Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.bmoldo/terraback

PYPI · TERRABACK

Scan AWS/Azure/GCP and generate Terraform HCL with import blocks, deterministically, for AI agents.

Available components

0 this week 0 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 0% of PyPI servers

Category Cloud Infrastructure

Recent critical change

CVE-2026-102268 affects this package (30 Sept 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security68
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Declares code that runs automatically (setup.py, build-time code we could not rule out (a Hatch, PDM or setuptools build hook, a dynamic version we could not read statically, shipped VCS metadata or a stray root module)) and that we could not recognise. It may be perfectly ordinary, but we have not established what it does. View diagnostics → Partial
  • 10 of 152 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency6
  • Repository check failed: no source repository is declared. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Licence could not be checked: the licence is declared in free text we could not match to a standard (SPDX) licence identifier, so we cannot tell whether it is OSI-approved.Unverified
  • Actively maintained (last published 42 days ago).Pass
  • Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1903 tokens (~317/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: pass → 0.67 functional
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 30 Oct 26 0
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 29 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/terraback@0.6.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 2 scripts
Hook Tier Command
setup_py unreviewed <setup.py, unreviewed>
build_hook unreviewed legacy backend root module

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Vulnerabilities 52 findings
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-m5vv-6r4h-3vj9 CVE-2024-35255 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-1209 CVE-2024-35255 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N yes
GHSA-7gcm-g887-7qv7 CVE-2026-0994 high yes
PYSEC-2026-1805 CVE-2026-0994 none yes
GHSA-5239-wwwm-4pmq CVE-2026-4539 low CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
PYSEC-2026-2987 CVE-2026-4539 low CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
GHSA-2gx3-rcp4-g85q CVE-2026-101917 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
GHSA-42vr-xj54-vc7v CVE-2026-101918 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
GHSA-752w-5fwx-jx9f CVE-2026-32597 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-993g-76c3-p5m4 CVE-2026-48522 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N yes
GHSA-9v7f-9g4p-ffgj CVE-2026-102267 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-ffc3-869f-jxw9 CVE-2026-102268 critical CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-fhv5-28vv-h8m8 CVE-2026-48524 low CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
GHSA-hxm8-2xgr-2p9m CVE-2026-102269 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N yes
GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f CVE-2026-48523 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N yes
GHSA-jwrc-g2q2-pq5p CVE-2026-102270 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-p4g4-x82p-q773 CVE-2026-102271 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-pxh4-856f-4h89 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-w6j9-cwv2-h6wq CVE-2026-102274 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-w7vc-732c-9m39 CVE-2026-48525 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
GHSA-x33g-cr3x-6449 CVE-2026-102275 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-xgmm-8j9v-c9wx CVE-2026-48526 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
PYSEC-2025-183 CVE-2025-45768 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H no
PYSEC-2026-120 CVE-2026-32597 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-175 CVE-2026-48522 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-176 CVE-2026-48523 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-177 CVE-2026-48524 low CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
PYSEC-2026-178 CVE-2026-48525 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
PYSEC-2026-179 CVE-2026-48526 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-4140 CVE-2026-101917 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
PYSEC-2026-4141 CVE-2026-101918 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L yes
PYSEC-2026-4144 CVE-2026-102267 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-4145 CVE-2026-102268 critical CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-4147 CVE-2026-102269 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-4148 CVE-2026-102270 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-4149 CVE-2026-102271 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-4152 CVE-2026-102274 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-4183 CVE-2026-102275 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N yes
GHSA-2xpw-w6gg-jr37 CVE-2025-66471 high yes
GHSA-38jv-5279-wg99 CVE-2026-21441 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-8988-9cw3-xx77 CVE-2026-97687 high yes
GHSA-gm62-xv2j-4w53 CVE-2025-66418 high yes
GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v CVE-2025-50181 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N yes
GHSA-qccp-gfcp-xxvc CVE-2026-44431 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N yes
GHSA-vxq7-64xx-v4gw CVE-2026-97689 high yes
PYSEC-2026-141 CVE-2026-44431 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N yes
PYSEC-2026-1994 CVE-2025-66471 none yes
PYSEC-2026-1996 CVE-2026-21441 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
PYSEC-2026-1998 CVE-2025-66418 none yes
PYSEC-2026-1999 CVE-2025-50181 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N yes

Showing 50 of 52 vulnerabilities.

