Softoteca
REMOTE · SOFTOTECA.COM.BR
Catálogo de software do Brasil: fichas com a origem de cada dado, preços em reais e comparação.
Available components
Last scanned (13 hours ago)
Scores higher than 64% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security66
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1543 tokens (~171/item across 9 items; 9 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
- Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 9 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 10 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (12)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (1)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- HTTPS in Endpoint SecurityHTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: 890 → 1543 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- New tool “estatisticas_da_categoria” functional
- New tool “listar_avaliacoes” functional
- New tool “listar_reclamacoes” functional
- New tool “obter_reputacao” functional
- “buscar_softwares” added an optional parameter “origem” cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://softoteca.com.br/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=softoteca.com.br | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 17 Oct 2026 | 15 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | edfc64826f0d4ba40ed819b3aca69ca7 |
| SANs: softoteca.com.br, *.softoteca.com.br | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of softoteca.com.br. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| br. | DS published | 38298 | 13 | Verified |
| com.br. | DS published | 50930 | 13 | Verified |
| softoteca.com.br. | DS published | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| softoteca.com.br. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://softoteca.com.br/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://softoteca.com.br/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
alternativas Alternativas ~99
Lista outros softwares publicados nas mesmas categorias de um software do catálogo, com as categorias em comum, primeiro os que têm mais categorias em comum. Use quando a pessoa pedir alternativas, concorrentes ou substitutos de um software.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pagina | integer | – | Página dos resultados, a partir de 1. São 20 por página. |
| slug | string | yes | Slug do software, como vem da busca ou do endereço softoteca.com.br/software/{slug}. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
buscar_softwares Buscar softwares ~426
Busca softwares no catálogo publicado da Softoteca, o catálogo de software do Brasil (B2B e B2C), com preços em reais. Use quando a pessoa pedir indicação, lista ou opções de software para uma necessidade (ex.: controle de ponto, ERP, emissão de nota fiscal), com filtros opcionais de categoria, tipo, plataforma e preço máximo. Devolve até 20 softwares por chamada, em ordem alfabética, com resumo factual, fornecedor, categorias, menor preço publicado e url_canonica. Para os detalhes de um software, use obter_ficha.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categoria | string | – | Slug da categoria, como vem da lista de categorias (ex.: "controle-de-ponto"). Veja listar_categorias. |
| consulta | string | yes | O que se procura, em poucas palavras (ex.: "controle de ponto", "emissão de NFS-e"). Cada palavra precisa aparecer no nome, no resumo, na descrição, no fornecedor ou nas categorias, sem diferença de… |
| origem | string | – | Origem da empresa fornecedora: brasileira (sede no Brasil, comprovada no site do fornecedor) ou internacional (a filial brasileira de grupo estrangeiro conta como internacional). Fica de fora o softw… |
| pagina | integer | – | Página dos resultados, a partir de 1. São 20 por página. |
| plataforma | string | – | Plataforma em que o software precisa rodar: web, windows, macos, linux, ios, android. |
| preco_max_brl | number | – | Preço máximo em reais. Fica o software com plano gratuito ou com ao menos um plano de preço publicado até esse valor, na periodicidade do próprio plano (mensal, anual ou pagamento único). |
| tipo | string | – | B2B para software de empresas, B2C para software de consumidores. Software que atende os dois entra nos dois. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
comparar_softwares Comparar softwares ~89
Compara de 2 a 4 softwares do catálogo lado a lado: quadro com preço, campos da ficha, integrações e conformidade, com a origem e a fonte de cada valor. Use quando a pessoa quiser saber a diferença entre softwares ou escolher entre eles.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slugs | array | yes | De 2 a 4 slugs de softwares diferentes, como vêm de buscar_softwares. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
estatisticas_da_categoria Estatísticas da categoria ~207
Números da categoria calculados das fichas publicadas: quantos softwares publicam preço; o menor, a mediana e o maior preço em reais por usuário e por empresa por mês; plano gratuito e teste grátis; o menor plano de cada software; e o raio-X das fichas técnicas (API, app, LGPD, interface e suporte em português, origem da empresa e integrações mais comuns), com a definição e a base de cada número. precos vem null com menos de 3 softwares com preço publicado; raio_x, com menos de 3 fichas com ficha técnica. Use quando a pessoa perguntar quanto custa um tipo de software, quantos publicam preço ou quantos têm um recurso. Cite a url_canonica da seção (precos ou raio_x) e a data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categoria | string | yes | Slug da categoria, como vem da lista de categorias (ex.: "controle-de-ponto"). Veja listar_categorias. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
listar_avaliacoes Avaliações de um software ~96
Avaliações publicadas de um software, com as notas, os pontos positivos e negativos, o selo de uso verificado e a resposta do fornecedor, das mais recentes para as mais antigas.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pagina | integer | – | Página dos resultados, a partir de 1. São 20 por página. |
| slug | string | yes | Slug do software, como vem da busca ou do endereço softoteca.com.br/software/{slug}. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
listar_categorias Listar categorias ~99
Lista as categorias do catálogo que têm software publicado, com o slug, o tipo (B2B ou B2C) e quantos softwares cada uma tem. Use para achar o slug certo antes de buscar_softwares com filtro de categoria, ou para mostrar o que o catálogo cobre.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| tipo | string | – | B2B para software de empresas, B2C para software de consumidores. Software que atende os dois entra nos dois. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
listar_reclamacoes Reclamações de um software ~87
Reclamações publicadas de um software, com a situação, as respostas do fornecedor e as mensagens, das mais recentes para as mais antigas.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pagina | integer | – | Página dos resultados, a partir de 1. São 20 por página. |
| slug | string | yes | Slug do software, como vem da busca ou do endereço softoteca.com.br/software/{slug}. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
obter_ficha Obter ficha ~119
Devolve a ficha técnica completa de um software do catálogo: cada campo com valor, origem e URL da fonte, planos e preços em reais, integrações, conformidade (LGPD, eSocial, NF-e e outros), fornecedor e categorias. Use depois de buscar_softwares, ou quando a pessoa citar um software e o slug for conhecido. Cite a url_canonica e a fonte_url de cada dado.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Slug do software, como vem da busca ou do endereço softoteca.com.br/software/{slug}. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
obter_reputacao Indicadores de avaliações e reclamações ~131
Indicadores de um software a partir das avaliações e reclamações publicadas na Softoteca depois da moderação: nota geral, uso verificado, voltaria a usar, taxa de resposta do fornecedor, tempo da primeira resposta e índice de solução, nos últimos 12 meses e no histórico. Abaixo de 5, o indicador vem null (dados insuficientes). Use quando a pessoa perguntar se um software é bem avaliado ou se o fornecedor responde às reclamações.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Slug do software, como vem da busca ou do endereço softoteca.com.br/software/{slug}. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Softoteca MCP server?
Softoteca is a hosted endpoint at https://softoteca.com.br/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · softoteca.com.br
claude mcp add --transport http br-com-softoteca-catalogo 'https://softoteca.com.br/mcp'
What is the Softoteca MCP server?
Softoteca is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as br.com.softoteca/catalogo. Catálogo de software do Brasil: fichas com a origem de cada dado, preços em reais e comparação. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://softoteca.com.br/mcp).
Is the Softoteca MCP server safe to use?
Softoteca scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Softoteca MCP server expose?
Softoteca exposes 9 tools: buscar_softwares, obter_ficha, comparar_softwares, listar_categorias, alternativas, and 4 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,353 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Softoteca MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Softoteca without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Softoteca MCP server still maintained?
Softoteca is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Softoteca MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on Softoteca, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 8 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Softoteca: HTTPS. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.