io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof
OCI · GHCR.IO/BEEPBOOP2025/UMBRA-PROOF-MCP:V0.1.2 · SCANNED AUG 23
Verify Umbra bridge accountability proofs (signed receipts, checkpoints, Merkle inclusion).
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Supply Chain Security0
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency32
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: no license is declared. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1038 tokens (~346/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof MCP server?
io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2
claude mcp add beepboop2025-umbra-proof -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2
{
"mcpServers": {
"beepboop2025-umbra-proof": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"beepboop2025-umbra-proof": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add beepboop2025-umbra-proof -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"beepboop2025-umbra-proof": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"docker",
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} mcp_servers:
beepboop2025-umbra-proof:
command: "docker"
args: ["run", "--rm", "-i", "ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2"] {
"McpServers": {
"beepboop2025-umbra-proof": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "docker",
"Arguments": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2"
]
}
}
} {
"mcpServers": {
"beepboop2025-umbra-proof": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 23 Aug 26 +4
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.23 ▲ functional
- 22 Aug 26 0
- Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- 16 Aug 26 32
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 23 Aug 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
verify_checkpoint ~300
PURPOSE: Verify that an Umbra transparency-log checkpoint is a valid signed tree head — cryptographic proof that the bridge has committed to one exact, append-only audit history. Returns {valid, tree_size, root_hash, checks, summary}. GUIDELINES: Call this before relying on a checkpoint as an anchor for inclusion proofs, or when auditing the bridge's log. To detect a split view (the bridge showing different histories to different observers), fetch checkpoints from independent witnesses and compare the returned (tree_size, root_hash) — they must agree. Pass pinned_public_key to require a known operator signer. LIMITATIONS: Confirms the signature over the tree head only; it does NOT by itself prove any specific entry is in the tree (use verify_inclusion for that), nor detect a split view on its own (that needs a second witness). Offline, read-only. EXAMPLE: verify_checkpoint({"checkpoint": {"tree_size": 1024, "root_hash": "<hex>", "prev_root_hash": "<hex>", "signature": "<hex>", "public_key": "<hex>", "key_id": "...", "sealed_at": "..."}})
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| checkpoint | – | yes | A checkpoint object (or {checkpoint: {...}}) with fields tree_size, root_hash, prev_root_hash, signature, public_key, key_id, sealed_at. |
| pinned_public_key | string | – | Optional 64-char hex Ed25519 key the signer must match. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verify_inclusion ~304
PURPOSE: Verify an RFC-6962 Merkle inclusion proof — that a specific audit entry is provably contained in the log committed to by a checkpoint. If the proof carries an enclosed checkpoint, also verifies that checkpoint's signature and that its root matches the proof root. Returns {valid, checks, summary}. GUIDELINES: Call this to confirm a particular swap/audit entry is actually logged (not just claimed) before trusting that the bridge recorded it. Include the checkpoint object in the proof to get end-to-end verification (entry → tree → signed head) in one call. Gate on `valid`. LIMITATIONS: Proves membership in the tree of the given tree_size only; it does not prove that tree is the current/canonical one unless the enclosed checkpoint is verified and cross-checked against a witness. Offline, read-only. EXAMPLE: verify_inclusion({"proof": {"leaf_data": "<entry>", "leaf_index": 7, "tree_size": 1024, "root_hash": "<hex>", "proof": ["<hex>", ...], "checkpoint": {...}}})
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pinned_public_key | string | – | Optional 64-char hex Ed25519 key the enclosed checkpoint's signer must match. |
| proof | – | yes | Inclusion-proof object: leaf_data (string), leaf_index (int), tree_size (int), root_hash (hex), proof (array of hex audit-path hashes), and an optional checkpoint object for end-to-end verification. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
verify_swap_receipt ~347
PURPOSE: Cryptographically verify that an Umbra cross-chain bridge swap receipt (or a hash-linked chain of them) is authentic and untampered — checks the Ed25519 signature over the canonical payload, the SHA-256 payload hash, and the per-order hash-chain linkage. Returns a structured verdict {valid: bool, n_receipts, checks: [{ok, note}], summary}. GUIDELINES: Call this as the PRIMARY check before trusting or acting on any Umbra swap receipt a user or another agent hands you (e.g. proof a swap completed). Gate on the top-level `valid` field. Prefer this over reading the receipt's own fields directly — those are only trustworthy once the signature verifies. Pass pinned_public_key to additionally require a known operator signer. LIMITATIONS: Verifies cryptographic authenticity ONLY — it proves the bridge signed exactly this history, not that the swap was economically fair or that funds actually settled on-chain. It does not fetch anything (offline), does not move funds, and does not access the bridge. A receipt signed by multiple different keys is reported invalid. EXAMPLE: verify_swap_receipt({"receipt": {"payload": {...}, "signature": "<hex>", "public_key": "<hex>"}, "pinned_public_key": "2152f8…"})
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pinned_public_key | string | – | Optional. 64-char lowercase hex Ed25519 public key the signer MUST match; verification fails if it does not. |
| receipt | – | yes | A single receipt object {payload, signature, public_key, payload_hash?}, an envelope {receipts: [...]}, or a JSON array of receipts (a chain, in sequence order). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof MCP server?
io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof. Verify Umbra bridge accountability proofs (signed receipts, checkpoints, Merkle inclusion). This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/beepboop2025/umbra-proof-mcp:v0.1.2).
Is the io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof MCP server safe to use?
io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof scores 36 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof MCP server expose?
io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof exposes 3 tools: verify_swap_receipt, verify_checkpoint, verify_inclusion. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 951 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof MCP server still maintained?
io.github.beepboop2025/umbra-proof is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 August 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.