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 152 packages
Packages resolved 152
Stale 10
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,903 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
codify_batch ~454

Scan and generate Terraform HCL + import blocks for a batch of resources. Everything is scanned into an isolated staging area first; nothing is written to output_dir unless the batch is within your license's resource cap. Nothing is imported into Terraform state by this tool - it only generates code. License cap: on the Community tier, a single call is capped at 25 total resources (after tag_filters are applied, before exclude_managed is applied). If the scope has more than that, this tool returns {"error": "resource_cap_exceeded", "total", "cap", "counts_by_type", "hint"} and writes nothing - narrow the request with `types` or `tag_filters`, or upgrade to Professional/Enterprise for unlimited batch size. exclude_managed behavior (v1): when True and state_files are given, resources whose scanned id/ARN already appears in one of the local state files are fully excluded from the generated output (not merely flagged). Requires state_files - if omitted, a warning is returned and nothing is excluded. v1 supports LOCAL state file paths only. Args: provider: Cloud provider - "aws", "azure", or "gcp". scope: AWS = region, Azure = subscription ID, GCP = project ID. types: Optional list of resource type names to restrict the batch to. tag_filters: Optional dict of tag key/value pairs a resource must match on (all pairs required). output_dir: Directory to write the generated Terraform into. exclude_managed: Drop resources already present in state_files. state_files: Paths to local Terraform state JSON files. profile: AWS named profile to use (ignored for azure/gcp). Returns: On success: {"output_dir", "files": [...], "resource_counts": {...}, "total", "warnings": [...], "errors": [...]}.

NameTypeReqDescription
exclude_managedboolean––
output_dirstring––
profile–––
providerstringyes–
scopestringyes–
state_files–––
tag_filters–––
types–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

codify_resource ~342

Generate Terraform HCL and an import block for exactly one resource. Scans just the requested resource type in the given scope, locates the resource matching resource_id, and writes a single .tf file plus a matching import JSON entry into output_dir. Nothing is imported into Terraform state by this tool - it only generates code; import is a separate, explicit step outside this MCP interface. Args: provider: Cloud provider - "aws", "azure", or "gcp". scope: AWS = region, Azure = subscription ID, GCP = project ID. type: Resource type name, bare (e.g. "ec2") or full registry key (e.g. "aws_ec2"). Call list_supported_resources to see valid types. resource_id: The cloud-provider id (or ARN) of the resource to codify. output_dir: Directory to write the generated Terraform into. profile: AWS named profile to use (ignored for azure/gcp). Returns: {"hcl": "<generated .tf file contents>", "import_block": {...}, "files": [<tf file path>, <import json path>], "dependencies": [...]} Raises: If the type is unknown or the resource_id is not found, an error result is returned listing up to 20 available ids for that type/scope so the caller can self-correct.

NameTypeReqDescription
output_dirstring––
profile–––
providerstringyes–
resource_idstringyes–
scopestringyes–
typestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

detect_unmanaged ~290

Diff a live cloud inventory against local Terraform state to find unmanaged resources. Read-only: runs a scan_infrastructure-equivalent scan and compares resource ids/ARNs against what your Terraform state already tracks. Nothing is written to state and nothing is imported. v1 limitation: state_files must be LOCAL file paths (e.g. a checked-out `terraform.tfstate`, or the output of `terraform state pull > state.json`). Remote backends (S3, azurerm, GCS, Terraform Cloud/Enterprise) are not read directly - pull the state to a local file first. Args: provider: Cloud provider - "aws", "azure", or "gcp". scope: AWS = region, Azure = subscription ID, GCP = project ID. state_files: Paths to one or more local Terraform state JSON files. types: Optional list of resource type names to restrict the scan to. workdir: Directory for scratch scan output and the inventory file. Returns: {"unmanaged": {"<type>": [resource, ...], ...}, "managed_count": N, "unmanaged_count": N, "state_files_read": [...], "warnings": [...]}

