io.github.Autostackup/hr
NPM · @AUTOSTACKUP/HR · SCANNED AUG 5
Candidate screening, offer letters, onboarding, interview kits & performance reviews for Claude.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Supply Chain Security87
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- Only part of the dependency tree could be resolved (96 of 100), so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- Only part of the dependency tree could be resolved (96 of 100), so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 57 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1130 tokens (~226/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
- Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage99
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 98% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
npm · @autostackup/hr
claude mcp add autostackup-hr -- npx -y @autostackup/hr
codex mcp add autostackup-hr -- npx -y @autostackup/hr
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"autostackup-hr": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@autostackup/hr"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add autostackup-hr --command npx --arg -y --arg @autostackup/hr
mcp_servers:
autostackup-hr:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@autostackup/hr"] {
"mcpServers": {
"autostackup-hr": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@autostackup/hr"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Aug 26 +2
- CVE-2026-69207 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- Known CVEs: fail → partial ▲ security
- 4 Aug 26 −1
- CVE-2026-69207 affects this package: medium ▼ security
- Known CVEs: partial → fail ▼ security
- 3 Aug 26 +4
- Stability: unverified → 0.27 ▲ functional
- 2 Aug 26 +45
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Install scripts: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Known CVEs: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window). security
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- License: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → excellent ▲ functional
- Dependency health: unverified → partial ▲ functional
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- 31 Jul 26 +12
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 −37
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- 27 Jul 26 43
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Aug 2026 · Analysed npm/@autostackup/[email protected]
Provenance none
Ecosystem: npm · Outcome: none
Dependencies 96 packages
96 packages in the resolved dependency tree · 95 deprecated · 29 stale · 1 without a linked repository.
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
build_interview_kit ~168
Generate a complete interview kit for any role — structured questions by competency, STAR follow-up probes, 'what good looks like' benchmarks, red flags, a scorecard template, legal reminders, and a debrief guide. Covers screening, technical, behavioural, case, panel, and final interviews.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| companyStage | string | — | Company stage — shapes the culture-fit questions |
| coreCompetencies | array | — | Key competencies to assess (e.g. leadership, technical depth, customer empathy) |
| department | string | yes | Department |
| interviewType | string | — | Type of interview |
| level | string | yes | Seniority level |
| mustAssess | array | — | Specific skills or situations that must be probed |
| role | string | yes | Job title being interviewed for |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
create_onboarding_plan ~226
Build a complete 30/60/90-day onboarding plan for a new hire. Includes Day 1 checklist, weekly themes, milestone goals, manager action list, red flag warnings, and a success definition. Adapts for IC, manager, and executive roles.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| companyValues | array | — | Company values to embed in the plan |
| department | string | yes | Department or team |
| employeeName | string | yes | New hire's full name |
| keyStakeholders | array | — | Key people they should meet (names or titles) |
| keyTools | array | — | Key software/tools they'll use (e.g. Salesforce, Notion, Figma) |
| manager | string | yes | Manager's name |
| remote | boolean | — | Is this a remote role? |
| role | string | yes | Job title |
| roleType | string | — | — |
| startDate | string | yes | Start date (e.g. July 1, 2025) |
| topPriorities | array | — | Top 3 things they should achieve in their first 90 days |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
draft_offer_letter ~282
Generate a professional, ready-to-send offer letter with compensation summary, equity and bonus clauses, expiry date, negotiation notes, and a follow-up call script. Supports formal, warm, and startup tones.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| benefits | array | — | Key benefits to highlight (e.g. health, dental, 401k, remote) |
| bonus | string | — | Bonus structure if any (e.g. 15% annual performance bonus) |
| candidateName | string | yes | Full name of the candidate |
| companyName | string | yes | Your company name |
| companySignatory | string | yes | Name and title of person signing the offer |
| currency | string | — | Currency code |
| department | string | yes | Department or team |
| equity | string | — | Equity offer if any (e.g. 0.5% vested over 4 years) |
| offerExpiryDays | number | — | Days until offer expires |
| probationPeriod | string | — | Probation period if applicable (e.g. 90 days) |
| reportingTo | string | yes | Manager's name and title |
| role | string | yes | Job title being offered |
| salary | number | yes | Annual base salary in USD |
| startDate | string | yes | Proposed start date (e.g. July 1, 2025) |
| tone | string | — | Tone of the offer letter |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
screen_candidate ~221
Score a candidate against a job's required skills, experience, and must-haves. Returns a tier (A/B/C/D), skill gap analysis, salary fit, and exact recommended next step. Built on structured competency scoring used by top People teams.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| background | string | yes | Brief background — education, companies, notable achievements |
| budgetCeiling | number | — | Maximum budget for the role in USD |
| candidateName | string | yes | Full name of the candidate |
| mustHaves | array | — | Non-negotiable requirements — instant disqualify if missing |
| niceToHaveSkills | array | — | Skills that are a bonus |
| redFlags | array | — | Any concerns noted (gaps, short tenures, etc.) |
| requiredSkills | array | yes | Skills required for the role |
| role | string | yes | Job title being hired for |
| salaryExpectation | number | — | Candidate's salary expectation in USD |
| skills | array | yes | Skills the candidate has |
| yearsExperience | number | yes | Years of relevant experience |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
write_performance_review ~233
Write a structured performance review with achievements narrative, development sections, next-period goals, compensation recommendation, and a manager meeting guide. Adapts to exceeds/meets/partially meets/does not meet ratings and supports coaching, direct, and formal tones.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| compensationAction | string | — | Recommended compensation or status action |
| developmentAreas | array | yes | Areas that need improvement |
| employeeName | string | yes | Employee's full name |
| goalsAchieved | array | yes | Goals or projects the employee completed this period |
| goalsNotMet | array | — | Goals that were missed or partially met |
| keyStrengths | array | yes | Top strengths demonstrated this period |
| manager | string | yes | Manager's name |
| nextPeriodGoals | array | — | Goals for the next review period |
| overallRating | string | yes | Overall performance rating |
| reviewPeriod | string | yes | Review period (e.g. H1 2025, Q3 2025, Annual 2024) |
| role | string | yes | Employee's job title |
| tone | string | — | Tone of the review |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.