Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp

NPM · @SIGNWELL/MCP

Send documents for e-signature, track signing, and manage templates in SignWell from any MCP client.

Available components

0 this week 43 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 26% of npm servers

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security80
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.29.0, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 41 of 111 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to Bidsketch/signwell-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because our sandbox has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Oct 26 0
    • Package version: 0.3.7 → 0.3.8 functional
  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • CVE-2026-111771 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • CVE-2026-111768 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • CVE-2026-111769 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • CVE-2026-111767 affects this package: high ▼ security
  • 12 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 11 Oct 26 −6
    • CVE-2026-104850 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 30 Sept 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 29 Sept 26 34

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Analysed npm/@signwell/mcp@0.3.8

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo Bidsketch/signwell-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/Bidsketch/signwell-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.3.8
Rekor log index 3397897910
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:a3d1cf423cbad95c858f76a14901f482d6691255d55bb8f9294d76712c26014a6bf0127a99dbcd3dac06afa2d2e22ff3c3a8d9ec8d9d49ccfcde108ca

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 5 findings
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw CVE-2026-111767 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L yes
GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 CVE-2026-111768 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes
GHSA-6prh-2h8m-c8cw CVE-2026-111769 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N yes
GHSA-6qxp-vccf-f47h CVE-2026-104850 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N yes
GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pq CVE-2026-111771 medium CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 111 packages
Packages resolved 111
Stale 41
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.

Install

How do I install the io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp server?

io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @signwell/mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @signwell/mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add bidsketch-signwell-mcp -- npx -y @signwell/mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp server?

io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp. Send documents for e-signature, track signing, and manage templates in SignWell from any MCP client. This page covers its npm package (@signwell/mcp).

Is the io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp scores 43 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 5 known advisories against it as of 23 October 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Is the io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp server under?

io.github.Bidsketch/signwell-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.