NameTypeReqDescription
providerstringyes–
scopestringyes–
state_filesarrayyes–
types–––
workdir–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

list_supported_resources ~175

List resource types terraback can scan/codify, grouped by provider. Read-only and does not touch any cloud provider - this only reports what terraback's scan registry supports. Args: provider: Restrict the listing to one provider - "aws", "azure", or "gcp". Omit to list all three. Returns: {"providers": {"aws": [{"type": "aws_ec2", "tier": "community"}, ...], "azure": [...], "gcp": [...]}, "counts": {"aws": N, "azure": N, "gcp": N, "total": N}}. "tier" is "community", "professional", or "enterprise" - types above your license tier will fail if scanned.

NameTypeReqDescription
provider–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

scan_infrastructure ~441

Run a read-only inventory scan of live cloud infrastructure. This is a discovery tool: it enumerates what currently exists in the given scope. It never writes Terraform files, never touches Terraform state, and never imports anything - it only reads from the cloud provider's API. Args: provider: Cloud provider - "aws", "azure", or "gcp". scope: The scan boundary. For AWS this is a region (e.g. "us-east-1"). For Azure this is a subscription ID. For GCP this is a project ID. types: Optional list of resource type names to restrict the scan to, e.g. ["ec2", "aws_vpc"]. Both bare names and full registry keys are accepted. Omit to scan every resource type registered for the provider (call list_supported_resources first to see the full list). tag_filters: Optional dict of tag key/value pairs a resource must match on (all pairs required). Resources with no discoverable tags are excluded whenever this is supplied. workdir: Directory to use for scratch scan output and the full inventory JSON file. Defaults to a directory under the system temp directory if omitted. profile: AWS named profile to use (ignored for azure/gcp). Returns: A dict with "summary" (total count and counts by resource type), "inventory_file" (path to the full JSON inventory on disk - always written, useful when the inventory is large), "resources" (the full list of {type, id, name, provider, scope} entries, only included inline when there are 200 or fewer - for larger inventories, read inventory_file instead), and "errors" (per resource-type scan failures, if any - a failing scanner does not abort the rest of the scan).

NameTypeReqDescription
profile–––
providerstringyes–
scopestringyes–
tag_filters–––
types–––
workdir–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

verify_plan ~201

Run a read-only `terraform plan` against a generated directory and report drift. Never applies, imports, or otherwise mutates Terraform state - this only runs `terraform init` (if needed) and `terraform plan`. Requires Terraform >= 1.5 (import block support) installed and on PATH. Args: terraform_dir: Directory containing the generated .tf files. Returns: On success: {"drift": "none"|"drift_detected"|"plan_failed", "summary": {"imports", "adds", "changes", "destroys"}, "add_resources": [...], "change_resources": [...], "destroy_resources": [...]}. "drift" is "none" when adds == changes == destroys == 0 - pending imports alone are expected and are not drift. On a missing/too-old Terraform binary: {"error", "detail"}.

NameTypeReqDescription
terraform_dirstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultobjectyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.bmoldo/terraback MCP server?

io.github.bmoldo/terraback runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx terraback. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · terraback

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add bmoldo-terraback -- uvx terraback
Common questions

What is the io.github.bmoldo/terraback MCP server?

io.github.bmoldo/terraback is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.bmoldo/terraback. Scan AWS/Azure/GCP and generate Terraform HCL with import blocks, deterministically, for AI agents. This page covers its PyPI package (terraback).

What tools does the io.github.bmoldo/terraback MCP server expose?

io.github.bmoldo/terraback exposes 6 tools: scan_infrastructure, detect_unmanaged, codify_resource, codify_batch, verify_plan, list_supported_resources. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,903 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.bmoldo/terraback MCP server still maintained?

io.github.bmoldo/terraback is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.