LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway
REMOTE · TRADE-SAFETY.LIQUILENS.IN · SCANNED SEP 20
Read-only checks for proposed orders against evidence and policy; no trading or payment authority.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security77
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 118 tokens (~59/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management50
- Stability observed for 15 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway MCP server?
LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway is a hosted endpoint at https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · trade-safety.liquilens.in
claude mcp add --transport http beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway 'https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway": {
"url": "https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway] url = "https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway --url 'https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway:
url: "https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway -t streamable-http -u 'https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"beepboop2025-liquilens-trade-safety-gateway": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 8 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 6 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=trade-safety.liquilens.in | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 4 Sept 2026 | 3 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 6c06ff66e3e816b20551377fbc4eb21f115 |
| SANs: trade-safety.liquilens.in | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of trade-safety.liquilens.in. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| in. | present | 10094 | 13 | Verified |
| liquilens.in. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| trade-safety.liquilens.in. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
assess_trade_safety Assess exact-order trade safety ~80
Read fixed public native Trade Safety context from Seiche and Undertow, plus conditional LiquiLens context, and issue a short-lived SHA-256-only sandbox receipt. This tool cannot recommend, preview with a broker, route, resize, custody, settle, or execute an order.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| policy | object | yes | – |
| request | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
trade_safety_capabilities Trade-safety gateway capabilities ~23
Describe the static sandbox authority, fixed sources, and limits.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway MCP server?
LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.beepboop2025/liquilens-trade-safety-gateway. Read-only checks for proposed orders against evidence and policy; no trading or payment authority. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://trade-safety.liquilens.in/mcp).
Is the LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway MCP server safe to use?
LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway MCP server expose?
LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway exposes 2 tools: assess_trade_safety, trade_safety_capabilities. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 103 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway MCP server still maintained?
LiquiLens Trade Safety Gateway is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.