Privi Verify
REMOTE · PRIVI-VERIFY.ONRENDER.COM
Manufacturing lot verification and chain of custody for AI agents, paid per call in USDC (x402).
Available components
Last scanned (38 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 677 tokens (~112/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
- Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage98
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 92% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (33% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 26 Oct 26 71
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://privi-verify.onrender.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onrender.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137 |
| SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of privi-verify.onrender.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onrender.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://privi-verify.onrender.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://privi-verify.onrender.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://privi-verify.onrender.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
privi_chain_of_custody Chain of custody ~56
Full ordered event history for a lot with each event's fingerprint, plus an integrity check of the whole chain. Paid per call via x402.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lot_code | string | yes | Lot or batch code |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
privi_lookup_fingerprint Look up a record fingerprint ~48
Check whether a record fingerprint (from a label, certificate or document) exists in Privi. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fingerprint | string | yes | 64-character hex SHA-256 record fingerprint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
privi_pricing Privi pricing ~25
List Privi Verify tools, what each costs, and how payment works.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
privi_record_event Record a lot event ~164
Append an event to a lot's history (manufacturers only). Requires 'Authorization: Bearer <key>' with a key from PRIVI_WRITE_KEYS. Over stdio, writes are allowed only when PRIVI_ALLOW_LOCAL_WRITES=1.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| actor | string | yes | Company or person responsible |
| event_type | string | yes | One of: received, produced, inspected, shipped, transferred, recalled |
| location | string | yes | Where it happened, e.g. 'Plant 2, Port Huron MI' |
| lot_code | string | yes | Lot or batch code |
| notes | string | – | – |
| product | string | – | Product name or part number |
| quantity | string | – | Quantity with units, e.g. '500 kg' |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
privi_token_market PRIVI token market ~126
PRIVI on Base: price, how much PRIVI and USDC the Privi swap desk holds (so whether a swap can fill), any Uniswap v3 / Aerodrome pools, and optionally a swap quote. Every paid Privi tool also accepts PRIVI. Free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | string | – | Amount to swap in (USDC for buy, PRIVI for sell), e.g. '25' |
| side | string | – | Optional swap quote: 'buy' (USDC -> PRIVI) or 'sell' (PRIVI -> USDC) |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
privi_verify_lot Verify a lot ~56
Verify a lot: product, first and latest custody events, recall status, and whether its record history is intact. Paid per call via x402.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| lot_code | string | yes | Lot or batch code to verify |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Privi Verify MCP server?
Privi Verify is a hosted endpoint at https://privi-verify.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · privi-verify.onrender.com
claude mcp add --transport http canoydario847-cloud-privi-verify 'https://privi-verify.onrender.com/mcp'
What is the Privi Verify MCP server?
Privi Verify is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.canoydario847-cloud/privi-verify. Manufacturing lot verification and chain of custody for AI agents, paid per call in USDC (x402). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://privi-verify.onrender.com/mcp).
Is the Privi Verify MCP server safe to use?
Privi Verify scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Privi Verify MCP server expose?
Privi Verify exposes 6 tools: privi_token_market, privi_pricing, privi_lookup_fingerprint, privi_verify_lot, privi_chain_of_custody, privi_record_event. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 475 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Privi Verify MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Privi Verify without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Privi Verify MCP server still maintained?
Privi Verify is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.