io.github.bch1212/agentfetch
PYPI · AGENTFETCH-MCP
Token-budgeted web fetch for AI agents — auto-routes Jina, FireCrawl, Trafilatura, PDF.
Available components
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 0% of PyPI servers
Category Web Scraping
Recent critical change
GHSA-6q48-6c7w-9gw2 affects this package (21 Oct 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security74
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 7 of 63 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 190 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 912 tokens (~228/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 31 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 29 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
- 23 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 22 Oct 26 0
- GHSA-6q48-6c7w-9gw2 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 21 Oct 26 0
- GHSA-6q48-6c7w-9gw2 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- 16 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 3 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.77 functional
- 2 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/agentfetch-mcp@1.0.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Vulnerabilities 32 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-5h2m-4q8j-pqpj | CVE-2025-69196 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-c2jp-c369-7pvx | high | yes | ||
| GHSA-m8x7-r2rg-vh5g | CVE-2025-64340 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-mxxr-jv3v-6pgc | CVE-2025-62800 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-rcfx-77hg-w2wv | high | yes | ||
| GHSA-rj5c-58rq-j5g5 | CVE-2025-62801 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-rww4-4w9c-7733 | CVE-2026-27124 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-vv7q-7jx5-f767 | CVE-2026-32871 | critical | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-1364 | CVE-2025-62800 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-1365 | CVE-2025-62801 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-2474 | CVE-2025-69196 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-2475 | CVE-2025-64340 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2476 | CVE-2026-27124 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-338 | CVE-2026-32871 | critical | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-vfmq-68hx-4jfw | CVE-2026-41066 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-87 | CVE-2026-41066 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-4vvm-4w3v-6mr8 | CVE-2023-36464 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | no |
| PYSEC-2026-1835 | CVE-2023-36464 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-2xpw-w6gg-jr37 | CVE-2025-66471 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-38jv-5279-wg99 | CVE-2026-21441 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-8988-9cw3-xx77 | CVE-2026-97687 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-gm62-xv2j-4w53 | CVE-2025-66418 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v | CVE-2025-50181 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-qccp-gfcp-xxvc | CVE-2026-44431 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-vxq7-64xx-v4gw | CVE-2026-97689 | high | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-141 | CVE-2026-44431 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-1994 | CVE-2025-66471 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-1996 | CVE-2026-21441 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-1998 | CVE-2025-66418 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-1999 | CVE-2025-50181 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-4175 | CVE-2026-97687 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-4177 | CVE-2026-97689 | none | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 63 packages
| Packages resolved | 63 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 6 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
estimate_tokens ~196
Estimate token count of a URL's content WITHOUT fetching the body. WHEN TO USE: - You're considering fetching a URL but unsure if it fits your remaining context window. This call is ~10x cheaper than a full fetch. - You want to triage a list of candidate URLs before deciding which to actually retrieve. IMPORTANT: Many servers omit Content-Length on dynamic / chunked responses. When that happens, this tool returns confident=false and estimated_tokens=null. In that case, call fetch_url with a max_tokens cap instead of trusting the estimate. Args: url: The URL to estimate. Returns: { "url": str, "success": bool, "estimated_tokens": int | null, "byte_size": int | null, "content_type": str, "confident": bool, "note": str }
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
fetch_multiple ~169
Fetch up to 20 URLs concurrently. Each result is the same shape as fetch_url. WHEN TO USE: - You have a list of URLs (search results, links from a doc, sitemap) and want them retrieved in parallel rather than one at a time. Args: urls: 1–20 URLs. Larger batches: split into multiple calls. max_tokens_each: Per-result cap. Apply this to keep total response inside your context budget — total ≈ len(urls) * max_tokens_each. use_cache: True for cache-aware fetching (default). Returns: {"count": int, "results": [<fetch_url shape>, ...]}
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_tokens_each | – | – | – |
| urls | array | yes | – |
| use_cache | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
fetch_url ~365
Fetch any URL and return clean, LLM-ready Markdown with token count, metadata, and 6h caching. WHEN TO USE: - You have a specific URL whose content you need. - You want to cap response size to stay inside your context window. - You want repeat fetches to be cheap (cache hits ≈ $0.0001). - The URL might be JS-rendered, a PDF, or behind a paywall — this tool auto-routes to the right fetcher (Trafilatura → Jina → FireCrawl → PDF). WHEN NOT TO USE: - You don't know which URL to fetch — use search_and_fetch instead. - You have many URLs to fetch — use fetch_multiple instead. Args: url: The URL to fetch. max_tokens: Hard cap on response size. Default unlimited. Pass this if you're tight on context budget — cheaper than over-fetching. format: "markdown" (default — recommended), "text", or "json". use_cache: True returns a cached copy if one exists (≤6h old). Pass False only when freshness matters (live news, prices). Returns: { "url": str, "success": bool, "markdown": str, "metadata": {title, author, published_date, domain, word_count, token_count, reading_time_seconds, content_type, language}, "cache": {hit, cached_at, expires_at}, "fetch_info": {fetcher_used, fetch_time_ms, cost_credits}, "error": str | None }
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | string | – | – |
| max_tokens | – | – | – |
| url | string | yes | – |
| use_cache | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_and_fetch ~182
Web search + fetch top results in one call. WHEN TO USE: - You have a research question, not specific URLs. E.g. "what's the latest on X", "find docs for Y library", "recent news about Z". - You'd otherwise have to call a search tool, parse results, then call fetch — this collapses that into one round-trip. Args: query: Search query (2–500 chars). num_results: Top N to fetch (1–10, default 3). max_tokens_each: Per-result cap (default 2000). Returns: {"query": str, "count": int, "results": [<fetch_url shape>, ...]}
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_tokens_each | integer | – | – |
| num_results | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.bch1212/agentfetch MCP server?
io.github.bch1212/agentfetch runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx agentfetch-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · agentfetch-mcp
claude mcp add bch1212-agentfetch -- uvx agentfetch-mcp
What is the io.github.bch1212/agentfetch MCP server?
io.github.bch1212/agentfetch is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.bch1212/agentfetch. Token-budgeted web fetch for AI agents, auto-routes Jina, FireCrawl, Trafilatura, PDF. This page covers its PyPI package (agentfetch-mcp).
What tools does the io.github.bch1212/agentfetch MCP server expose?
io.github.bch1212/agentfetch exposes 4 tools: fetch_url, estimate_tokens, fetch_multiple, search_and_fetch. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 912 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.bch1212/agentfetch MCP server still maintained?
io.github.bch1212/agentfetch is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.bch1212/agentfetch MCP server under?
io.github.bch1212/agentfetch declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.