase.co https://api.stripe.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com; worker-src 'self' blob:; frame-src 'self' https://js.stripe.com https://hooks.stripe.com https://www.youtube-nocookie.com https://www.youtube.com https://player.vimeo.com https://www.loom.com https://www.dailymotion.com https://platform.twitter.com; frame-ancestors 'self' http://localhost:* https://o-mega.ai https://*.o-mega.ai https://founden.ai https://*.founden.ai https://*.founden.co https://*.e2b.app https://*.vercel.app; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=(), browsing-topics=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://bestaffiliateprograms.cc/v1/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://bestaffiliateprograms.cc/v1/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://bestaffiliateprograms.cc/v1/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_affiliate_program Get an affiliate program ~70
Get the full record for one affiliate program by its slug (commission, cookie, network, how it pays, requirements, sources, verification date, modelled value).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | The program's slug as returned by search_affiliate_programs, e.g. 'nom-nom'. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_directory_stats Get directory statistics ~44
Headline coverage: total programs, categories, networks, how many are verified against their own source, and how many the site lists that these tools leave out (with why).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_categories List program categories ~28
List the program categories (the keys search_affiliate_programs accepts) with a count for each.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_networks List affiliate networks ~31
List the affiliate networks (the keys search_affiliate_programs accepts) with a count of programs on each.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_affiliate_programs Search affiliate programs ~323
Search and filter the directory of affiliate programs (each compared by network, commission, cookie window, and a MODELLED value per referral). Use to answer 'best/highest-paying affiliate programs for X', or to find programs by category, network, recurring vs one-time, or minimum value. Returns a ranked, paginated list of full program records.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Category key, e.g. saas, finance, hosting, crypto (see list_categories). |
| confidence | string | – | confirmed = rate read on a page the program itself publishes (the brand's own site, or the program's own page on the network that runs it). |
| limit | integer | – | Programs per page, 1-50, default 20. |
| min_value | number | – | Minimum modelled value per referral in USD. |
| network | string | – | Primary network bucket, e.g. Impact, CJ, Awin, In-house (see list_networks). |
| offset | integer | – | Pagination offset. |
| q | string | – | What the programs are for, in plain words: a niche, product or audience ('vpn', 'skincare', 'pet supplements for a dog blog', 'recurring saas'). Read the same way as the site's search; results are th… |
| recurring | boolean | – | true = only recurring-commission programs; false = only one-time. |
| sort | string | – | Default value (highest modelled payout first). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory MCP server?
cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory is a hosted endpoint at https://bestaffiliateprograms.cc/v1/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · bestaffiliateprograms.cc
claude mcp add --transport http cc-bestaffiliateprograms-directory 'https://bestaffiliateprograms.cc/v1/mcp'
What is the cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory MCP server?
cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory. Search 4,825 affiliate programs by commission, cookie window and network, with source confidence. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://bestaffiliateprograms.cc/v1/mcp).
Is the cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory MCP server safe to use?
cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory MCP server expose?
cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory exposes 5 tools: search_affiliate_programs, get_affiliate_program, list_categories, list_networks, get_directory_stats. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 496 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory MCP server still maintained?
cc.bestaffiliateprograms/directory is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.