Darwin RAG
PYPI · DARWIN-RAG · SCANNED SEP 22
Local-first RAG engine with MCP server for AI agent integration.
Available components
Recent critical change
CVE-2026-49468 affects this package (4 Aug 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security74
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 25 of 180 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency32
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: no license is declared. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 26 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox run of this package has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →
How do I install the Darwin RAG MCP server?
Darwin RAG runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx darwin-rag. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · darwin-rag
claude mcp add brightdotdev-darwin-rag -- uvx darwin-rag
{
"mcpServers": {
"brightdotdev-darwin-rag": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"darwin-rag"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"brightdotdev-darwin-rag": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"darwin-rag"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add brightdotdev-darwin-rag -- uvx darwin-rag
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"brightdotdev-darwin-rag": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"darwin-rag"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add brightdotdev-darwin-rag --command uvx --arg darwin-rag
mcp_servers:
brightdotdev-darwin-rag:
command: "uvx"
args: ["darwin-rag"] {
"McpServers": {
"brightdotdev-darwin-rag": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"darwin-rag"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add brightdotdev-darwin-rag -t stdio -c uvx -a darwin-rag
{
"mcpServers": {
"brightdotdev-darwin-rag": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"darwin-rag"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 26 Aug 26 0
- First check of Tool safety: unverified security
- Package version: 0.2.17 → 0.2.18 functional
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 18 Aug 26 0
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Package version: 0.2.15 → 0.2.17 functional
- 17 Aug 26 0
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 12 Aug 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 10 Aug 26 0
- Package version: 0.2.14 → 0.2.15 functional
- 8 Aug 26 0
- Package version: 0.2.13 → 0.2.14 functional
- 5 Aug 26 0
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/darwin-rag@0.2.18
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Vulnerabilities 34 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-2fqr-mr3j-6wp8 | CVE-2026-54279 | low | yes | |
| GHSA-4fvr-rgm6-gqmc | CVE-2026-54273 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-4m7w-qmgq-4wj5 | CVE-2026-54275 | low | yes | |
| GHSA-63hw-fmq6-xxg2 | CVE-2026-54277 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-9x8q-7h8h-wcw9 | CVE-2026-54280 | low | yes | |
| GHSA-cq5v-8q36-5273 | CVE-2026-69244 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-g3cq-j2xw-wf74 | CVE-2026-54278 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-hg6j-4rv6-33pg | CVE-2026-47265 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-hpj7-wq8m-9hgp | CVE-2026-54276 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-jg22-mg44-37j8 | CVE-2026-34993 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-m6qw-4cw2-hm4m | CVE-2026-50269 | low | yes | |
| GHSA-mfx4-hv73-q22v | CVE-2026-69243 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-mq44-7p77-q5h7 | CVE-2026-59881 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-xcgm-r5h9-7989 | CVE-2026-54274 | medium | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-2104 | CVE-2026-34993 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2105 | CVE-2026-47265 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2106 | CVE-2026-50269 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2107 | CVE-2026-54273 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2108 | CVE-2026-54274 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2109 | CVE-2026-54276 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2110 | CVE-2026-54277 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2111 | CVE-2026-54278 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2112 | CVE-2026-54279 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2113 | CVE-2026-54280 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-237 | CVE-2026-54275 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-3545 | CVE-2026-69244 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3546 | CVE-2026-69243 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3547 | CVE-2026-59881 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-2132 | CVE-2026-7246 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-4jcj-7x88-m979 | CVE-2026-12773 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-4xpc-pv4p-pm3w | CVE-2026-49468 | critical | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-7488-6r32-c95q | CVE-2026-59822 | high | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3479 | CVE-2026-59822 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-388 | CVE-2026-49468 | none | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 180 packages
| Packages resolved | 180 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 25 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.